https://www.dandwiki.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&user=Froggeh&feedformat=atomD&D Wiki - User contributions [en]2024-03-28T14:47:22ZUser contributionsMediaWiki 1.35.8https://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Morningstar&diff=452206SRD Talk:Morningstar2010-01-19T21:04:02Z<p>Froggeh: </p>
<hr />
<div>Could a cleric or a druid casts spikes on a morningstar?<br />
<br />
:Unlikely. Both spike spells are area spells, not target spells. --[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 20:20, 12 August 2009 (MDT)<br />
==Curiosity, cats, etc.==<br />
Is 5 hardness 6 hp correct for an adamantine morningstar? --[[User:Froggeh|Froggeh]] 06:15, 19 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
:adamantine has hardness 20 --[[User:Name Violation|Name Violation]] 08:13, 19 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
::Exactly what I was thinking, seems that table has an error --[[User:Froggeh|Froggeh]] 11:41, 19 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::The hardness is based on the wooden bits. Typically someone attempting to sunder a morningstar is going to try to break the haft, not the metal on top. This is why hafted weapons in [[SRD:Sunder#Table: Common Armor, Weapon, and Shield Hardness and Hit Points|Table: Common Armor, Weapon, and Shield Hardness and Hit Points]] have the hardness of wood (5) instead of metal (10). —[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 15:16, 19 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
::::I can't see anywhere that says the Morningstars have a wooden haft, so why is it assumed it is wooden hafted?--[[User:Froggeh|Froggeh]] 21:04, 19 January 2010 (UTC)</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Spiked_Gauntlet&diff=452165SRD Talk:Spiked Gauntlet2010-01-19T13:27:09Z<p>Froggeh: Created page with '==Sunder== Seeing as there is no number under hp on the table, would it be wrong to assume Spiked Gauntlets are un-sunderable?--~~~~'</p>
<hr />
<div>==Sunder==<br />
Seeing as there is no number under hp on the table, would it be wrong to assume Spiked Gauntlets are un-sunderable?--[[User:Froggeh|Froggeh]] 13:27, 19 January 2010 (UTC)</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Morningstar&diff=452164SRD Talk:Morningstar2010-01-19T13:24:24Z<p>Froggeh: </p>
<hr />
<div>Could a cleric or a druid casts spikes on a morningstar?<br />
<br />
:Unlikely. Both spike spells are area spells, not target spells. --[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 20:20, 12 August 2009 (MDT)<br />
==Curiosity, cats, etc.==<br />
Is 5 hardness 6 hp correct for an adamantine morningstar? --[[User:Froggeh|Froggeh]] 06:15, 19 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
:adamantine has hardness 20 --[[User:Name Violation|Name Violation]] 08:13, 19 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
::Exactly what I was thinking, seems that table has an error --[[User:Froggeh|Froggeh]] 11:41, 19 January 2010 (UTC)</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Morningstar&diff=452145SRD Talk:Morningstar2010-01-19T06:15:48Z<p>Froggeh: </p>
<hr />
<div>Could a cleric or a druid casts spikes on a morningstar?<br />
<br />
:Unlikely. Both spike spells are area spells, not target spells. --[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 20:20, 12 August 2009 (MDT)<br />
==Curiosity, cats, etc.==<br />
Is 5 hardness 6 hp correct for an adamantine morningstar? --[[User:Froggeh|Froggeh]] 06:15, 19 January 2010 (UTC)</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Primal_Water_Elemental&diff=451937SRD Talk:Primal Water Elemental2010-01-18T22:02:58Z<p>Froggeh: </p>
<hr />
<div>==Typos?==<br />
Improved Sunder, why does it have (SRD Feat) after it? "hap-pens" looks wrong too.--[[User:Froggeh|Froggeh]] 22:02, 18 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:Can only speculate. However, it seems the there was an additional error that was masking the rest of the feats. All fixed. —[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 18:41, 18 January 2010 (UTC)</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Three-Headed_Sirrush&diff=451898SRD Talk:Three-Headed Sirrush2010-01-18T13:55:19Z<p>Froggeh: Created page with '==Typos== Seems that there are a few typos on this page--~~~~'</p>
<hr />
<div>==Typos==<br />
