Talk:Daunting Assailant (3.5e Class)

From D&D Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Image[edit]

This class is based on Rorschach from Watchmen, and as such the most appropriate image to use would be one of Rorschach. Is there any legal way to use one? I know Wikipedia sometimes uses some legal rationale to establish fair use, but I have no idea whether this page would constitute fair use or whether there are any free images available of him. Can anyone help me? --Daniel Draco 11:19, 27 March 2009 (MDT)

Rating[edit]

Power - 2/5 I give this class a 2 out of 5 because this class comes off as quite overpowered to me.

  • The Rogue gets their Special Abilities at 10th level. This starts at level 2.
  • Category:Improvised Weapon exists for weapons. Their is no need to make up rules for improvised weapons (that I can see).
  • Daunt comes off as quite overpowered, especially when the player starts getting more of these class features.
  • etc.

I mean this class just comes off as a Rogue/Monk which can intimidate opponents for a quite improved combat advantage. --Green Dragon 15:20, 7 April 2009 (MDT)

  • The fighter gets its feats at first level, but it still ends up being underpowered.
  • That category is...confusing. By the SRD rules, improvised weapons simply use the stats of the most similar actual weapon, with a -4 penalty on attacks. I based the improvised weapon ability on the similar abilities granted by the Drunken Master from Complete Warrior.
  • I don't see how daunt is overpowered. So the enemies are shaken for a few rounds. A spellcaster can do far worse at the same level.
Well, the monk is underpowered, so it really shouldn't be used as a standard for power. Its combat advantage comes to some penalties and extra damage, but the extra damage is less than that of the rogue. --Daniel Draco 22:15, 7 April 2009 (MDT)
Rating negated due to nonsensical basis and three months without justification. For example, "quite overpowered" is not, itself, an explanation of why it is overpowered. Sorry GD. --Daniel Draco 14:30, 3 July 2009 (MDT)

Wording - 4/5 I give this class a 4 out of 5 because the wording present is pretty good for the most part, except a few questions are raised. For example why does AC Bonus not use the same wording as the Monk's? Also, Dire Attack has some extraneous wording. --Green Dragon 15:20, 7 April 2009 (MDT)

The wording is different to be a bit more concise, and because it's slightly different in mechanics. What extraneous wording? --Daniel Draco 22:15, 7 April 2009 (MDT)
Rating negated due to nonsensical basis (different ≠ bad) and lack of explanation for what wording is extraneous. --Daniel Draco 14:30, 3 July 2009 (MDT)

Formatting - 3.5/5 I give this class a 3.5 out of 5 because no links to the SRD are present and the class feature table entries do not link to their class features. --Green Dragon 15:20, 7 April 2009 (MDT)

Yes, this and flavor will come after it's playtested and possibly tweaked. --Daniel Draco 22:15, 7 April 2009 (MDT)

Flavor - 0/5 I give this class a 0 out of 5 because no fluff information is present and no example NPC is present. --Green Dragon 15:20, 7 April 2009 (MDT)

unlock request[edit]

The originator obviously has no want to finish it so we should be able to either start finishing it or remove it depending on the information available. Tivanir 11:57, 2 April 2012 (MDT)

Personal tools
d20M
miscellaneous
admin area
Terms and Conditions for Non-Human Visitors