https://www.dandwiki.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&user=80.175.250.218&feedformat=atomD&D Wiki - User contributions [en]2024-03-29T07:58:56ZUser contributionsMediaWiki 1.35.8https://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:System_Reference_Document&diff=105134SRD Talk:System Reference Document2007-05-31T17:03:51Z<p>80.175.250.218: /* Redirects for common pages */</p>
<hr />
<div>==SRD ToDo List==<br />
<br />
These are SRD tasks for the Wiki administrators and requested improvements/corrections to the SRD.<br />
<br />
* Review SRD Races category. Some pages have multiple races on environments. Some races have creature entries and race entries, while others only have creature entries. It's a bit of a knot.<br />
* Check Footers for all SRD pages. (Never updated links after the landing page changed.)<br />
*: I recommend changing all the "back to" [[System Reference Document]] links to just [[SRD]]. —[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 14:21, 25 May 2007 (MDT)<br />
* Figure out how to make DPL category mode list by TITLE, not by NAMESPACE,TITLE. Update SRD Infrastructure pages. ---- Mediawiki problem - Blue Dragon will hack it and fix it.<br />
* Review creature type descriptions for links.<br />
* Change all Teleportation to Teleportation Effect or Teleporation Subschool<br />
* Go through all spells changing <Tag> to <Tag School> or <Tag Subschool><br />
* Split up epic magic items into their own pages.<br />
<br />
===Completed Tasks===<br />
* Change all environment categories to "Category Environment" (Dmilewski working on this.)<br />
* Change all Type and Subtype categories to "Category Type" and "Category Subtype"--[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 12:11, 18 February 2007 (MST)<br />
* Change alignment categories to "Example Alignment" --[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 12:11, 18 February 2007 (MST)<br />
* Compiled table of all synergy skill bonuses (requested [[Talk:Skill Descriptions (SRD Rules)#Synergy table|here]]). ([[SRD:Table_of_Skill_Synergies|done]], but probably needs to be moved --[[User:Cuthalion|Cúthalion]] 13:30, 13 February 2007 (MST); moved. mdash;[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 15:06, 13 February 2007 (MST))<br />
* Create redirects for common vocabulary. For Example <nowiki>[[Dex]] -> [[Dexterity (SRD Term)]]</nowiki> Being handled by [[User:Cuthalion|Cúthalion]]<br />
* Review Alignment categories. Verify that things point to the right place.--[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 12:11, 18 February 2007 (MST)<br />
* Rename dragons to bring them in line with standards. Rename dragons from "Color Dragon" to "Dragon, Color".--[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 13:24, 18 February 2007 (MST)<br />
* Change all affect categories to say "Category Effect" (such as Cold spell, Evil spells, etc.)--[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 16:50, 19 February 2007 (MST)<br />
* Recategorize cleric domain spells and their spells.--[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 18:31, 19 February 2007 (MST)<br />
* I'd like to combine the game rule information in the [[SRD:Races|races]] page and the [[SRD:Creatures as Races|creatures as races]] page into one single page. &mdash;[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 18:07, 18 February 2007 (MST)<br />
* Add ''inflict'' category of spells. Done. --[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 20:30, 28 March 2007 (MDT)<br />
* Shifted all basic spells over to Spell template.<br />
* Shift Epic Spells to template.--[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 12:04, 2 April 2007 (MDT)<br />
* Shift Epic Spell Seeds to template.--[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 12:04, 2 April 2007 (MDT)<br />
* Replace Back To footer on all Spells, Spell Seeds, Epic Spells, and Powers.--[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 18:49, 4 April 2007 (MDT)<br />
* Shift Powers to Powers template.--[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 18:49, 4 April 2007 (MDT)<br />
* Review Creature Type and Subtype, and Planes for links.--[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 14:35, 12 April 2007 (MDT)<br />
* Removed the entries from the [[SRD:Special Abilities (Rules)|special abilities]] section that aren't special abilities; specifically [[SRD:Manufactured Weapons (Special Ability)|manufactured weapons]], [[SRD:Movement Modes (Special Ability)|movement modes]], [[SRD:Natural Weapons (Special Ability)|natural weapons]], [[SRD:Nonabilities (Special Ability)|nonabilities]], and [[SRD:Treasure (Special Ability)|treasure]]. &mdash;[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 17:09, 15 April 2007 (MDT):<br />