Seems that there are a few typos on this page--[[User:Froggeh|Froggeh]] 13:55, 18 January 2010 (UTC)</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Primal_Water_Elemental&diff=451896SRD Talk:Primal Water Elemental2010-01-18T13:43:33Z<p>Froggeh: Created page with '==Typos?== Improved Sunder, why does it have (SRD Feat) after it? "hap-pens" looks wrong too.'</p>
<hr />
<div>==Typos?==<br />
Improved Sunder, why does it have (SRD Feat) after it? "hap-pens" looks wrong too.</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Devastation_Scorpion&diff=451895SRD Talk:Devastation Scorpion2010-01-18T13:26:56Z<p>Froggeh: Created page with '==Pion?== Seems that whenever pion is typed, like in Scorpion, it links to a page that shouldn't be linked too --~~~~'</p>
<hr />
<div>==Pion?==<br />
Seems that whenever pion is typed, like in Scorpion, it links to a page that shouldn't be linked too --[[User:Froggeh|Froggeh]] 13:26, 18 January 2010 (UTC)</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Storm_Giant&diff=451409SRD Talk:Storm Giant2010-01-15T13:46:50Z<p>Froggeh: Created page with '==Confusion from attacks== '' Greatsword +26 melee (4d6+21/19–20) or slam +26 melee (1d6+14) or composite longbow (+14 str=bonus) +14 ranged (3d6+14/x3) '' What does that mean…'</p>
<hr />
<div>==Confusion from attacks==<br />
'' Greatsword +26 melee (4d6+21/19–20) or slam +26 melee (1d6+14) or composite longbow (+14 str=bonus) +14 ranged (3d6+14/x3) ''<br />
<br />
What does that mean, (+14 str=bonus)?--[[User:Froggeh|Froggeh]] 13:46, 15 January 2010 (UTC)</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Chichimec&diff=451188SRD Talk:Chichimec2010-01-14T04:01:29Z<p>Froggeh: Created page with '==Charisma== Seems to me that the auto-linking to Charisma has damaged one of the links on this page.--~~~~'</p>
<hr />
<div>==Charisma==<br />
Seems to me that the auto-linking to Charisma has damaged one of the links on this page.--[[User:Froggeh|Froggeh]] 04:01, 14 January 2010 (UTC)</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Dart&diff=445912SRD Talk:Dart2010-01-05T12:24:13Z<p>Froggeh: Created page with '==Ammo== Shurikens state that the prices are for five, and that they should be treated like ammo. Darts do not, are they supposed to, or not?'</p>
<hr />
<div>==Ammo==<br />
Shurikens state that the prices are for five, and that they should be treated like ammo. Darts do not, are they supposed to, or not?</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Far_Shot&diff=440911SRD Talk:Far Shot2010-01-02T03:51:33Z<p>Froggeh: Created page with '==Horizon Shot== If I'm using Horizon Shot, can I use Far shot and Arcing Shot at the same time?--~~~~'</p>
<hr />
<div>==Horizon Shot==<br />
If I'm using Horizon Shot, can I use Far shot and Arcing Shot at the same time?--[[User:Froggeh|Froggeh]] 03:51, 2 January 2010 (UTC)</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Knock-Down&diff=437764SRD Talk:Knock-Down2009-12-27T02:40:38Z<p>Froggeh: </p>
<hr />
<div>== Errata ==<br />
<br />
An errata for this feat from Swords and Fist states that this feat does not work with [[Improved Trip]], although the reprint does not have this same errata, it should be noted that these two ''do not work together''. --[[User:TK-Squared|TK-Squared]] 22:43, 2 March 2009 (MST)<br />
<br />
: There's no 3.5 errata for this feat, so, officially, you can use them together, but there's no point to it. Improved Trip says that "you immediately get a melee attack against that opponent as if you hadn’t used your attack for the trip attempt." With Knock-Down, the attack used to trip the opponent was a free-action trip attack. If you hadn't used it, you'd still be limited to only making a trip attack. So essentially, you get to make another trip attack against an opponent that's already prone. If you choose to make another trip attack and fail the Strength check "the defender may immediately react and make a Strength check opposed by your Dexterity or Strength check to try to trip you." (See [[SRD:Trip#Making a Trip Attack|tripping]].) So not only is there no benefit, but you could end up being tripped yourself. —[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 09:49, 3 March 2009 (MST)<br />
<br />
== 3.0 Splatbook ==<br />
<br />
Why is this even called part of the SRD? I don't recall it ever appearing in a 3.5 book, much less the core rules, and even then it was in Sword and Fist, a splatbook. --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] 11:18, 24 July 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
