Talk:Alchemist (3.5e Prestige Class)

From D&D Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Dips[edit]

A 1-level dip in this class for an immediate +2 to intelligence is pretty much a no-brainer for every wizard ever. Surgo 00:00, 6 September 2008 (MDT)

I agree. I suggest that bonus be restricted to high levels in the class, or do like Loremaster and insist on a large Int or class level to obtain that power. -- Eiji 02:09, 6 September 2008 (MDT)
Well the class is playable all the way through. And you have to take a rather bad non-optimal feat. . --Lord Dhazriel 21:12, 20 May 2009 (MDT)

Can you take regular secrets at epic levels ? What are the epic only secrets ? Is the experience pool a discount for brewing potions only, or could it be aplied elsewhere ? --Frodosquall 14:27, 9 December 2009 (MST)

Rating[edit]

Power - 4/5 I give this class a 4 out of 5 because this classes balance is debatable. As both Surgo and Eiji pointed out above. → Rith (talk) 22:07, 20 April 2009 (MDT)

Wording - 4/5 I give this class a 4 out of 5 because the experience pool part of the table is never explained. → Rith (talk) 22:07, 20 April 2009 (MDT)

Formatting - 4.5/5 I give this class a 4.5 out of 5 because only one section is blank, though, interwiki linking is slightly lacking. → Rith (talk) 22:07, 20 April 2009 (MDT)

Flavor - 5/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because, really, I have yet to find a class that I found boring to read. Every one of them has been a 5 out of 5. → Rith (talk) 22:07, 20 April 2009 (MDT)


Rating[edit]

Power - <<<4>>>/5 I give this class a <<<4>>> out of 5 because <<<It is an immensely useful class>>> --98.202.146.98 22:12, 11 August 2009 (MDT)

Wording - <<<4>>>/5 I give this class a <<<4>>> out of 5 because <<<good, but i think a better name for the two "beauty" potions>>> --98.202.146.98 22:12, 11 August 2009 (MDT)

Formatting - <<<4>>>/5 I give this class a <<<4>>> out of 5 because <<<clear and simple, but a bit boring>>> --98.202.146.98 22:12, 11 August 2009 (MDT)

Flavor - <<<3>>>/5 I give this class a <<<3>>> out of 5 because <<>> --98.202.146.98 22:12, 11 August 2009 (MDT)

Rating[edit]

Power - 2/5 I give this class a 2 out of 5 because it seems too powerful in the benefits it gains, I would suggest spellcaster level increase every second level rather than every level, or maybe two out of three levels. --211.27.77.118 03:33, 13 December 2010 (MST)

Wording - 3/5 I give this class a 3 out of 5 because wording is vague and makes no reference to what the experience pool accumulated is for --211.27.77.118 03:33, 13 December 2010 (MST)

Formatting - 3/5 I give this class a 3 out of 5 because the grammar is not just poor, it is consistently poor --211.27.77.118 03:33, 13 December 2010 (MST)

Flavor - 3/5 I give this class a 3 out of 5 because the idea is good, but the class is unbalanced and there is not enough flavour in the descriptions, which are blunt and lacking in any reel feeling --211.27.77.118 03:33, 13 December 2010 (MST)

Personal tools
Home of user-generated,
homebrew, pages!
d20M
miscellaneous
admin area
Terms and Conditions for Non-Human Visitors