** [[SRD:Movement Modes (Special Ability)|Movement modes]] moved to the special movement rules section of [[SRD:Movement, Position, and Distance (Rules)#Special Movement Rules|movement, position, and distance]].<br />
** [[SRD:Nonabilities (Special Ability)|Nonabilities]] moved to [[SRD:Ability Scores (Rules)|ability score rules]].<br />
** [[SRD:Treasure (Special Ability)|Treasure]] moved to the treasure section in [[SRD:Reading Creature Entries#Treasure|reading creature entries]].<br />
** [[SRD:Natural Weapons (Special Ability)|Natural weapons]] moved to the [[SRD:Special Attacks (Rules)|special attacks]] section of the combat rules.<br />
** [[SRD:Manufactured Weapons (Special Ability)|Manufactured weapons]] split up and moved to the full attack section of [[SRD:Reading Creature Entries#Treasure|reading creature entries]] (trimmed out overly redundant text) and the [[SRD:Special Attacks (Rules)|special attacks]] section of the combat rules, and re-title "Manufactured and Natural Weapon Fighting."<br />
* Type magic items by their body slots.--[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 13:08, 23 May 2007 (MDT)<br />
* Increase linking inside of spells, especially stat areas. Reformatted all the spells using the Spell template.--[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 13:15, 23 May 2007 (MDT)<br />
* Split out Epic Artifacts. Merged Epic and Non-Epic artifacts together.--[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 10:59, 25 May 2007 (MDT)<br />
<br />
== SRD Requests ==<br />
<br />
These are requested things to do.<br />
<br />
* Anchor subsections of the SRD (see <span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Druid (SRD Class)|action=edit}} druid]</span> for example; requested [[Talk:Druid (SRD Class)# Anchors|here]]).<br />
<br />
::This project is so big that I'm putting it aside for now. Every single SRD page needs to be checked. --[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 07:23, 12 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::: Agreed. That's the main reason I prefer to use wiki headers, since it creates the anchors for you. However, I don't think this is worth a major retrofit effort, as you can always link to the broader section. Thanks, anyway. (I'm the one who made the request.) --[[User:Cuthalion|Cúthalion]] 08:18, 12 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::Okay. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 00:12, 13 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::I've started on this with the rules, and I'm working my way through the lists (feats, skills, spells, equipment, etc.). I've done the skills, feats, conditions, and (sub)types. I was getting ready to start on the classes, but I wasn't sure whether to keep them in their existing format, or go with something closer to the new format WotC is using in their more recent source books. I'm of the mind that the SRD classes should use the same format as the user classes, and given [[Talk:Liberator (DnD Class)#Wikify?|this discussion]], I think now is the time to iron out format. I've given a sample layout [[Druid (Evaluational Base Class Layout)|here]] using the [[druid]] as a guinea pig with notes on the [[Talk:Druid (Evaluational Base Class Layout)|talk page]].<br />
<br />
* <span style="color: gray;">Remove the entries from the [[SRD:Special Abilities (Rules)|special abilities]] section that aren't special abilities; specifically [[SRD:Manufactured Weapons (Special Ability)|manufactured weapons]], [[SRD:Movement Modes (Special Ability)|movement modes]], [[SRD:Natural Weapons (Special Ability)|natural weapons]], [[SRD:Nonabilities (Special Ability)|nonabilities]], and [[SRD:Treasure (Special Ability)|treasure]]. &mdash;[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 21:55, 26 February 2007 (MST)</span><br />
<br />
::<span style="color: gray;">Where would we put them?--[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 04:58, 8 March 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::<span style="color: gray;">I suggest putting [[SRD:Movement Modes (Special Ability)|movement modes]], in the special movement rules section of [[SRD:Movement, Position, and Distance (Rules)#Special Movement Rules|movement, position, and distance]].</span><br />
<br />
:::<span style="color: gray;">The intro text before the "Strength" header of [[SRD:Nonabilities (Special Ability)|nonabilities]] can go under the "The Abilities" header in the [[SRD:Ability Scores (Rules)|ability score rules]]. The rest of [[SRD:Nonabilities (Special Ability)|nonabilities]] can go under their relevant ability description.</span><br />
<br />
:::<span style="color: gray;">[[SRD:Treasure (Special Ability)|Treasure]] could go either in the [[SRD:Treasure (Rules)|treasure rules]] or the treasure section in [[SRD:Reading Creature Entries#Treasure|reading creature entries]].</span><br />
<br />