: Because it's in the SRD. --[[User:TK-Squared|TK-Squared]] 11:23, 24 July 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:: I'm not seeing it in the [http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=d20/article/srd35 official SRD] under feats. Mind pointing it out to me there? --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] 11:25, 24 July 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:: If no one points it out, could this feat be removed from the SRD/moved to the homebrew section? --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] 12:40, 24 July 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:::It's in the SRD, under Divine Feats, according to http://www.d20srd.org/srd/divine/divineAbilitiesFeats.htm#knockDown [[User:Dragon Child|Dragon Child]] 16:12, 24 July 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
==Non-Lethal Damage==<br />
It says ten points of damage, could non-lethal damage count, ability damage? Or is it solely lethal damage?--[[User:Froggeh|Froggeh]] 19:40, 26 December 2009 (MST)</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Knock-Down&diff=437763SRD Talk:Knock-Down2009-12-27T02:40:19Z<p>Froggeh: </p>
<hr />
<div>== Errata ==<br />
<br />
An errata for this feat from Swords and Fist states that this feat does not work with [[Improved Trip]], although the reprint does not have this same errata, it should be noted that these two ''do not work together''. --[[User:TK-Squared|TK-Squared]] 22:43, 2 March 2009 (MST)<br />
<br />
: There's no 3.5 errata for this feat, so, officially, you can use them together, but there's no point to it. Improved Trip says that "you immediately get a melee attack against that opponent as if you hadn’t used your attack for the trip attempt." With Knock-Down, the attack used to trip the opponent was a free-action trip attack. If you hadn't used it, you'd still be limited to only making a trip attack. So essentially, you get to make another trip attack against an opponent that's already prone. If you choose to make another trip attack and fail the Strength check "the defender may immediately react and make a Strength check opposed by your Dexterity or Strength check to try to trip you." (See [[SRD:Trip#Making a Trip Attack|tripping]].) So not only is there no benefit, but you could end up being tripped yourself. —[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 09:49, 3 March 2009 (MST)<br />
<br />
== 3.0 Splatbook ==<br />
<br />
Why is this even called part of the SRD? I don't recall it ever appearing in a 3.5 book, much less the core rules, and even then it was in Sword and Fist, a splatbook. --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] 11:18, 24 July 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
: Because it's in the SRD. --[[User:TK-Squared|TK-Squared]] 11:23, 24 July 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:: I'm not seeing it in the [http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=d20/article/srd35 official SRD] under feats. Mind pointing it out to me there? --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] 11:25, 24 July 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:: If no one points it out, could this feat be removed from the SRD/moved to the homebrew section? --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] 12:40, 24 July 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:::It's in the SRD, under Divine Feats, according to http://www.d20srd.org/srd/divine/divineAbilitiesFeats.htm#knockDown [[User:Dragon Child|Dragon Child]] 16:12, 24 July 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
==Non-Lethal Damage==<br />
It says ten points of damage, could non-lethal damage count, ability damage? Or is it solely lethal damage?</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Flyby_Attack&diff=430144SRD Talk:Flyby Attack2009-12-21T14:00:10Z<p>Froggeh: New page: ==Clarification== It says they can use a standard action while using a move action. That takes their standard action for the turn, or could they use another?--~~~~</p>
<hr />
<div>==Clarification==<br />
It says they can use a standard action while using a move action. That takes their standard action for the turn, or could they use another?--[[User:Froggeh|Froggeh]] 07:00, 21 December 2009 (MST)</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Paladin&diff=430140SRD Talk:Paladin2009-12-21T13:49:11Z<p>Froggeh: /* Code of Conduct */</p>
