Talk:Weapon Alternatives (5e Other)

From D&D Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

I think the distinction of whether a blade is curved or not matters a great deal. A curved blade is designed to kill by slashing; a straight blade is designed to kill by thrusting. Technically, the odachi/nodachi doesn't fit into a pre-existing category here, because there are no two-handed slashing weapons in the core book. (Which is, I think, an absolute shame.) --Kydo (talk) 02:35, 17 July 2016 (MDT)

Um. The greatsword is a two-handed slashing weapon.
Most straight-edged swords were cut-and-thrust [1]. Many bastard swords had blunt tips and were only used for slashing, and as far as I can tell larger swords were only swung. Marasmusine (talk) 03:37, 17 July 2016 (MDT)
Huh! I've looked at that item like a million times now and always "seen" piercing! Interesting! Yes. Particularly large swords were only swung. The only instances I've ever read of a great sword being used to stab, refer only to very long ones which were being used in a role similar to a spear, and even those only appeared shortly before the rise of gunpowder, rendering them irrelevant. Bastard sword was just a late medieval or renaissance description for a long sword. It was still primarily a thrusting weapon, like any medieval European straight sword born from the siege warfare arms race. --Kydo (talk) 09:02, 17 July 2016 (MDT)

I have protected the page to autoconfirmed status for 1 week so I will not be engaged in an edit war. If you would like to discuss the bastard sword entry, please do so here, but don't just remove content because you disagree with it without saying anything. --Kydo (talk) 13:37, 14 December 2016 (MST)

Karambit?[edit]

in my opininion the gadder section could use a karambit, in my opinion it would just have to be a dagger with slashing instead of piercing

Small sword[edit]

A small sword is not a short sword derivative, it'd be better suited to being a rapier variant as that is the weapon it descended from.

A Few Notes[edit]

A backsword is much more suited as a rapier than a shortsword. A "basket-hilt sword" is not a more technical term for a shortsword as many blades without basket hilts could be called short swords. A broad sword (more specifically scottish broadswords) would encompass a mortuary sword and basket-hilt sword. If the katar is a "push dagger" why is it categorized under the shortsword category? I'm tempted to say a sidesword is more akin to a rapier, but it's honestly a transition between an arming sword and rapier. Sinclair is a hilt design and was sometimes mounted on curved blades, making the "sinclair" a tad redundant to put in the shortsword category. A "flanged mace" seems more akin to a morningstar than a warhammer.

PunnyDM12 (talk) 17:09, 19 November 2018 (MST)

Wakizashi[edit]

I think a wakizashi should be listed as a scimitar variant as opposed to a shortsword variant. From my understanding of the statistics, a scimitar and a shortsword are effectively identical aside from damage type (and likely weight): both have the light and finesse properties, and both deal 1d6 damage; the scimitar deals slashing and the shortsword piercing. Unless my knowledge is lacking, I believe a wakizashi is more often used for cutting rather than thrusting, so I would expect it to deal slashing damage, like a scimitar. - Alice-chan (talk) 14:58, 27 December 2018 (MST)

Home of user-generated,
homebrew pages!
system ref. documents


admin area
Terms and Conditions for Non-Human Visitors