User talk:Name Violation
From D&D Wiki
|For reverting spam on many deleted pages and overall helping keep D&D Wiki clean from vandals' work throughout the last couple of days, I give you this Barnstar. Thanks for your help. --Green Dragon 23:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC)|
|For his uncanny spam radar and speedy reversion skills, I bestow onto Name Violation the hallowed honor of the Anti-Vandal Barnstar. JazzMan 17:07, 2 May 2010 (UTC)|
Cleaning the Sandbox
When inserting the last cleaned by information, please don't change the preload there. I believe it should read last cleaned on 20:50, 8 June 2010 (UTC) by Vrail (inserting the date and your name were asked, this is just an example). --Vrail 20:50, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
- yeah, i had no idea what i was doin, i was just removing yet another poop and genital jokeName Violation 22:00, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
I'd like to hear from you about reopening the tavern
So you may or may not know this, but Dandwiki used to have an IRC chatroom where contributors could talk in real time and get help from one another. While the chatroom was eventually removed, I'm polling the community to see if we would like to have one again. Here is where you come in. If you have some time (it shouldn't take more than a few minutes), stop by the discussion and post your thoughts. Thanks, Badger 21:50, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Help with sacred fist build
Hi can you help me I need some help with this build :
about the armor class, how can the monk wear a full armor plate and that does not lose the flurry of blows, because the ability of the Shiba Protector from Faiths of Eberron:
Holy Armor (Ex): Beginning at 2nd level, you retain the AC bonus granted by your monk levels (including Wisdom bonus to AC), even when wearing armor or carrying a shield or a medium or heavy load. This doesn’t extend to any other monk class features lost when wearing armor or carryinga load (such as fast movement and flurry of blows).
does not let you wear armor and retain the flurry of blows ability.
everyone is wondering this
is your name actually 'name violation', or was it changed by one of the administrators due to it being inappropriate?