https://www.dandwiki.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&user=Maverick+Wolf&feedformat=atomD&D Wiki - User contributions [en]2024-03-29T11:09:11ZUser contributionsMediaWiki 1.35.8https://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Talk:Improved_Animal_Companion_(3.5e_Feat)&diff=122685Talk:Improved Animal Companion (3.5e Feat)2007-08-07T17:57:32Z<p>Maverick Wolf: </p>
<hr />
<div>This feat is completely broken. It's unbelievable how it ever got a power rating of 4.60. Want an example?<br />
<br />
Human Druid. Level 1. Take this feat with both your first level feat and your human bonus feat. Guess what, it stacks and there is no limit! <br />
<br />
Congratulations, you are now a first-level character who walks around with one of the following: <br />
* Bear, brown (animal)<br />
* Dire wolverine<br />
* Crocodile, giant (animal)<br />
* Deinonychus (dinosaur)<br />
* Dire ape<br />
* Dire boar<br />
* Dire wolf<br />
* Elasmosaurus1 (dinosaur)<br />
* Lion (animal)<br />
* Rhinoceros (animal)<br />
* Snake, Huge viper (animal)<br />
* Tiger (animal)<br />
My personal favorite is the rhinoceros for sheer hit points, but pretty much anything from the list will walk over any CR 1 encounter. I also like the wolf for its trip attack and the tiger for the combination of hide - charge - pounce - rake - improved grab, all in one round.<br />
<br />
Want to go insane, take flaws and keep taking this feat, your DM will ban this after one session anyway so why not enjoy the moment?<br />
<br />
For DMs who want to nerf the feat, try the following:<br />
* remove the possibility to take it multiple times<br />
* set maximum level = ECL<br />
This way, the feat does what it's supposed to do (help multiclassed characters and high-level rangers) without the potential abuse. --[[User:Mkill|Mkill]] 06:18, 19 June 2007 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:I concur. A +1 LEVEL ability is strong. A +3 LEVEL ability is overpowering. --[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 09:05, 9 July 2007 (MDT)<br />
<br />
::I notified Siegfried of the NBoF about it and he agreed. It seems likely that they will change this feat for the next edition. --[[User:Mkill|Mkill]] 09:09, 9 July 2007 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:::I'd like to additionally point out that a similar feat now exists as an official WotC feat, that only increases the AC's strength up to your character level, that's designed for multiclassing. I don't see this as balanced in any other way. --[[User:Maverick_Wolf|Maverick_Wolf]] 13:56, 08 August 2007 (EST)</div>Maverick Wolfhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Talk:Spellfire_Warrior_(3.5e_Class)&diff=122683Talk:Spellfire Warrior (3.5e Class)2007-08-07T17:53:38Z<p>Maverick Wolf: </p>
<hr />
<div>== Rip-Off ==<br />
<br />
This is just a Rip-off of the Spellfire Channeler PrC in Magic of Faerun which if I rember correctly is not OGL. -The Class Ninja {{Unsigned|65.80.148.63|00:59, 10 March 2006 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
:Not Quite. This class is actually a combination of the Spellfire Channeler and the Spellfire Heirophant, with additional abilities of my own making. While said classes are not OGL, they're abilities can be used in other OGL things. Using their abilities in another class does not in any way give someone the necessary stats to play one. And I find the term 'rip-off' rather offensive really. Most custom classes use abilities from other classes that have already been published. It's entirely normal. I felt the PrCs presented for Spellfire were utterly lacking and decided I wanted a Spellfire-based core class. I didn't rip-off anything. - Maverick Wolf {{Unsigned|71.245.41.105|22:10, 18 March 2006 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
::My sentiments exactly.<br />
<br />
::When I make varient classes, I tend to just see what the base class that I'm building off of is, and then build straight from there and edit it as I go along. Its simpler for me to think of my classes as "builds" rather than classes, at least untill I'm finished with them.<br />
<br />
::The Spellfire Warrior is cool, but he's not my style. He seems more of a retributive character, and very reactive. "You get hit with blah." "Ha, I send it back for blah damage.". Not really my idea of a go-to character, but thats just my opinion.<br />
<br />
::(Forgot to log in before I changed the page, sorry for any confusion, although I doubt there was any)<br />
<br />
::''Lord_Canius'' {{Unsigned|Lord Canius|02:39, 19 March 2006 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
== Hit dice??? ==<br />
<br />
Maybe I'm just missing it, yet I can't see which HD he uses.<br />
<br />
Some more fighter feat instead of spellfire focused one could improve the idea of "warrior" his name conveys...<br />
<br />
--Third Eye-- {{Unsigned|84.221.198.36|14:08, 28 January 2007 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
:I cannot find it either, would HD would you recommend for this class? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 13:11, 28 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::The Hit Dice can be found under the Class Abilities section, which apparently got a little clumped together and has now been separated. It uses a d8. --[[User:Maverick Wolf|Maverick Wolf]] 09:57, 1 March 2007 (EST)<br />
<br />
==Ignorance==<br />
<br />
I went to rate this class and relized i have no idea what most of the abilities are. It sounds like Wheel of Time, but ive never read em (not that i dont want to) so i dont know whats going on. It would help if this was more informed or links were set so ignorant people like me may understand ^o^ ==[[User:Alabastor|Alabastor]] 08:30, 20 April 2007 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:Hm... Seeing that this was added by an IP the abilities are not going to be explained by the author (most likely). So, can anyone decipher them? Does anyone want to spend the time deciphering them and re-writing them? If so, please do! --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 13:31, 22 April 2007 (MDT)<br />
<br />
::It's likely that the confusion in what the abilities are is related to the fact that this relies on Spellfire, which in a non-Open Game ability from the Forgotten Realms. As such, I cannot reproduce the abilities this is derived from. Spellfire is vaguely described in the Forgotten Realms Campaign Setting and a bit better detailed in Magic of Faerun. There is also a series of Spellfire novels, dealing with the only currently known Spellfire Wielder in Faerun.--[[User:Maverick Wolf|Maverick_Wolf]] 13:52, 08 August 2007 (EST)</div>Maverick Wolfhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Talk:Spellfire_Warrior_(3.5e_Class)&diff=122682Talk:Spellfire Warrior (3.5e Class)2007-08-07T17:53:01Z<p>Maverick Wolf: /* Ignorance */</p>