<hr />
<div>== Wording ==<br />
<br />
Realizing it's SRD, no one has probably bothered to look more than just a cursory at it, but this lists the paladin as being proficient with 'martial weapons weapons'. {{Unsigned|63.151.152.45|14:12, 8 February 2007 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
:Look better now? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 13:17, 8 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Detect evil ==<br />
<br />
''Detect evil'' isn't listed in the class table. &ndash;[[User:Cuthalion|Cúthalion]] <small>([[User talk:Cuthalion|talk]])</small> 09:24, 5 July 2007 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:That was a flaw in the SRD. Good spotting. --[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 10:46, 5 July 2007 (MDT)<br />
<br />
== Role-Playing Alignment Restrictions ==<br />
<br />
Will there be a discussion page to discuss different ways to play a characters personality when it comes to rather "alignment limited" classes such as the paladin or monk? --[[User:Tokara2132|Tokara2132]] 00:15, 11 September 2007 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:Only if someone starts one. Feel free to do so in [[DnD Discussion|discussions]]. —[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 13:34, 11 September 2007 (MDT)<br />
<br />
==Paladin Variants==<br />
There are several lists of paladin variants listed under http://crystalkeep.com/d20/rules/DnD3.5Index-Classes-Base.pdf <br />
Of particular interest is the non-spellcasting paladin. Since this modification is rather minor, I believe that the Paladin SRD page should be edited to display it. <br />
<br />
And If anyone would like to post the other variants (some are already up here) that would be appreciated. (But I wouldn't mind doing it) {{Unsigned|168.213.1.133|07:15, 21 December 2007 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
:The SRD page has to remain identical to the way it is published in the SRD, but if you would like to start a new page to reflect the information you are talking about please feel free.--[[User:Calidore Chase|Calidore Chase]] 07:17, 21 December 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::Variants to SRD classes are actually treated as homebrew material, so please feel free to add the classes you are talking about to [[DnD Classes]]. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 11:19, 22 December 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Turn Undead ==<br />
<br />
In the epic thing it says that the paladin turns undead as a cleric two levels lower, but it says 3 levels lower in the non-epic section. Which one is right (I assume that it is the one in the non epic section). The same mistake is in the core rulebook. --[[User:Sam Kay|Sam Kay]] 09:13, 22 December 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:The non-epic section is the correct one. Under 3.0, paladin's gained TU at 3rd level, 2 levels after clerics. Now they don't get it until 4th level. There's number of omissions to the epic section regarding 3.5 updates. —[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 10:25, 22 December 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Where's the starting gold? ==<br />
<br />
I'm looking for the starting gold on tihs class, and I can't find it. Where is it? --[[User:Gedren56|Gedren56]] 13:04, 10 October 2008 (MDT)<br />
<br />
: We're not allowed to post that information. Wizards has claimed starting gold for the PHB classes as Product Identity even though the starting gold for the classes from the [[Expanded Psionics Handbook]] is [[Help:FAQ#What are OGL, OGC, SRD, and GNU FPL?|OGC]]. —[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 15:16, 10 October 2008 (MDT)<br />
<br />
== Code of Conduct ==<br />
Is that all the book says about the code of conduct? is there an expanded description in any book?--[[User:Froggeh|Froggeh]] 06:49, 21 December 2009 (MST)</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Paladin&diff=430139SRD Talk:Paladin2009-12-21T13:48:46Z<p>Froggeh: </p>
<hr />
<div>== Wording ==<br />
<br />
Realizing it's SRD, no one has probably bothered to look more than just a cursory at it, but this lists the paladin as being proficient with 'martial weapons weapons'. {{Unsigned|63.151.152.45|14:12, 8 February 2007 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
