Talk:Sorrow Blade (3.5e Prestige Class)

Rating - 10/10

10/10 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Archangel (talk • contribs) 17:41, 10 February 2008 Archangel (MST). Please sign your posts.

Unfortunately one cannot rate their own class. For that reason this rating has been nullified. Sorry about that. --Green Dragon 22:42, 10 February 2008 (MST)

Rating

Power - 5/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because it's so gothic --24.192.193.19 23:29, 24 May 2008 (MDT)

This rating has been removed since this classes rating is controversial. --Green Dragon 21:21, 25 May 2008 (MDT)

Wording - 5/5 I give this class a 4 out of 5 because I beleive that the wording could make it sound better if it were tweaked slightly --24.192.193.19 23:29, 24 May 2008 (MDT)

This rating has been removed since this classes rating is controversial. --Green Dragon 21:21, 25 May 2008 (MDT)

Formatting - 5/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because the goudelines are already perfect --24.192.193.19 23:29, 24 May 2008 (MDT)

This rating has been removed since this classes rating is controversial. --Green Dragon 21:21, 25 May 2008 (MDT)

Flavor - 4/5 I give this class a 4 out of 5 because it bears a slight resembalance to the blackguard prestige class. --24.192.193.19 23:29, 24 May 2008 (MDT)

This rating has been removed since this classes rating is controversial. --Green Dragon 21:21, 25 May 2008 (MDT)

Rating Problem

It's obvious that the person who gave this 19/20 either didn't read it, knows nothing about balance and spelling, or wrote it, and is trying to inflate their own ego. Is it possible to remove their rating? --Ganre 10:46, 25 May 2008 (MDT)

Removed. --Green Dragon 21:21, 25 May 2008 (MDT)

Rating

Power - 2/5 I give this class a 2 out of 5 because the DCs and effects of the abilities are too strong(EG: permanent loss of wisdom for a perform check). --Ganre 10:43, 25 May 2008 (MDT)

Wording - 3/5 I give this class a 3 out of 5 because I can decipher most of it, but you have a lot of grammer and spelling issues. --Ganre 10:43, 25 May 2008 (MDT)

Formatting - 2/5 I give this class a 2 out of 5 because the pregression on your BAB, and saves is non-standard. --Ganre 10:43, 25 May 2008 (MDT)

Flavor - 3/5 I give this class a 3 out of 5 because the idea is good, you didn't give a whole lot of flavor for it though. --Ganre 10:43, 25 May 2008 (MDT)

Rating

Power - 3/5 I give this class a 3 out of 5 because some of their abilities are way too powerful, while some of them are worthless at the level obtained, and some of them need limits to be clarified --Dxsam77 11:47, 14 May 2009 (MDT)

3 or 3.5? It makes a difference. -- Jota 14:12, 14 May 2009 (MDT)

3, it slipped--Dxsam77 11:47, 14 May 2009 (MDT)

Wording - 3/5 I give this class a 3 out of 5 because it doesn`t quite details the workings of some of its abilities, while some of them are just too up in the air for interpretation --Dxsam77 11:47, 14 May 2009 (MDT)

Formatting - 3/5 I give this class a 3 out of 5 because it should further improve while using appropiate templates and further detailing --Dxsam77 11:47, 14 May 2009 (MDT)

Flavor - 3/5 I give this class a 3 out of 5 because it`s consistent with its purpose while yet still seems missing some aspects about it. It looks sometimes more like a deppressed teenager than a villain --Dxsam77 11:47, 14 May 2009 (MDT)