<hr />
<div>== Rip-Off ==<br />
<br />
This is just a Rip-off of the Spellfire Channeler PrC in Magic of Faerun which if I rember correctly is not OGL. -The Class Ninja {{Unsigned|65.80.148.63|00:59, 10 March 2006 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
:Not Quite. This class is actually a combination of the Spellfire Channeler and the Spellfire Heirophant, with additional abilities of my own making. While said classes are not OGL, they're abilities can be used in other OGL things. Using their abilities in another class does not in any way give someone the necessary stats to play one. And I find the term 'rip-off' rather offensive really. Most custom classes use abilities from other classes that have already been published. It's entirely normal. I felt the PrCs presented for Spellfire were utterly lacking and decided I wanted a Spellfire-based core class. I didn't rip-off anything. - Maverick Wolf {{Unsigned|71.245.41.105|22:10, 18 March 2006 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
::My sentiments exactly.<br />
<br />
::When I make varient classes, I tend to just see what the base class that I'm building off of is, and then build straight from there and edit it as I go along. Its simpler for me to think of my classes as "builds" rather than classes, at least untill I'm finished with them.<br />
<br />
::The Spellfire Warrior is cool, but he's not my style. He seems more of a retributive character, and very reactive. "You get hit with blah." "Ha, I send it back for blah damage.". Not really my idea of a go-to character, but thats just my opinion.<br />
<br />
::(Forgot to log in before I changed the page, sorry for any confusion, although I doubt there was any)<br />
<br />
::''Lord_Canius'' {{Unsigned|Lord Canius|02:39, 19 March 2006 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
== Hit dice??? ==<br />
<br />
Maybe I'm just missing it, yet I can't see which HD he uses.<br />
<br />
Some more fighter feat instead of spellfire focused one could improve the idea of "warrior" his name conveys...<br />
<br />
--Third Eye-- {{Unsigned|84.221.198.36|14:08, 28 January 2007 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
:I cannot find it either, would HD would you recommend for this class? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 13:11, 28 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::The Hit Dice can be found under the Class Abilities section, which apparently got a little clumped together and has now been separated. It uses a d8. --[[User:Maverick Wolf|Maverick Wolf]] 09:57, 1 March 2007 (EST)<br />
<br />
==Ignorance==<br />
<br />
I went to rate this class and relized i have no idea what most of the abilities are. It sounds like Wheel of Time, but ive never read em (not that i dont want to) so i dont know whats going on. It would help if this was more informed or links were set so ignorant people like me may understand ^o^ ==[[User:Alabastor|Alabastor]] 08:30, 20 April 2007 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:Hm... Seeing that this was added by an IP the abilities are not going to be explained by the author (most likely). So, can anyone decipher them? Does anyone want to spend the time deciphering them and re-writing them? If so, please do! --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 13:31, 22 April 2007 (MDT)<br />
<br />
::It's likely that the confusion in what the abilities are is related to the fact that this relies on Spellfire, which in a non-Open Game ability from the Forgotten Realms. As such, I cannot reproduce the abilities this is derived from. Spellfire is vaguely described in the Forgotten Realms Campaign Setting and a bit better detailed in Magic of Faerun. There is also a series of Spellfire novels, dealing with the only currently known Spellfire Wielder in Faerun.--[[User:Maverick Wolf|Maverick Wolf]] 13:52, 08 August 2007 (EST)</div>Maverick Wolfhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=User:Maverick_Wolf&diff=82698User:Maverick Wolf2007-03-01T15:12:19Z<p>Maverick Wolf: Removing all content from page</p>
<hr />
<div></div>Maverick Wolfhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=User:Maverick_Wolf&diff=82697User:Maverick Wolf2007-03-01T15:12:06Z<p>Maverick Wolf: New page: {| style="border: solid 2px #445566; background-color: #D0FFD0; margin: 0; width: 100%;" |valign="top"| {| style="margin: 10px auto; background-color: transparent;" |valign="top" | {{User:...</p>
<hr />
<div>{| style="border: solid 2px #445566; background-color: #D0FFD0; margin: 0; width: 100%;"<br />
|valign="top"|<br />
{| style="margin: 10px auto; background-color: transparent;"<br />
|valign="top" |<br />
{{User:Maverick Wolf/About}}<br />
{{User:Maverick Wolf/Contact}}<br />
{{User:Maverick Wolf/Credits}}<br />
{{User:Maverick Wolf/Milestones}}<br />
|valign="top" |<br />
{{User:Maverick Wolf/Contribs}}<br />
{{User:Maverick Wolf/ToDo}}<br />
|}</div>Maverick Wolfhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Green_Dragon&diff=82696User talk:Green Dragon2007-03-01T15:06:26Z<p>Maverick Wolf: /* Wikify? */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{Messages of Interest|messages=<br />
{{MoI-Row<br />
|page=User talk:Sledged<br />
|section= NPCs Based on the Admins of The D&D Wiki<br />
|notifier=Sledged<br />
|date_time=14:56, 23 December 2006 (MST)<br />
}}<br />
{{MoI-Row<br />
|page=Darkfire Guild Wizard (DnD Prestige Class)<br />
|section=adding it too homebrew with descriptions.<br />
|notifier=Calidore Chase<br />
|date_time=15:04, 10 January 2007<br />
}}<br />
{{MoI-Row<br />
|page=Talk:Improved Natural Attack (SRD Feat)<br />
|section=Charting the changes?<br />
|notifier=Calidore Chase<br />
|date_time=10:27, 19 January 2007<br />
}}<br />
{{MoI-Row<br />
|page=Talk:Plating Canister (DnD Equipment)<br />
|section=Understanding<br />
|notifier=Cypresslyshra<br />
|date_time= 18:44 22.1.07<br />
}}<br />
{{MoI-Row<br />
|page=User talk:Sledged<br />
|section=New Materials<br />
|notifier=Sledged<br />
|date_time=[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] 13:16, 26 January 2007 (MST)<br />
}}<br />
{{MoI-Row<br />
|page=Talk:Alcoholic (DnD Flaw)<br />
|section=<br />
