Talk:Gypsy (3.5e Class)
From D&D Wiki
Save VS. Death?
Did we go back to second ed? :P --Name Violation 17:12, 3 November 2009 (MST)
- Death as in zero hp or -10 hp? --Jay Freedman 17:21, 3 November 2009 (MST)
- Did we - Nevermind, stupid question. Anyway, Death as in "The monsters dead." When used versus a player character, I would imagine it'd be left up to the DM. --Avlindrel FallenTree 20:10, 3 November 2009 (MST)
I give this class a 4.5 out of 5, because it looks like it would work out well in a campaign. Some little hints would be to add somesort of future sense. Like palm reading or tarot card readings. As a skill, or just as some freaky feat. Either way, I like it. - Logenasty
Erm, there's some data missing in the 9th-level spells column. If I get around to it, I'll see about fixing it. -- Danzig 20:55, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
As a Feat
-- I am a little hesitant to make this it's own class, but I do think a feat that would be nice would be something like such: Romani: +2 to Perform and Handle Animal. This would allow the skills to be used untrained.
This would represent a life style the Romani people and their flavor. Just something you might want to add or use as an alternative. -- Ledeas Oakenbough
Balance - 3/5 I give this class a 3 out of 5 because <<<While it does seem on the strong side of things, it's not insanely more stronger than what a beguiler into assasin could achieve. I see it as a rather strong class, but not gamebreaking, the spell list might need some more limitations though.>>> --126.96.36.199 09:43, 1 July 2013 (MDT)
Wording - 4/5 I give this class a 4 out of 5 because <<<The wordings were rather clear, but there were a few problems. E.g. it says about having a bonus that applies whlie being flat-footed, but not while being denied dex, this should be clarified.>>> --188.8.131.52 09:43, 1 July 2013 (MDT)
Flavor - 5/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because <<>> --184.108.40.206 09:43, 1 July 2013 (MDT)