Talk:Firearm Sniper (3.5e Feat)

From D&D Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Copyright Issues?[edit]

Green Dragon, what do you think? Fair use for foul call?--Dmilewski 06:20, 15 May 2007 (MDT)

I don't own the PHB II, so how similar is the wording of this to the wording of the feat in the PHB II? --Green Dragon 16:13, 15 May 2007 (MDT)
I own it, so I'll take a look. Even if it isn't like that, though, it would be assumed that it would be the same thing, as the muskets could be considered a exotic crossbow...but that's just me ^_^ -- Flession 18:45, 15 May 2007 (MDT)
The wording is almost verbatim. I just happened to be researching a crossbow character, so I read that feat this morning. --Dmilewski 20:21, 15 May 2007 (MDT)
Am I going to have to get rid of it? I will get rid of it if it is nessesary. If it is just the wording that needs to be changed, I will change it.--Pirate-Sorcerer
The wording definitely needs to be changed. It is not part of fair use to relabel something and then redistribute it. Keep the feat, but change all of the wording. — Blue Dragon (talk) 21:19, 15 May 2007 (MDT)
I have changed the wording of the feat, is it ok now?--Pirate-Sorcerer 22:01, 15 May 2007
Is it more than 60% different (thats the plagiarism line, right?)? --Green Dragon 22:31, 29 August 2007 (MDT)
Dunno. Why not add Template: Copyright Disclaimer just to be safe? I'll add it while I am here, but feel free to remove it if you think it is not needed or better off without it. --Sam Kay 05:03, 30 August 2007 (MDT)
I have now reworded the feat even more, hopefully it will be enough to avoid copyright issues. Pirate-Sorcerer 18:18, 30 August 2007 (MDT)
Okay... Can Template:Copyright Disclaimer be removed then? --Green Dragon 23:06, 30 August 2007 (MDT)
Spose so. You could leave it on there just in case, but it doesn't really matter too much. --Sam Kay 06:49, 31 August 2007 (MDT)
It's gone... --Green Dragon 21:34, 3 September 2007 (MDT)
Home of user-generated,
homebrew pages!