Talk:Chuck Norris (3.5e Deity)

[edit] Commentary

This is still hilarious. This never gets old. --Othtim 06:54, 1 October 2007 (MDT)

Yeah, but it says he is neutral, free spirited, and seems chaotic. Doesn't add up. Makes about as much sense as the square root of popeye. I'd make him chaotic neutral. --Sam Kay 11:18, 1 October 2007 (MDT)

Thanks for changing it! --Green Dragon 21:09, 1 October 2007 (MDT)

I which case his followers should be chaotic good, chaotic evil, chaotic neutral and true neutral. --Sam Kay 11:03, 5 October 2007 (MDT)

l...m...a...o!! --Penske 18:51, 5 February 2008 (MST)

[edit] Featured Article Nomination

— This article did not become a featured article. --Green Dragon 09:58, 24 March 2008 (MDT)
Please feel free to re-nominate it once it meets the FA criteria and when all the major issues brought up in this nomination have been dealt with.

I nominate this to be a featured article because, despite losing track of the number of times I've visited it, it never fails to make me laugh. I also think overdieties should be exceedingly rare (I think there are only two known ones in the official D&D worlds), so when one is conceived it should stand out in some exceptional manner. —Sledged (talk) 14:57, 7 March 2008 (MST)

Comment — I think a picture could be helpful ;). Also, so many "Roundhouse Kicks" jokes... I think the other ones are funnier. We can always get more jokes from uncyclopedia's Chuck Norris/Facts page. --Green Dragon 14:58, 7 March 2008 (MST)

I actually think it would be a lot more funny, and not so repetitive as to what other sites have, if we made all the things Chuck Norris can do D&D-related. For example "The only reason Kobolds are alive is because Chuck Norris likes them more than the average adventurer". "There is no DM, there is just Chuck Norris". --Green Dragon 15:39, 7 March 2008 (MST)

Comment — Added GDs jokes I liked them. Why is his alignment CN but the clergy have to be LN or TN? added picture what do you think? --Hawk 19:53, 7 March 2008 (MST)

Oppose — The FA page states "Featured articles are considered to be the best articles within D&D Wiki" To be honest I don't think this is one of the best articles here. I will admit it does follow the criteria pretty well but I still feel I have to oppose it. EDIT: perhaps if more of the jokes were DnD related as GD says i'd change my mind. --Hawk 18:58, 8 March 2008 (MST)

Oppose — I agree with Hawk. I would also like to point out that although it is being nominated for comedy merit, I do not find it funny. Maybe mildly amusing, but not funny. --Sam Kay 09:21, 9 March 2008 (MDT)

As the sort-of inventor, I would like to thank everyone who made this page a smashing success. On a different note, I originally had Chuck Norris as True Neutral because he did everything, whether it be good, evil, chaotic, or lawful. He didn't care about his clerics, so they could be any alignment, too. It'd be cool if Chuck had a made up alignment, like Neutral Kick-ass. But that is just a thought. P.S. Great Picture, Hawk. --The Holy Spartan 10:56, 26 March 2008

[edit] LOL

Just got back from a long tdy with alot of portapotties. Inside one of them was written, "When Chuck Norris pees he clogs the toilet." Found it rather amusing. --Calidore Chase 15:32, 26 August 2008 (MDT)