|notifier=Cypresslyshra<br />
|date_time= 20:57, 31 January 2007 (MST)<br />
}}<br />
{{MoI-Row<br />
|page=Talk:Brawler (DnD Class)<br />
|section=Fix 'Create New Base Class' template<br />
|notifier=Sledged<br />
|date_time=10:51, 10 February 2007 (MST)<br />
}}<br />
{{MoI-Row<br />
|page=SRD Talk:Trap Sense (Epic Feat)<br />
|notifier=Sledged<br />
|date_time=12:05, 27 February 2007 (MST)<br />
}}<br />
{{MoI-Row<br />
|page=Talk:Main Page<br />
|section=Proposed Color Scheme #3.1<br />
|notifier=EldritchNumen<br />
|date_time=15:16, 28 February 2007 (MST)<br />
}}<br />
<br />
}}<br />
<br />
{{Archives<br />
|label1= Archive 1 (Discussions 1 &ndash; 30)<br />
|label2= Archive 2 (Discussions 31 &ndash; 60)<br />
|label3= Archive 3 (Discussions 61 &ndash; 90)<br />
}}<br />
<br />
== New Message of Interest Template ==<br />
<br />
What do you think of the new template? If you remove the nested Template:MoI-Row the table gets hidden like so:<br />
{{Messages of Interest|messages=<br />
<br />
}}<br />
So it only shows up if there are messages. &mdash;[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] 11:29, 15 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
:It is amazing. Great idea, and I have already implemented it at a couple of locations. Thanks for this idea. Also, please see [[Template talk:Messages of Interest#How to use]] for something I said about it... Anyway, great idea, much better than the current system. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 02:25, 16 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Wikimedia Donations ==<br />
<br />
I see Wikimedia is doing their year end donation drive. How would you feel in regards to something on the front page directing users to their donation site? --[[User:Xenophon|Xenophon]] 06:33, 18 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
:Hm... I don't really know... I'm not affiliated/related to the site, etc. I don't really see why I should... Maybe D&D Wiki's own [[D&D Wiki:Site support|fundrasing campaign]] (jk - Also that is the page that Blue Dragon has edited the most (I think he wants a free server from Donations that would help Tundra (the current server) running D&D Wiki ''':)''' ))... What would you recommend? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 16:07, 18 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
::I understand that we are a smaller user base and definitely don't have the pool of resources to draw from that Wikimedia does. It does seem reasonable that if anyone has just a bit of money to donate they should allocate that money to the more needy source. Wikimedia provides the core of this site. Any way you look at it we all owe something back. I'm not saying we should all pour money into or else we're stealing. That's the beauty of the GPL is that anyone, even those lacking ANY funds, can use it. It might just be my opinion, but I feel that by virtue of you using MediaWiki associates you in a way with Wikimedia. In writing this another thought came to mind in regards to having our own drive locally. We can solicit donations, pay for some server costs and then pass up something as D&D Wiki to Wikimedia. I feel that contributing as a group speaks more about us than if the same amount was contributed individually. MediaWiki is what the web was meant to be. It gives the voice to the people, creating a cable public access station as if it had the resources of the entire world. I apologize for the length of this. This is really a culmination of my thoughts, finally consolidated. I really am much more cynical than I seem idealist. I find this whole thing fascinating and exciting but at the same time I worry for its future, not just monetarily. Yes, I am being an evangelist but it is for something once in my life I totally understand and feel some real passion about... Besides D&D. --[[User:Xenophon|Xenophon]] 15:42, 19 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::I agree with you. I like the idea of having out own drive, then donating half to MediaWiki. Thanks for the idea, and I will get Blue Dragon to work on it soon. Thanks so much for this idea, and possibly Blue Dragon can get another server for this site, and this site can say "Thank you" to MediaWiki... --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 15:47, 19 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::We did not get the donation drive out in time for help with the wikimedia drive, but still, if we more than enough to buy more RAM we will give the rest to wikimedia. So, [[HardwarePurchase1|donate]] if you would like (I know you may have been put off my [[Talk:Main Page]], but please don't listen to that; Blue Dragon just got carried away... Please forgive and forget, don't let Blue Dragon give you problems...) --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 10:54, 29 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Feedback + FR Wiki ==<br />
<br />
I recently came across this wiki by accident but I wanted to say it is excellent, if underpopulated, and I think its relative lack of promotion or awareness is to blame. I am an editor at [http://forgottenrealms.wikia.com Forgotten Realms wiki] and although our wikis do not necessarily cross paths (FR-wiki is a glorified reference to FR source material), there are opportunities to interact, so I thought I would link to D&D Wiki articles where they exist, instead of other places, and even contribute here where necessary. [[User:Fw190a8|Fw190a8]] 19:58, 18 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
:A couple things. First off, my wiki is not underpopulated (compare [http://www.dandwiki.com/wiki/Special:Statistics this] to [http://forgottenrealms.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Statistics this])... Anyway, not trying to get off to a bad start (I have just had a problem with a different "merger" a while back). So, what exactly are you proposing? So we understand each others wikis better, I have started with a comparison. First off, I like that your<small>(?)</small> Wiki has been around for a while, I will say quite a bit longer than mine (Yours founded on 11 October 2005, mine on February 4th 2006). Also, the edits to your wiki are still coming, even though it is not very popular (only 3,657 page views since October 11 2005, whereas mine has 616,691 page views since February 4th 2006). Also, you have quite the user-base, whereas since D&D Wiki is so new it is lacking that (D&D Wiki has under 200 users, you have a very large amount (e.g. Green Dragon is already taken)). I would say our wikis are about the same (not content wise, but statistically speaking...). So, again, what exactly would you like to happen? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 23:49, 18 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
