Talk:Dweomercræft (3.5e Feat)

From D&D Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Unbalanced[edit]

There is an epic feat called Improved Metamagic which has a lesser effect with arguably greater prerequisites (higher level). --Aarnott 20:27, 17 March 2008 (MDT)

Hm... How should this be changed to make it more unique? Any thoughts? --Green Dragon 22:12, 17 March 2008 (MDT)
Thanks for pointing that out --I don't get much opportunity to play with epic levels, so I was unaware that a mechanic like this already existed. I made the requirements more stringent and modified the way the feat actually works. What say you now? --Rakankou 23:29, 17 March 2008 (MDT)

Clarifications?[edit]

I just have a few clarifications on the revised version that I would like to ask about.

"...reduced by one level, to a minimum of +1. Any metamagic feat which has a +1 spell slot modifier before this feat is taken is instead reduced to +0."

Does this apply to a feat that had a +2 modifier before Improved Metamagic was taken, or just feats that are +1 to start with? If it does apply to spells that were originally more than +1, I don't think that 'minimum of +1' should still be there. because the next sentence says you CAN reduce one to +0. You contradict yourself. (I'd edit it myself, but I don't know what your intent was.)

"...current metamagic feats...."

So if you later learn a new metamagic feat, does this feat still apply to it? I think the 'current' should also be dropped, but again I don't know your intent and I don't want to be misleading.

Thanks! --Dawn (who needs to create a bloody account) 13:51, 24 March 2008 (EST) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.181.78.252 (talkcontribs) 11:53, 24 March 2008 (MDT). Please sign your posts!

Those were my fault; when I revised the feat to conform more to the mechanics of Improved Metamagic, I hadn't put enough thought into how it sounded. It looked okay at the time, but I think it looks better now. Thanks for pointing those out. --Rakankou 21:07, 24 March 2008 (MDT)

Name Space[edit]

Is the funky symbol really required? It make the links/page title look really awkward. -DCF

Personal tools
d20M
miscellaneous
admin area
Terms and Conditions for Non-Human Visitors