:::<span style="color: gray;">I'd give [[SRD:Natural Weapons (Special Ability)|natural weapons]] it's own subsection in the [[SRD:Special Attacks (Rules)|special attacks]] section of the combat rules. However, I'd trim out any text that explicitly refers to creature entries and move that to the [[SRD:Reading Creature Entries|reading creature entries]] under either attack or full attack.</span><br />
<br />
:::<span style="color: gray;">I suggest moving the first paragraph of [[SRD:Manufactured Weapons (Special Ability)|manufactured weapons]] to the full attack section of [[SRD:Reading Creature Entries#Treasure|reading creature entries]] (trimming out any overly redundant text). The second paragraph can be given it's own subsection in the [[SRD:Special Attacks (Rules)|special attacks]] section of the combat rules, and be given the title "Manufactured and Natural Weapon Fighting." &mdash;[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 10:02, 8 March 2007 (MST)</span><br />
<br />
::::<span style="color: gray;">I took a while to look this over. (New babies make for short attention spans.) It all looks good and your reasoning is sound. Move stuff about!--[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 07:52, 24 March 2007 (MDT)</span><br />
<br />
* Reorganize the character class information: Demo [[Multiclass Characters (SRD Evaluation)|Page 1: Multiclass Characters]] and [[Character Classes (SRD Evaluation)|Page 2:Character Classes]]. —[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 09:31, 31 May 2007 (MDT)<br />
*: Sweet. I'm 99% sold. I'd like to see the WotC links on the class page. (I feel that they are appropriate to the character class page.) --[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 09:43, 31 May 2007 (MDT)<br />
*:: Done. —[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 09:45, 31 May 2007 (MDT)<br />
<br />
==Ability Modifiers==<br />
<br />
Removed Ability Modifiers from the list as it is contained in Ability Scores --[[User:Calidore Chase|Calidore Chase]] 04:01, 14 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
==New SRD Landing Page==<br />
<br />
I've move in the new landing page. I hope that folks like the landing page better and can find things easier. If you have usability issues or other comments, please leave comments here. <br />
<br />
Thanks to everyone who helped out on that sticky problem. Thank you especially [[User:Green Dragon]] for coming up with the winning design, and [[User:Sledged]] for coming with with many different designs, and for helping me shift things about. This page was a group effort in every sense of the word. --[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 07:45, 20 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
:Yes, it was a wonderful meeting of the minds, especially if you take into account that among the initial styles, there were four votes for four different styles. My hat's off to every contributer. &mdash;[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] 10:24, 20 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
::Agreed, this is much much better. Everyone, thanks for making this work. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 16:01, 20 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::It looks much better. Well done, all-- [[User:EldritchNumen|EldritchNumen]] 01:21, 24 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
==SRD Question==<br />
<br />
Sorry if this is a dumb question, but before too long I plan on Posting my Campaign setting to the Wiki. But it makes heavy use of the "Taint of Evil" rules from "Heroes of Horror". Am I allowed to create a reference document for these rules, and if so how close to verbatim can the article be? -- [[User:Sepsis|Sepsis]] 16:21, 10 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:This should be answered in ''Heroes of Horror''. Look for the license (in the front or the back) and find "Designation of Open Game Content" and "Designation of Product Identity" (or similar words). These will state what is and is not Open Game Content. Pay close attention to both statements. The wording can be dense and confusing, but if you take the time to wade through the detail, you will have an idea of what is available. If there is no designation of "Open Game Conent," then there is no open game content. --[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 19:23, 10 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::Thank you for the answer...I checked and it does specifically state, that none of the content of HoH is "Open Game Content". Oh well..such is life. -- [[User:Sepsis|Sepsis]] 19:37, 10 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::So, you cannot post it here however you can reference it. What were you planning on doing with the HoH content anyway? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 23:10, 11 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::My Campaign setting makes heavy use of the "Taint of Evil" rules, and fearing there would be those without access to the rules I was thinking of transcribing that section into the Wiki. But I'll just reference the appropriate sections instead. Those intrested in a Fantasy-Horror game most likely own the title already (I hope). -- [[User:Sepsis|Sepsis]] 09:30, 12 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::::I think most people that like horror do (I own very little books and that is one of the ones I do). I think referencing should work. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 23:37, 12 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