:Look better now? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 13:17, 8 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Detect evil ==<br />
<br />
''Detect evil'' isn't listed in the class table. &ndash;[[User:Cuthalion|Cúthalion]] <small>([[User talk:Cuthalion|talk]])</small> 09:24, 5 July 2007 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:That was a flaw in the SRD. Good spotting. --[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 10:46, 5 July 2007 (MDT)<br />
<br />
== Role-Playing Alignment Restrictions ==<br />
<br />
Will there be a discussion page to discuss different ways to play a characters personality when it comes to rather "alignment limited" classes such as the paladin or monk? --[[User:Tokara2132|Tokara2132]] 00:15, 11 September 2007 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:Only if someone starts one. Feel free to do so in [[DnD Discussion|discussions]]. —[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 13:34, 11 September 2007 (MDT)<br />
<br />
==Paladin Variants==<br />
There are several lists of paladin variants listed under http://crystalkeep.com/d20/rules/DnD3.5Index-Classes-Base.pdf <br />
Of particular interest is the non-spellcasting paladin. Since this modification is rather minor, I believe that the Paladin SRD page should be edited to display it. <br />
<br />
And If anyone would like to post the other variants (some are already up here) that would be appreciated. (But I wouldn't mind doing it) {{Unsigned|168.213.1.133|07:15, 21 December 2007 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
:The SRD page has to remain identical to the way it is published in the SRD, but if you would like to start a new page to reflect the information you are talking about please feel free.--[[User:Calidore Chase|Calidore Chase]] 07:17, 21 December 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::Variants to SRD classes are actually treated as homebrew material, so please feel free to add the classes you are talking about to [[DnD Classes]]. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 11:19, 22 December 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Turn Undead ==<br />
<br />
In the epic thing it says that the paladin turns undead as a cleric two levels lower, but it says 3 levels lower in the non-epic section. Which one is right (I assume that it is the one in the non epic section). The same mistake is in the core rulebook. --[[User:Sam Kay|Sam Kay]] 09:13, 22 December 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:The non-epic section is the correct one. Under 3.0, paladin's gained TU at 3rd level, 2 levels after clerics. Now they don't get it until 4th level. There's number of omissions to the epic section regarding 3.5 updates. —[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 10:25, 22 December 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Where's the starting gold? ==<br />
<br />
I'm looking for the starting gold on tihs class, and I can't find it. Where is it? --[[User:Gedren56|Gedren56]] 13:04, 10 October 2008 (MDT)<br />
<br />
: We're not allowed to post that information. Wizards has claimed starting gold for the PHB classes as Product Identity even though the starting gold for the classes from the [[Expanded Psionics Handbook]] is [[Help:FAQ#What are OGL, OGC, SRD, and GNU FPL?|OGC]]. —[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 15:16, 10 October 2008 (MDT)<br />
<br />
== Code of Conduct ==<br />
Is that all the book says about the code of conduct? is there an expanded description in any book?</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Hide_Armor&diff=429971SRD Talk:Hide Armor2009-12-19T21:53:06Z<p>Froggeh: /* Mundane Crystal Hide? */</p>
<hr />
<div>==Mundane Crystal Hide?==<br />
Can someone explain to me how Hide armor can be made out of crystal?--[[User:Froggeh|Froggeh]] 14:53, 19 December 2009 (MST)<br />
<br />
=References=<br />
<br />
Hide armor is leather armor made from unusually heavy leather.--[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 09:56, 15 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
==Page link errors==<br />
All the "Hide"s link to the hide skill. --[[User:Sabre070|Sabre070]] 20:52, 3 October 2008 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:Resolved. No need for the page to link back to itself anyways. --[[User:Calidore Chase|Calidore Chase]] 10:23, 4 October 2008 (MDT)</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Composite_Shortbow&diff=429970SRD Talk:Composite Shortbow2009-12-19T21:52:53Z<p>Froggeh: /* Mundane Crystal */</p>