:: ''':)''' We may have a small user-base, but we are proud, noble, dedicated folk... ''':)''' --[[User:EldritchNumen|EldritchNumen]] 04:05, 19 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::Agreed. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 14:55, 19 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
== New Archives Template ==<br />
<br />
What do you think of the new [[Template:Archives|archives template]] using the [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:LoopFunctions loop functions extension] [[User:Blue Dragon|Blue Dragon]] installed? There's a demo of it in my [[User talk:Sledged|talk page]].<br />
<br />
The first paramter ''n'' specifies how many archive pages there are. The rest of the parameters (''label1'', ''label2'', ''label3'', etc...) specify the link text. &mdash;[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] 13:40, 19 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
:I think I might be getting carried away... &mdash;[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] 13:41, 19 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
::I like it... Would you mind implementing it where archives are? I am asking you because I have yet to take the time to fully understand it... --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 14:52, 19 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
== New SRD Landing Page is Up==<br />
<br />
I plopped the new SRD landing page in this morning. Thanks a zillion. The new page looks great. --[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 07:46, 20 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
:Agreed, it is much better than the old SRD page. Good job, and thanks for doing that. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 15:40, 20 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
==RE:Welcome to D&D Wiki==<br />
<br />
'''Green Dragon wrote:'''<br />
<br />
''Hello LoneLobo, and welcome to D&D Wiki! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like D&D Wiki and decide to stay. I am the owner of the site, and if you have a question feel free to ask me, however when contacting anyone on D&D Wiki through talk pages please sign your name using four tildes ([[User:LoneLobo|LoneLobo]] 00:29, 21 December 2006 (MST)); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Also, if you want to help D&D Wiki but just don't know how drop me a note and I'll see what I can do. However, when dropping me a note please tell me how much time you would like to spend working, how well you know the Wiki Format, and how well you know D&D. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a D&D Wikian! If you need help ask me on my talk page, or just right here. Again, welcome! --Green Dragon 23:31, 20 December 2006 (MST)''<br />
<br />
:Green Dragon, Thank you for your warm welcome. The D&D Wiki is a great resource, you should definintely be proud of the accomplishment. I only found the site yesterday, and I still haven't been able to look through most of the great content. I know the Wiki format fairly well, but on other Wikis, I've never created articles from scratch, though I have editted many. D&D has been my passion for nearly ten years, and in the past few years I've mostly DM'd campaigns, with the exception of RPGA events, although I have been working on becoming GM certified with the RPGA. I hope I'll be able to contribute positively to the D&D Wiki, though it seems a lot of information has already been covered. I'm really interested in your Wikiworld Campaign Setting project, and as soon as I finish reading all of the source material, I think I've got a pretty decent idea to help the project along; though I'd like to get an idea for how many people are already actively using the project's campaign setting in games they're running. Again, thank you for your welcome. [[User:LoneLobo|LoneLobo]] 00:29, 21 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
::No problem, my pleasure. Anyway, your contributions to the wikiworld have been very good so far. I dont think you are changing the idea of it, it only looks better than before. About the "Uses": I am sure quite a bit of people are using it, however no one has said such a thing. People never say if they use things from this site, but I know people are because D&D Wiki just keeps gettimg more and more visitors.... Glad you like the site so much and Merry Christmas. I look forward to your contributions. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 08:39, 21 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Thanks for the Help ==<br />
<br />
Well it's almost Christmas again and social matters tend to take control for a few days and I just wanted to say '''Thank you for the warm welcome and the help!'''<br />
DandDwiki is definitely the greatest source for game material I have found and I already know I'll use a lot of it in the coming year.<br />
So the only thing that's left is to say: '''Merry Christmas and a happy new year!, Keep up the good work!''' --[[User:Ymir|Ymir]] 01:28, 21 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
:Merry Christmas to you as well, and I wish you a happy new year. Thanks for putting up all you things so far, and updating the feats. Your CS is beginging to look very good. '''Merry Christmas''' as well. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 08:39, 21 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Help Please! ==<br />
<br />
I noticed how the NPC page got changed around and got reorganized. Nice job on it. I was planning on contributing some new NPC's tonight but I am having trouble editing in order to put in new entries. Little help please? --[[User:rowsdower44|rowsdower44]] 18:18, 23 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
:Adding NPC's is '''easier''' than before. Go to [[Add a New DnD NPC]] and follow the discussion. The new CR's are all dynamic (using DPL's) so just make sure your new NPC is part of [[:Category:DnD]], [[:Category:User]], [[:Category:NPC]], and Category:CR----your CR here---. This will make your NPC show on the correct CR page ''when you have saved your NPC''. I hope you like this method, and I am glad it looks better. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 17:35, 23 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Google Custom Search ==<br />