: I can't help but appreciate the irony of this question, in that it has nothing to do with the SRD. &mdash;[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 18:02, 18 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:: ''':)''' &mdash;[[User:EldritchNumen|EldritchNumen]] 15:18, 6 March 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Redirects for common pages ==<br />
<br />
I'm thinking about adding in a bunch of redirects for commonly linked SRD pages, so you could, for instance, type <nowiki>[[Dex]]</nowiki> and have it go to the right place. This would save a whole lot of effort in creating new pages, not to mention maintaining them, and would be 100% backward compatible. Any objections? --[[User:Cuthalion|Cúthalion]] 08:26, 12 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:That's a good idea. I've added this to the todo list. Hold off starting for a bit, as we'll be porting the SRD and MSRD into their own namespaces. (No need doing this project twice.) After that, go for it. Keep the ideas coming. Your fresh eyes are helping!!!--[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 10:58, 12 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::I've actually started doing that here and there, and I agree it's very helpful. There needs to be a bit of care in how it's done. I would recommend having <nowiki>[[Magic Missile]]</nowiki> redirect to the spell, but some terms could potentially redirect to more than one place (e.g. <nowiki>[[Shield]]</nowiki>), and how would one decide to which page they go. &mdash;[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 11:10, 12 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::I was about to gush about this, then I thought of the MSRD. As we go forward with this, we will be excluding the Modern side from doing the same thing. I still think that we should do it, but I wanted to acknowledge that downside.<br />
<br />
:::Here's what I see that's safe: (SRD Term), (SRD Rules) and (SRD Special Ability). --[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 11:27, 12 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::Most are safe, however I would not want to favor the SRD over Homebrew items. Odviously some will work however less direct links I would not do as I think Homebrew deserve as much credit as published material. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 23:40, 12 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::::My initial thought was to expect redirects only for commonly referenced SRD items, including attributes, skills, base classes, and certain feats (e.g. Dodge). Anything beyond that is an added luxury as far as I'm concerned. The more the merrier. --[[User:Cuthalion|Cúthalion]] 09:45, 14 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::::I've done a lot of these. Now I'm just planning to add more incrementally as needed. --[[User:Cuthalion|Cúthalion]] 13:49, 14 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::::So far they all look okay. Just make sure not to give the SRD to much credit over Homebrew. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 16:45, 15 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::Ooh, this is nice! (Ironically, it was the page for Magic Missile that I was searching for!) --[[User:80.175.250.218|80.175.250.218]] 11:03, 31 May 2007 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:: What's the ETA on the namespace changes? I've been saving (lots of) time by anticipating redirects, but I've been told my red links are an eyesore. --[[User:Cuthalion|Cúthalion]] 09:45, 14 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::Its happened. There must be an issue somewhere. --[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 10:55, 14 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::No issue, this just means I can start adding the redirects. Thanks. --[[User:Cuthalion|Cúthalion]] 11:58, 14 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Moved Epic Level Basics ==<br />
<br />