<hr />
<div>== Mundane Crystal ==<br />
<br />
Can a Composite Shortbow really be made out of Mundane Crystal? --[[User:Froggeh|Froggeh]] 14:52, 19 December 2009 (MST)</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Hide_Armor&diff=429969SRD Talk:Hide Armor2009-12-19T21:52:34Z<p>Froggeh: </p>
<hr />
<div>==Mundane Crystal Hide?==<br />
Can someone explain to me how Hide armor can be made out of crystal?<br />
<br />
=References=<br />
<br />
Hide armor is leather armor made from unusually heavy leather.--[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 09:56, 15 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
==Page link errors==<br />
All the "Hide"s link to the hide skill. --[[User:Sabre070|Sabre070]] 20:52, 3 October 2008 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:Resolved. No need for the page to link back to itself anyways. --[[User:Calidore Chase|Calidore Chase]] 10:23, 4 October 2008 (MDT)</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Composite_Shortbow&diff=429962SRD Talk:Composite Shortbow2009-12-19T20:12:38Z<p>Froggeh: New page: ==Mundane Crystal== Can a Composite Shortbow really be made out of Mundane Crystal?</p>
<hr />
<div>==Mundane Crystal==<br />
Can a Composite Shortbow really be made out of Mundane Crystal?</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sledged_(3.5e_NPC)&diff=429631Talk:Sledged (3.5e NPC)2009-12-17T13:37:44Z<p>Froggeh: New page: This is cute.--~~~~</p>
<hr />
<div>This is cute.--[[User:Froggeh|Froggeh]] 06:37, 17 December 2009 (MST)</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Pyrokineticist&diff=428239SRD Talk:Pyrokineticist2009-12-08T14:06:11Z<p>Froggeh: </p>
<hr />
<div>I think the Saves should be Con based, pyrokineticist is just a kineticist that uses all fire, so having saves based off the kineticist cha score doesn't make sence<br />
:I disagree, I think CHA scores are more relevant, as the fire is psionic and therefore an extension of the characters mind and personality. Q.E.D. --[[User:Lolki|Lolki]] 19:59, 28 July 2008 (MDT)<br />
<br />
----<br />
It says that the bolt of fire, usable at will, does 1d6 for "every class level the pyro has." one of my PC is arguing that this means all of the class levels that he has including wilder etc. not just pyrokineticist levels. He wants to be able to use an at will spell thats just as powerful as a fireball without a damage cap. i disagree. any input? --&nbsp;<small><span style="border: 1px solid blue; -moz-border-radius:10px">[[User:Tug|'''<span style="background-color:White; color:Blue; -moz-border-radius-topleft:10px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft:10px"> Tug </span>''']][[User talk:Tug|<span style="background-color:black; color:white; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft:10px; -moz-border-radius-topleft:10px">&nbsp;&nbsp;talk&nbsp;&nbsp;</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Tug|<span style="background-color:black; color:white">&nbsp;&nbsp;contribs&nbsp;&nbsp;</span>]][[Special:Emailuser/Tug|<span style="background-color:black; color:white; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:10px; -moz-border-radius-topright:10px">&nbsp;&nbsp;email&nbsp;&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 20:00, 19 July 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:Whenever it says "class", that specifically means levels of THAT class only, and "character level" is used instead for levels of all classes. However, letting it be 1d6/character level would not be overpowered at all - the psychokinetic is underpowered as classes go, and bolt of fire deals so little damage at to be practically worthless. Even making it 1d6/character level still doesn't pump its damage up to a useful range [[User:Dragon Child|Dragon Child]] 20:05, 19 July 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
== Homebrew? ==<br />
<br />
This ''is'' homebrew, right? If so, why is it in the SRD namespace? Or are people just suggesting what they think would be appropriate changes for balancing something actually part of the SRD? --[[User:Taritus|Taritus]] 20:48, 19 July 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:This is part of the SRD, from the expanded psionic handbook. [[User:Dragon Child|Dragon Child]] 20:55, 19 July 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
== Linking ==<br />