<br />
I don't know if this problem is exclusive to me, but I now have a little bar under my Navigation box that says "Google Custom Search", which would not be a problem, save for the fact that the 'Search' button extends into whatever text I am reading. Along the same lines, the search and Toolbox sections have been shunted to the bottom, and shrunk down to 5pt font. Am I simply the owner of a F***ed up machine? {{Unsigned|Cypresslyshra|17:21, 23 December 2006 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
:Not at all... [[User:Blue Dragon|Blue Dragon]] wanted to add Google search to D&D Wiki, then stopped adding it for the day telling me "It wont show up on anyones computer!" So, I believed him, seeing that it never showed up on my PC. Now, however, it appears that it ''has'' shown up on other computers... Thanks for bringing this up to me and I will tell Blue Dragon about this problem later (I cannot contact him for a bit). Sorry for this problem, and it will be fixed later. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 17:40, 23 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
::Don't worry yourself too much with it, it's just a touch of a nusance more than a crippling error.--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 17:48, 23 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::That makes me feel better... I thought this was a major problem, one that made it so it was very hard to see what is happening on a certain page. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 17:50, 23 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
== MSRD ==<br />
<br />
Yes, I am posting the MSRD. It's my "wife's away" project. This time, I get to apply all my lessons learned from the SRD. My plan is to post the basic conversions then let others organize it from there. Whether someone else actually picks that up may or may not happens. (I keep telling myself that I will stop fiddling with it. Yeah, right. But it will be secondary unless the MSRD keeps impressing me. Dang they did a good design job on that game.) <br />
<br />
Merry new year. --[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 04:35, 1 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:Thanks, Merry New Year to you as well, even though it is a little late. Anyway, I have to agree D20M is like the better version of D&D, all the problems are worked out (makes one wonder what 4e will be like...). Also, the MSRD is looking very good, and it shows that you have already done this ''':)'''. Anyway, I hope you finish this before your wife gets back and makes you quit adding the MSRD (quit? Well...). It's looking good. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 23:12, 2 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::The wife is VERY supportive of my wiki work. Having done all that organizing and work on the SRD, putting this thing in was a breeze. It's also far smaller than the SRD. The merging of materials is going quite quickly. I also have ideas for possible improvements. I should be able to mine Wikipedia for images of modern equipment. --[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 09:29, 10 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::I like the images that you have added so far, they are relevant and good. Also, thanks so much for adding the MSRD, it was needed for quite some tim. Also, another barnstar is coming your way when your done ''':)'''. Thanks. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 14:45, 10 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== the poladar dude ==<br />
<br />
hey thanks a bunch for ur help i could really use it because i really want to make a cool race people can use in D &D but i know almost nothing about D & D so i just want to no if there are turns in D & D cause if their are then my rush ability will work great Rush: ability for any poladar to travel 30 feet instead of 22 for 3 turns (can use twice a day) {{Unsigned|66.214.70.113|00:06, 3 January 2007 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
:First off, please post this on the [[Poladar (DnD Race)|Poladar]] discussion ([[Talk:Poladar (DnD Race)|here]]), then we can look at it and evaluate it. Thanks for your understanding, but user-pages are not the place to post information that is intended only for a certain race. Also, FYI, you should get a user-account as then the creations will be under your name forever and I can post messages on your user-talk alerting you of changes that may interest you. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 23:10, 2 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== SVG Files ==<br />
<br />
Is it possible to upload SVG files, and have wiki automatically convert it on the fly to png? If so how do I do this, when I tried to upload an SVG it said it was not a recommended format, I did not see a way to force it to go. I noticed in the uploaded files area you have a couple that are .svg.png.<br />
<br />
Anyway, thanks for the greet, I will try to contribute a little bit when I can. --[[User:StarStrike|StarStrike]] 23:22, 2 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:You cannot have it automatically change it to a .png. Just override the message and upload it anyway, making sure to convert the file to .png beforehand. I hope this is not to much of an inconvenience, and if it is that much of an inconvenience I can have [[user:Blue Dragon]] program an extension that does what you are asking for. Would you like an extension added that does this, or would you prefer to just change the file format outside of D&D Wiki? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 23:45, 2 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::That is fine, I can convert it beforehand, I thought it might of been a bit easier for other users to edit an SVG as opposed to a PNG or other similar format. --[[User:StarStrike|StarStrike]] 07:12, 3 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::Even though that may be true, it is very hard to get around some of the limitations to MediaWiki. Sorry that it is not possible to convert files on the site. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 14:35, 3 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Wikifiying old spells ==<br />
<br />
