Talk:Tarrasqin (5e Race)

From D&D Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Featured Article Nominee[edit]

Featured article candidate .png This article is a current featured article nominee as of 14:47, 25 January 2019 (MST). Featured articles exemplify D&D Wiki's very best work, and therefore must meet the featured article criteria. Please become engaged in this process and support, oppose, and leave comments as to this page's featured article nomination (engage!).

Oppose - I think this has been written well despite only having a single sentence for the description, and the traits aren't really crazy. But, its large. For something that is to be the best of the site's work, and our mission states upholding precedence, and the designers of the game we play say large races won't be used for multiple reasons, I cannot support an article to be featured with this trait. It goes against the core design for the game. (I know the Giant race passed, but I didn't contribute to that discussion and do wish it wasn't a FA). ~ BigShotFancyMan (talk) 10:17, 28 January 2019 (MST)

Ironically BSFM, the page lists a height that is actually still considered to be within the Medium size range but gives the Large size category afterwards. —ConcealedLightChatmod.png (talk) 10:31, 28 January 2019 (MST)
I didn't notice that..huh. ~ BigShotFancyMan (talk) 12:09, 28 January 2019 (MST)

Oppose - While I do enjoy the Earth Giant race and await the day when I can play one myself, I agree with BSFM's points. In addition, there are several things about the page that don't line up with my expectation for a FA so I'll have to oppose its nomination. —ConcealedLightChatmod.png (talk) 10:31, 28 January 2019 (MST)

I think large races would be fun for a one shot so I too look forward to letting loose sometime for that experience. ~ BigShotFancyMan (talk) 12:09, 28 January 2019 (MST)

Oppose - I gotta agree as well. It's a super cool article, definitely one of my favorites in fact. However, it doesn't really fit within the context of the featured article criteria nor the world of Dungeons and Dragons. Still a well-written page though! :) EpicBoss99 (talk) 11:01, 28 January 2019 (MST)

Oppose - The physical description is too short and lackluster. Furthermore, 'monstrous figure' does not clearly outline what penalties you incur from 'it being hard to wear armor'. "When you are not wearing armor" implies that it is possible to wear armor. ConcealedWife (talk) 10:38, 1 February 2019 (MST)

Home of user-generated,
homebrew pages!
system ref. documents

admin area
Terms and Conditions for Non-Human Visitors