After looking over the [[SRD:Epic Level Basics (Rules)|epic level basics rules]], there didn't seem to be a good reason to leave it dangling by itself in its own section. All the rules there pertain to epic character progression and nothing else, so I moved it to sit with the rest of the character rules. &mdash;[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 10:06, 13 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:Looks good. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 22:46, 13 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Help me find... ==<br />
<br />
...That table in the DMG that tells me how much players are supposed to have at each level? Is it in here anywhere? [[User:Armond|Armond]] 12:41, 6 March 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:Unfortunately, that's not OGC, so you're not going to find it in the SRD; only in the DMG. &mdash;[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 12:47, 6 March 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::I understood most of the words in that sentence. Ok, if we were to put handy stuff like that on the wiki, where would we put it? And what's OGC? {{Unsigned|156.1.60.60|11:26, 7 March 2007 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
:::"Open Game Content" as defined in the [[Open Game License v1.0a]]. Putting anything on the wiki from the DMG that's not also part of the SRD is not allowed. (See WotC's [http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=d20 d20 section] of their site for more information.) &mdash;[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 12:00, 7 March 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::: Or, in other words, some "handy stuff" like that can't be added because it's a legal violation of the license. Sorry, it simply can't be on the wiki. &mdash;[[User:EldritchNumen|EldritchNumen]] 15:13, 7 March 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::::Ok. Well, that's not great. So how do I tell if something's OGC, SRD, or ILV (In legal violation) without wading through a thousand legal papers? Will it say in the front of the book or is there a general way to tell? [[User:Armond|Armond]] 12:51, 9 March 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::::To quote [[User talk:Green Dragon#Thanks for the PM|Green Dragon]] (since he has said well enough already):<br />
<br />
::::::''Check the inside front of the books (on the page with the copyright information). If it reads, "None of the content in this book is Open Game Content" then you can't add anything.''<br />
<br />
::::::&mdash;[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 13:03, 9 March 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::::::Judging by the fact that my Dragon Magic says that, I'm guessing that almost none of the accessories are OGC. And I'm betting Wizards won't give us permission to document anything here because then people would just come and read it here instead of buying the books. So, next question: How do I carry all my D&D books in my backpack to school so I can reference them when I do most of my posting? :P [[User:Armond|Armond]] 18:00, 9 March 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== To do: Special Abilities ==<br />
<br />
Clearly they aren't special abilities, but what would be a better tag? [[User:Armond|Armond]] 12:15, 12 April 2007 (MDT)<br />
<br />
== Movement modes ==<br />
<br />
So I've moved movement modes under [[SRD:Movement, Position, and Distance (Rules)]]. Right now it's under "Special Movement Rules" (A), but I'm debating whether it's best there, if it'd be best as it's own section under "Tactical Movement" (B), or for it to be it's own section under "Movement, Position, and Distance" (C).<br />
<br />
{| class="column"<br />
|- style="text-align: center;"<br />
! A<br />
! B<br />
! C<br />
|-<br />
|1 Movement, Position, and Distance<br />
: 1.1 Tactical Movement<br />
:: 1.1.5 Special Movement Rules<br />
::: 1.1.5.4 Movement Modes<br />
:::: 1.1.5.4.1 Burrow<br />
:::: 1.1.5.4.2 Climb<br />
:::: 1.1.5.4.3 Fly<br />
:::: 1.1.5.4.4 Swim<br />
|1 Movement, Position, and Distance<br />
: 1.1 Tactical Movement<br />
:: 1.1.5 Special Movement Rules<br />
:: 1.1.6 Movement Modes<br />
::: 1.1.6.1 Burrow<br />
::: 1.1.6.2 Climb<br />
::: 1.1.6.3 Fly<br />
::: 1.1.6.4 Swim<br />
|1 Movement, Position, and Distance<br />
: 1.1 Tactical Movement<br />
:: 1.1.5 Special Movement Rules<br />
: 1.2 Movement Modes<br />
:: 1.2.1 Burrow<br />
:: 1.2.2 Climb<br />
:: 1.2.3 Fly<br />
:: 1.2.4 Swim<br />
|}<br />
&mdash;[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 11:45, 16 April 2007 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:I vote for B. [[User:Armond|Armond]] 15:49, 16 April 2007 (MDT)<br />
<br />
::I agree. &ndash;[[User:EldritchNumen|EldritchNumen]] 19:23, 16 April 2007 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:::I am for B or C. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 22:40, 16 April 2007 (MDT)<br />
<br />