I still have in my possession an old ADnD spell book, which I occasionally look at for reference. It would be plagurism to post them as my own, but some of them are really good wizard spells. Where would they go? --[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 17:51, 3 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:Sadly, you cannot post them on D&D Wiki, as they are not released under the OGL (Open Gaming License). For something to be allowed to be distributed that was made by a company it has be released under the OGL. The only reason the SRD is allowed to be here is because the SRD is released under the OGL. Old spells are not allowed just like classes from WotC 3.5e books are not allowed. Sorry, but laws are laws and I don't want D&D Wiki violating copyright problems. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 18:20, 3 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::Quite alright, that's why I asked first.--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 18:24, 3 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::BTW, thanks for asking first... It's bad when a user (this has happened before) just posts copyrighted material... Thanks for asking. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 18:26, 3 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::<nowiki>*</nowiki>Whistles innocently* --[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 18:30, 3 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::::Was that really you? I could not place my finger on who did it before, I just remember it happened.... Oh well, no worries. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 18:31, 3 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::::Just the Grue was mine. And I think I asked for that one to be removed.--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 18:33, 3 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::::::Oh, so the class that was posted on D&D Wiki from the PHB II was not you... I know about the Grue, but that was not really that bad. Spending the time to directly copy a class from the PHB II, then having it deleted right after it is posted on D&D Wiki is bad. I felt bad for the IP that did that, but copyrights are copyrights... The Grue was not bad. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 18:37, 3 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::You post an article about how to convert old spells. My question is could you get away with posting only the parts of the spell have to be changed to fit d20, like an update booklet. It wouldn't be the whole spell, so a reader would still have to have the reference source on hand for it to be usable. &mdash;[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] 10:25, 4 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
==The Illandians==<br />
I have a tribe of humans, who played a great role in previous campaigns. I was wondering if there was a place to put information on the tribe and their village? {{Unsigned|Cypresslyshra|22:08, 4 January 2007 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
:The best place would be [[DnD Campaign Settings]], if you modify it a bit. You would have to more describe their location, and not just the tribe, to make it fit as a Campaign Setting. However, this would be the best place. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 22:24, 4 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::I shall do that then. --[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 22:25, 4 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::Good. I look forward to seeing these "Illandians"... --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 22:29, 4 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::Done. [[The Illandian Desert (DnD Campaign Setting)]]--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 11:10, 5 January 2007 (MST)<br />
::::Amendum: I just found the information on specific tribemen, I'll be adding those shortly<br />
<br />
:::::Okay. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 15:59, 5 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
==SRD Spells==<br />
I was dregging through the spell section, and found it was less than useful if you were looking spells for a specific level.<br />
<br />
I would be willing to orgainize the spells into level catagories, if I could find out how to do so.--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 12:51, 5 January 2007 (MST)<br />
Amdendum: Scratch that, just found the Class-level list. Delete this message.<br />
<br />
:Glad you found it. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 14:47, 5 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::Spells by level is a true categorization nightmare, especially as they shift about levels by class.--[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 09:15, 10 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::Agreed, that is why I am not sure of a good way to categorize spells with dlpc's and have them work with the SRD's categories. Spells are a very hard dilemma. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 14:48, 10 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::Well, this may be the stupidest thing I ever offer to do, but if you guys want, I could give you a hand with organizing them. I know we already have class-level-spell lists, but perhaps we should just place those at the top, so that people can find them easily?--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 22:27, 10 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::::Go for it. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 21:13, 20 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::::Problem. Finally got around to it, but found that the page that I'm attempting to add the links to the Class Spell lists was protected by the OGL. Curiouser and curiouserer--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 21:08, 29 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::::::I am a little confused, could you please re-explain it? What page are you trying to add spells to again? If the page is SRD no DnD spells should be added. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 21:56, 29 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::::::The question I originally had was if I could place the links to Class Spells at the begining of the SRD spell page, so that there would be links to Bard, Ranger, Druid, Wizard, and Cleric spell list at the top. We already have the lists, but they're all mixed in.--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 22:01, 29 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::::::::Thats not possible because of the OGL and how the SRD works. Sorry. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 22:06, 29 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::::::::Ok, as long as that's clear. I was wondering.--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 22:12, 29 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::::::::::No problem... I wish their was not such a large gap between the SRD and the DnD material as well. Oh well, nothing I can do about it. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 22:14, 29 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Ghost monk ==<br />
