Talk:Atheismo (3.5e Deity)
From D&D Wiki
This is part of a Campaign I am making. I want to add flavor to it, without making that open content, but I have a handful of gods that I would allow to have open source stuff, but I want to make some of their specifics copyright and product identity. Atheismo is one of these. Any suggestions for what license I should use? Would the OGL work, the GFL (I'm thinking no) or should i just make it all product identity. Should i take him off the dandwiki?
- Note the wording under the text box whenever you hit "edit": Please note that all contributions to D&D Wiki are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here. That is to say, if you are claiming copyright over one of your works, do not upload it here. Marasmusine (talk) 01:06, 5 October 2012 (MDT)
- No, you misunderstand my point. I was wondering, under the terms of the GFL, if I could, have copyright culture X have something that included Atheismo. Would that make Culture X also under the GFL, and if so, how much of it would be under the GFL? Would the entire Culture be GFL'd or just the part with Atheismo, and would that make the Copyright Name of Culture X GFL'd? if this is yes, i would like to know how to include Atheismo in my Campaign, without entirely opensourcing my Campaign. May i dual copyright it with the CC BY, so it doesn't need to be copyleft?
- How about this, I release it under the GFL, and since it was originally published in a wiki, I can also release it under the CC-BY-SA, and I can waive the Share Alike and Remix parts, and do that. If this is legal, please tell me so. Of course, I would only do this to the parts that I have actually written. Am I correct in this thinking? Note that I don't want to come off as some jerk, I just want to make sure that some aspects of my campaign can be freely given while not hurting other parts of my copyright.
- Sounds fine to me, so long as you have no issue with the possibility of your works on this wiki being freely edited by other people. With regards the specifics of licensing, Green Dragon might be the person to speak to. Personally I just make all my works public domain and be done with it :)
- Yeah, I do that with a lot of my stuff, and i have no problems with Atheismo being editied (I enjoy it). Ok, thanks. However, i have done some research and i will just release it under the FDL and some other properitary license
- Sounds fine to me, so long as you have no issue with the possibility of your works on this wiki being freely edited by other people. With regards the specifics of licensing, Green Dragon might be the person to speak to. Personally I just make all my works public domain and be done with it :)
- How about this, I release it under the GFL, and since it was originally published in a wiki, I can also release it under the CC-BY-SA, and I can waive the Share Alike and Remix parts, and do that. If this is legal, please tell me so. Of course, I would only do this to the parts that I have actually written. Am I correct in this thinking? Note that I don't want to come off as some jerk, I just want to make sure that some aspects of my campaign can be freely given while not hurting other parts of my copyright.
- No, you misunderstand my point. I was wondering, under the terms of the GFL, if I could, have copyright culture X have something that included Atheismo. Would that make Culture X also under the GFL, and if so, how much of it would be under the GFL? Would the entire Culture be GFL'd or just the part with Atheismo, and would that make the Copyright Name of Culture X GFL'd? if this is yes, i would like to know how to include Atheismo in my Campaign, without entirely opensourcing my Campaign. May i dual copyright it with the CC BY, so it doesn't need to be copyleft?