A link to Weapon Focus and Weapon Specialization wouldn't be out of place, would they be? ([[User:Froggeh|Froggeh]] 07:06, 8 December 2009 (MST))</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Feather_Token&diff=428208SRD Talk:Feather Token2009-12-08T05:08:07Z<p>Froggeh: New page: ==Dancing== Would a link to the Dancing effect be out of place here? (~~~~)</p>
<hr />
<div>==Dancing==<br />
Would a link to the Dancing effect be out of place here? ([[User:Froggeh|Froggeh]] 22:08, 7 December 2009 (MST))</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Figurine_of_Wondrous_Power&diff=428013SRD Talk:Figurine of Wondrous Power2009-12-07T14:03:30Z<p>Froggeh: /* Linking */</p>
<hr />
<div>== Linking ==<br />
Seems like there are a few linking errors, such as Powers and Great Owl, at a glance. Also: A link to Pony or Hippogriff wouldn't be out of place, I'd imagine.</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Figurine_of_Wondrous_Power&diff=428012SRD Talk:Figurine of Wondrous Power2009-12-07T14:02:48Z<p>Froggeh: New page: == Linking == Seems like there are a few linking errors, such as Powers and Great Owl, at a glance.</p>
<hr />
<div>== Linking ==<br />
Seems like there are a few linking errors, such as Powers and Great Owl, at a glance.</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Giant_Owl&diff=428011SRD Talk:Giant Owl2009-12-07T14:01:14Z<p>Froggeh: New page: == Giant! == It seems like all of the times it links to the Giant(type) page, it really shouldn't link to it, because it isn't talking about the giant type.</p>
<hr />
<div>== Giant! ==<br />
It seems like all of the times it links to the Giant(type) page, it really shouldn't link to it, because it isn't talking about the giant type.</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sharpshooter,_Variant_(3.5e_Prestige_Class)&diff=428010Talk:Sharpshooter, Variant (3.5e Prestige Class)2009-12-07T13:45:44Z<p>Froggeh: </p>
<hr />
<div><font color="gray"><br />
== Rating - 7.5/10 ==<br />
<br />
I give this Prestige Class a 7.5/10 because It is both well balanced and an idea that I believe needed to happen. [[User:Zombiecow|Zombiecow]] 19:56, 16 February 2008 (MST)<br />
</font color><br />
<br />
:This rating has been nullified with the implementation of the new [[Rating System]]. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 10:41, 24 March 2008 (MDT)<br />
<br />
==Skirmish?==<br />
I could have sworn they got 2d6 skirmish damage and +1 to AC with a 10ft move at level 5-6, am I correct? And sorry for not signing my post I'm not sure how to. - Mjtime<br />
<br />
Yeah my friend has the book with the scout class in it and this is kinda close i guess... skirmish in the book i saw did extra Xd6 damage if you move 10 feet or more before your attack. and you did get +AC too, higher at higher lvl. i dunno how to sign posts either =P. - sumrandomguy<br />
<br />
== Sniper Shot/Snipe Attack ==<br />
<br />
This ability is pretty amusing in that it seems to trigger when you are the target of an opportunity attack. Finally, the melee archer is no longer just a pipe dream. That's actually sort of awesome. {{Unsigned|Finfreeze|01:27, 8 March 2008 (MDT)}}<br />
<br />
:Snipe Attack:When you fire from a ranged weapon and have an attack of opportunity you do extra damage.EG you are lv 3 you get 2d6 extra damage. Does this mean you threaten an area with a bow? If that's the case, it's over powered, if it's not, it needs to be clarified. --[[User:Ganre|Ganre]] 08:16, 9 May 2008 (MDT)<br />
<br />
== Edited for Spelling/Grammar! ==<br />
<br />
PLease, no need to thank me, my OCD did it all for me. {{Unsigned|Fydorian|19:44, 27 March 2008 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
<br />
== Rating == <br />
<br />
<s>'''Power - 5/5''' I give this class a 5 out of 5 because tis dah best class in teh world --[[User:70.70.50.195|70.70.50.195]] 22:20, 23 September 2008 (MDT)</s><br />
<br />
: Rating negated... give absolutely no reasons. --[[User:Lord Dhazriel|Lord Dhazriel]] 17:11, 21 April 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
== Naming ==<br />
Isn't it a bit... complicated to have two base classes of the same name? Scout, from Complete Adventurer, and this. Side note: Headshot seems like the DC would be too easily passed at level 20+</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Use_Rope_Skill&diff=428007SRD Talk:Use Rope Skill2009-12-07T13:26:59Z<p>Froggeh: /* Linking */</p>