I'm probably bringing this to the wrong person, but I was wondering if you could possibly give me a hand.<br />
<br />
I entered in an old prestige class, the ghost monk, from old documentation. I'm fairly certain I got them right, but I'm worried that some of the things that make the class workable in the past make it overpowered now. --[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 22:43, 10 January 2007 (MST)<br />
Amendum: If this is in the wrong place, feel free to delete it from your talk page.<br />
<br />
:What are you asking exactly...? I am a little confused... --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 22:53, 10 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::I was asking if you would rate the balance, but right now it seems I need some caffine. My mind is fuzzing out.--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 22:57, 10 January 2007 (MST)<br />
::Amendum: Sorry bout the confusion, I wasn't entirely cognizant.<br />
<br />
:::Can do. I will also ask a couple other people to rate it as well so the rating is more correct. This is no problem. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 23:08, 10 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::: I'm just not usually entirely happy with asking people to do work, but thank you Sooo much.--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 23:11, 10 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::::No problem, I don't mind helping people on D&D Wiki at all. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 23:22, 10 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== copyright ==<br />
<br />
hello, I'm back again and just read your message about the pictures in my CS, and indeed most where from the art galleries from WotC, so to make sure you and DanDwiki are not getting into trouble I immediately removed all images (except the cosmology, I made that in paint myself) sorry if I caused any inconvenience. [[User:Ymir|Ymir]] 02:18, 11 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:Shouldn't be much of a problem now that you deleted certain ones. Thanks for taking the initiative. Also, was the one with a buffalo a copyright violation? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 20:24, 11 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::no it was a private picture made by a relative, but in the interest of not putting this site in problems I still removed it, I'm working on a few private pictures to describe the planes in my cosmology. --[[User:Ymir|Ymir]] 02:39, 15 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::Okay. I deleted all the pictures, however if you want a non-copyright one to be on just tell me and I will un-delete it. Thanks. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 09:13, 15 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== (another) Question ==<br />
<br />
Hello i'm just getting back into my campaign setting and was wondering something...<br />
Some of my deity's from [[The Test of Time (DnD Campaign Setting)]] have been inserted into the general DnD Deity's and I was wondering how to do that, since the layout turns out ok and more people can use my creations.<br />
Now I tried a few times but it always comes up different then when someone else did it and I would like to keep 1 format for my campaign.<br />
any help is welcomed!<br />
<br />
{{Unsigned|Ymir|09:35, 16 January 2007 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
:Just add the appropriate category (DnD, User, Deity) and it will show up. Its all in the categories. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 15:40, 16 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== dlpc or Balance Template ==<br />
<br />
I was just looking at the Homebrew Prestige Class with Description page and noticed that the table was much larger and seemed to simply not to be reading the classes correctly. So, I went and tried to see what I could do to fix it (if anything) - I think that the table is having a problem reading the names from the [Balance Template|Template:PrC Balance], as the names that are outside the table had all had that template applied to them as opposed to the dlpc template. I don't know for sure, but I could understand if it would work if we got all of them to use it, so I thought I'd check and see which is supposed to be used. [[User:Passer|Passer]] 04:06, 20 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:Honestly, the DLPC does ''not'' work via templates. Soon all the PrC's will be converted back to the DPLC's, and the Balance Template will not include the DLPC. For right now make your PrC using both, it might work... --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 21:12, 20 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
==(Character) Flaws==<br />
<br />
Since I'm not sure if it's technically part of the rules anymore, if I wanted to include charater flaws(Agrophobia, Hypocondria), where would I put them?--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 18:26, 23 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:[[DnD Other]] I would say, unless they are specific to a certain section than put them under that section. However, for common fears (Agrophobia, Hypocondria, etc) [[DnD Other]] is the place. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 22:07, 23 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::Okay, I'll do that--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 22:23, 23 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::Watch out though, if its a feat it really should go under [[DnD Feats]] (looking at [[Talk:Plating Canister (DnD Equipment)]]), etc. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 22:26, 23 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::That's the thing. It's sort of an Anti-feat, like adding negitive one to the equation. Not certain how well it would fit into the Feats section.