Talk:Bone Knight (3.5e Prestige Class)

From D&D Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

This class is very broken... you get a set of armor, shield, and a sword...all of which at such a low level will destroy encounters. Bane anything is very harsh...what I see or what you should do is focus on the class killing the living. Giving them the undead subtype and giving them bane living because I don't see why a front line fighter should get sneak attack. Generally you give the class to much with no downside or restriction to it. They don't really need magic items for quite a long time... if they just have there Dex, Str, Con up then they are very broken..... e-mail me if you want more specifics ranterproductions@hotmail.com


Rating[edit]

Power - 1/5 I give this class a 1 out of 5 because of the armor and weapons you get.--"If a toy is broken you must fix it" 13:01, 13 May 2011 (MDT)

Wording - 1/5 I give this class a 3 out of 5 because It has okay wording but the overall overpowered nature overshadows it. --"If a toy is broken you must fix it" 13:01, 13 May 2011 (MDT)

Formatting - 1/5 I give this class a 1 out of 5 because --"If a toy is broken you must fix it" 13:01, 13 May 2011 (MDT)

Flavor - 4/5 I give this class a 4 out of 5 because The flavor is fine just the class --"If a toy is broken you must fix it" 13:01, 13 May 2011 (MDT)

This class is going to be heavily edited by me with the guidelines of the class already but feel free to stop me when ever....

Rating[edit]

Balance - 0/5 I give this class a 0 out of 5 because this prestige class is overpowered. The requirements for this class are not realistic enough for some of the abilities you gain. A bonus feat at every level and a weapon that has the potential for +20 to attack and damage rolls is way too powerful. --Angellic (talk) 17:44, 18 July 2013 (MDT)

Wording - 1/5 I give this class a 1 out of 5 because the words are a little unclear at points. For example, when supernatural abilities are given I don't understand when and how I can use them. --Angellic (talk) 17:44, 18 July 2013 (MDT)

Formatting - 2/5 I give this class a 2 out of 5 because the descriptions that follow the table do not follow logical progression. Several typos and some general punctuation are also not correct. --Angellic (talk) 17:44, 18 July 2013 (MDT)

Flavor - 4/5 I give this class a 4 out of 5 because there is enough information to make the bone knight feel like an existing class. It is just a shame that it comes across that more time was spent on the flavor text than on the actual class information. --Angellic (talk) 17:44, 18 July 2013 (MDT)

Personal tools
Home of user-generated,
homebrew, pages!
d20M
miscellaneous
admin area
Terms and Conditions for Non-Human Visitors