<hr />
<div>==Swinging on a Rope==<br />
<br />
:''Discussion moved to [[Discussion:How does swinging on a rope work exactly?]] <small>since it was asking a question about how use rope worked exactly. [[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 13:49, 18 November 2007 (MST)</small><br />
<br />
==Linking==<br />
<br />
Linking: Grappling in Grappling Hook links to the Grapple page.<br />
: Was fixed, thanks.</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Grappling_Hook&diff=428006SRD Talk:Grappling Hook2009-12-07T13:26:04Z<p>Froggeh: /* Linking */</p>
<hr />
<div>== Linking ==<br />
Grappling, in Grappling Hook links to the page for Grapple.<br />
<br />
:Fixed. --[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 19:58, 6 December 2009 (MST)<br />
<br />
:: Almost, it still links in the wikipedia article link.</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Improved_Initiative&diff=428005SRD Talk:Improved Initiative2009-12-07T13:23:25Z<p>Froggeh: New page: ==Stacking== Would I be wrong to assume that you could not take this feat twice? It doesn't specify that you can only take this feat once.</p>
<hr />
<div>==Stacking==<br />
Would I be wrong to assume that you could not take this feat twice? It doesn't specify that you can only take this feat once.</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Use_Rope_Skill&diff=427777SRD Talk:Use Rope Skill2009-12-06T23:45:55Z<p>Froggeh: </p>
<hr />
<div>==Swinging on a Rope==<br />
<br />
:''Discussion moved to [[Discussion:How does swinging on a rope work exactly?]] <small>since it was asking a question about how use rope worked exactly. [[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 13:49, 18 November 2007 (MST)</small><br />
<br />
==Linking==<br />
<br />
Linking: Grappling in Grappling Hook links to the Grapple page.</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Grappling_Hook&diff=427520SRD Talk:Grappling Hook2009-12-06T10:48:50Z<p>Froggeh: New page: == Linking == Grappling, in Grappling Hook links to the page for Grapple.</p>
<hr />
<div>== Linking ==<br />
Grappling, in Grappling Hook links to the page for Grapple.</div>Froggehhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Mithral&diff=427311SRD Talk:Mithral2009-12-05T04:13:39Z<p>Froggeh: </p>
<hr />
<div>== Tolkien's original spelling ==<br />
Actually, I'm not sure what happened between Tolkien and WOTC, but "mithril" is how Tolkien spelled it, which makes it not a misspelling. I propose scrapping the current text to say something like:<br />
<br />
"Mithril" is the spelling for the metal from J.R.R. Tolkien's <i>Lord of the Rings.</i> In roleplaying usage, its spelling was changed to "mithral." <with link to mithral page> [[User:Macduffman|Macduffman]] 11:36, 9 May 2008 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:As much as I love The Lord of the Rings (look at [[J.R.R. Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings (DnD Campaign Setting)|this]] for LotR), and think that it should be Mithril, we cannot change it as it is part of the System Refrence Doccument. As for the Tolkien-WOTC thing, WOTC origionally nicked lots of stuff from LOTR (hobbits, balrogs, mithril, ents), but got sued by Tolkien Enterprises for not asking and for (I think) "taking credit" for it. There is, however, a page for mithril in the LotR camaign setting (link provided earlier). --[[User:Sam Kay|Sam Kay]] 12:56, 9 May 2008 (MDT)<br />
::My bad, Sam -- I swear I added this to the "mithril" page and not to the "mithral" page, yet here it is anyway. Thanks for the explanation regardless. See [[Mithril]] if you want to know what I was talking about. [[User:Macduffman|Macduffman]] 09:32, 12 May 2008 (MDT)<br />
<br />
== Oops ==<br />
Not sure how to move the above text, but it was supposed to end up on the "mithril" page and did not.[[User:Macduffman|Macduffman]] 11:38, 9 May 2008 (MDT)<br />
<br />
== Not quite right ==<br />
I'm unsure whether this is what previous people were bringing up, but the external link to wikipedia should probably point to "Mithril" considering the article is about the metal and in this case we're not talking about the software company, "Mithral" --[[User:SgtLion|SgtLion]] 02:29, 11 October 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
== Question ==<br />
If a piece of armor with a speed penalty is made mithril, is it the same speed, or is the speed changed?</div>Froggeh