Talk:Necromancer, 4th Variant (5e Class)
From D&D Wiki
Oppose. While I certainly do have my reservations about variants, this isn’t what this is about.
- Combined with the wizard spell list and not-Arcane recovery, this is just a buffed Wizard. It has more and better features(namely some at spell slot levels), and provides no meaningful downsides.
- There’s several spells that just link to external sites.
- Some of the wording is very off, sometimes using “per day” or “level X”.
I don’t know how many of these were introduced by IP edits(as it seems to be a popular place for them), but regardless I can’t support this becoming something that shows up on the front page. This may be an old request but I may as well voice my thoughts. --SwankyPants (talk) 17:57, 23 June 2021 (MDT)
Oppose. Simply based on the fact that this class is still under heavy amounts of editing, it is not complete to be a nominee. The concept itself, I think, will need to be differentiated and improved upon compared to the Necromancer (5e Class). While this class is under construction, I recommend the FA nominee be taken off and the WIP tag be applied instead.--Yanied (talk) 09:42, 2 September 2021 (MDT)