User talk:Sigendymion
From D&D Wiki
| Location | Notifier | Date/Time |
|---|---|---|
| Talk:D20_twilight_(DnD_&_D20M_Variant_Rule)#Metamagic Feat Type | Green Dragon (talk | contribs) | 21:53, 5 September 2007 (MDT) |
| Talk:D20_twilight_(DnD_&_D20M_Variant_Rule)#Feat Defects | Green Dragon (talk | contribs) | 21:53, 5 September 2007 (MDT) |
| Category_talk:Fey_Type#Book of Fey | Green Dragon (talk | contribs) | 13:13, 4 August 2007 (MDT) |
| Talk:Druid (Evaluational Base Class Layout) | Sledged (talk | contribs) | 10:26, 21 March 2007 (MDT) |
[edit] Welcome to D&D Wiki
Welcome to D&D Wiki. I hope you find what you want on this site, and I hope you decide to help it out. I am the owner of the site, and if you have a question feel free to ask me. Welcome. --Green Dragon 22:01, 13 September 2006 (MDT)
[edit] Edits on D20 twilight (DnD & D20M Variant Rule)
Hello. Recently an IP address made some edits on D20 twilight (DnD & D20M Variant Rule). These edits look legitimate, however I am wondering if these edits were yours. I used the "Check User" function of Admins and this IP did not correspond to your user. So, are these edits okay? The IP in question is 68.58.238.179. --Green Dragon 16:38, 2 January 2007 (MST)
- I noticed that too. They looked benign, even beneficial. I went and adjusted only a minor change and everything's ok to me. Probably a visitor from the wizards.com forums.... Thanks for letting me know. But after all, if I were worried about random, anonymous editors, I wouldn't post it on a Wiki, eh? :P --Sig 22:02, 2 January 2007 (MST)
- That is true, I just wanted to give you a heads up. I'm glad they were okay. --Green Dragon 22:04, 2 January 2007 (MST)
[edit] d20 Twilight Feat Tables
I'm noticing that the feats table contains metafeat information (list of feat types, list of defects). You mind if I break that information into it's own tables? —Sledged (talk) 14:44, 25 March 2007 (MDT)
- Ummmm I hope I understand what you mean and that I won't regret that I say: Yes, go ahead and do that. Are you sure that's not a lot of work? I'd also like the link to the original kept in place though just in case anyone wants the sheet.--Sig 23:20, 30 March 2007 (MDT)