::::B it is. &mdash;[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 12:09, 20 April 2007 (MDT)</div>80.175.250.218https://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Symbol_of_Insanity&diff=98207SRD Talk:Symbol of Insanity2007-05-05T11:16:10Z<p>80.175.250.218: Missing Link</p>
<hr />
<div>== Missing Link ==<br />
<br />
Please link the ''insanity'' spell as appropriate. Thanks. --[[User:80.175.250.218|80.175.250.218]] 05:16, 5 May 2007 (MDT)</div>80.175.250.218https://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Full-Round_Actions&diff=97357SRD Talk:Full-Round Actions2007-05-01T08:55:45Z<p>80.175.250.218: /* :Category:Rule (SRD) */</p>
<hr />
<div>== [[:Category:Rule (SRD)]] ==<br />
<br />
Doesn't this page belong in the Rule (SRD) category? {{Unsigned|80.175.250.218|06:19, 10 April 2007 (MDT)}}<br />
<br />
:Fixed, thanks. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 18:18, 10 April 2007 (MDT)<br />
<br />
::This seems to have made the page appear twice on the category page, once on the main listing and then once under Articles in category. --[[User:80.175.250.218|80.175.250.218]] 02:55, 1 May 2007 (MDT)</div>80.175.250.218https://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Epic_Obstacles&diff=97356SRD Talk:Epic Obstacles2007-05-01T08:44:31Z<p>80.175.250.218: Portcullis, wodden</p>
<hr />
<div>== Obdurium ==<br />
<br />
'''[[Obdurium]]''' ('[http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=products/dndacc/881660000 Stronghold Builder’s Guidebook]]'') is not listed here (I understand it is not SRD).<br /><small>[[User:David Latapie|David Latapie]] ([[User_talk:David Latapie|✒]] | [[Special:Emailuser/David Latapie|@]]) — [http://blog.empyree.org/en blog]</small> 04:58, 11 April 2007 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:Is it [[OGL]]? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 20:44, 11 April 2007 (MDT)<br />
<br />
::No this is a WotC (''[http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=products/dndacc/881660000 Stronghold Builder’s Guidebook]]'') and no mention of it in the Web Enhancements or Excerpts (I DO remember seeing it somewhere else, but certainly not an OGL conternt). Do you think mentionning its hardness would infringe ''fair use'' (I assume the server is in the U.S., where ''fair use'' apply—correct me if I'm wrong).<br /><small>[[User:David Latapie|David Latapie]] ([[User_talk:David Latapie|✒]] | [[Special:Emailuser/David Latapie|@]]) — [http://blog.empyree.org/en blog]</small> 05:04, 12 April 2007 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:::It may &mdash; it is safer to just not put it on D&D Wiki. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 21:03, 12 April 2007 (MDT)<br />
<br />
== Portcullis, wodden ==<br />
<br />
Simple typo fix. --[[User:80.175.250.218|80.175.250.218]] 02:44, 1 May 2007 (MDT)</div>80.175.250.218https://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=User:80.175.250.218&diff=93676User:80.175.250.2182007-04-10T13:22:27Z<p>80.175.250.218: New page: contribs</p>
<hr />
<div>[[Special:Contributions/80.175.250.218|contribs]]</div>80.175.250.218https://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Full-Round_Actions&diff=93674SRD Talk:Full-Round Actions2007-04-10T13:19:25Z<p>80.175.250.218: Categorisation</p>
<hr />
<div>Doesn't this page belong in the Rule (SRD) category?</div>80.175.250.218https://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Category_talk:Rule_(SRD)&diff=93673Category talk:Rule (SRD)2007-04-10T12:49:05Z<p>80.175.250.218: Recursiveness</p>
<hr />
<div>Why is this category a subcategory of itself? --[[User:80.175.250.218|80.175.250.218]] 06:49, 10 April 2007 (MDT)</div>80.175.250.218https://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=SRD_Talk:Attacks_of_Opportunity&diff=93672SRD Talk:Attacks of Opportunity2007-04-10T12:45:48Z<p>80.175.250.218: Lack of links</p>
<hr />
<div>== Clarification of references ==<br />
<br />
At one point the article says "the 5-foot-step and the withdraw action (see below)", but it isn't clear that it is referring to the link to another page/table. I'd recommend including the same link twice "(see <link>Table</link>)". {{Unsigned|209.34.196.154|06:26, 30 March 2007 (MDT)}}<br />
<br />
:Done. Hope it is easier to navigate now. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 08:31, 30 March 2007 (MDT)<br />
<br />
== Lack of links ==<br />
<br />
I don't play DnD (although I've tried it in the past) so when I was browsing I was disappointed to find that neither this page nor the Action Types page actually links to what the actions are... to find out what a Withdraw was, for instance, I had to Google for it - and even then, the 9th hit for this site was a redirect to the correct page! For those who are interested, the actual link is here: [[SRD:Full-Round_Actions_(Rules)#Withdraw|Withdraw]] --[[User:80.175.250.218|80.175.250.218]] 06:45, 10 April 2007 (MDT)</div>80.175.250.218