--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 22:30, 23 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::::I would say make a new section called "Anti-Feats" or "Negative Feats" and add your feats to that new section you would have just created. Does this sound like it would work, or would it confuse people...? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 22:39, 23 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::::I'd include a little primer at the begining of the page, to aleviate the confusion? I'd be happy to do the work on filling it in it, if we started that up. I'd have to make a note, they don't all give you feats. The OCD flaw, for example, allows the character to automatically pass all spot checks, but they need to make a will save (DC 18) every turn that they don't examine the enviroment, taking a -2 on all rolls if they fail.--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 22:47, 23 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::::::Okay, here is what you need to do to fit this into D&D Wiki perfectly. Make it a variant rule. And, on the variant rule page briefly explain what this is than give a link to all the things on D&D Wiki that follow this variant rule. On all the pages that follow this variant rule give them a little disclaimer saying something like "This is related to ______________ variant rule, and will work with normal D&D Rules easily, see _______________ for how to implement this into your campaign." Next add all the feats to the list on your variant rule page ''and'' on [[DnD Feats]] in a good spot (Possibly your own little section, general, or variant, etc). This should work. If I did not makse sense basically just make the item, link it like normal and add a little disclamer linking to your variant rule which would also have a list of all the items that work with this variant. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 22:57, 23 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::::::I shall do that then. Now to go finish the Forgotten Panthion...(Kekeke)--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 23:00, 23 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::::::::*Phew* so it made sense... --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 23:07, 23 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::::::::[[Character Flaws (DnD Variant Rule)]] Thar it be. I'm leaning towards a section dedicated just to flaws, to see if anyone else has some good ones. Besides, I think I have enough for a section.--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 15:57, 24 January 2007 (MST)<br />
:::::::::::Amendum: I just realized I pretty much posted that entire section straight from Documentation, so I'm not sure how up to date it is. I declare Meh.--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 21:28, 24 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::::::::::I would just say update it as you go along, make sure it is all 3.5e material when done... --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 23:11, 24 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::::::::::::I've been half-way watching this discussion (I haven't read every part of it), but if you're using the character flaws variant from [http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=products/dndacc/881560000 Unearthed Arcana], it should be noted that that book contains a lot of OGC. I think it might be a good idea if someone were transcribe the OGC rules from it. I've been thinking about putting it on my TODO list, but I have no idea when I might get my hands on a copy or have to the time to completely port it. &mdash;[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 10:47, 2 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::::::::::::No, this isn't the flaw system from unearthed Arcana. This is a system that my own DM invented, sort of as a trade off system. He wanted to use it because he had descided that characters were getting too perfect.--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 20:45, 2 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::::::::::::::Tuning in late ... It looks to me like your DM independently invented a system much like the UA system, although his is a bit more elaborate (e.g. severity levels, prerequisites). My recommendation:<br />
::::::::::::::::*Include UA and homebrew together in one place, making sure UA flaws are licensed as OGL.<br />
::::::::::::::::*Move flaws to their own section, parallel with feats, skills, etc.<br />
::::::::::::::::*Start a new conversation thread so I don't wear out my : key. ;)<br />
:::::::::::::::--[[User:Cuthalion|Cúthalion]] 10:00, 13 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::Having never read the UA flaws, I wouldn't know how to intigrate them in, but if someone wants to add the UA flaws, they would need to make their own section, since I assume they operate under a different ruleset than [[Character Flaws (DnD Variant Rule)]]--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 11:40, 13 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::I'm pretty sure [http://www.d20srd.org/srd/variant/buildingCharacters/characterFlaws.htm UA] uses a subset of the rules you use. I'd be happy to confirm and make the changes if you like (and if no one else objects). --[[User:Cuthalion|Cúthalion]] 11:46, 13 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::If they use the same rules I think it would be very nice to integrate them together. Do they use the same rules? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 22:59, 13 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== skills ==<br />
<br />
This is just a general question I need an answer to. Do you have to be trained by someone in skills that do not allow you to use them untrained? Like say I'm a paladin and want to learn knowledge (religion) which is a skill I cannot use without at least a rank of 1. Could I just invest skill points into this or do I have to have someone with knowledge in religion teach me or say read from a book? {{Unsigned|65.164.48.63|11:44, 28 January 2007 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
:A brief overview: there are two kinds of skills, Class Skills and non-class Skills. Every level a character gets a certain amount of skill ranks equal to their classes "Skills/Level" + their Int bonus. So, if they get 2 skills per level from their class, and have an int bonus of +3 they get 5 ranks. These ranks can be put in ''either'' their class skills or non-class skills. When a character puts a rank in a class skills they get a 1:1 ratio, one ranks in the skill gives them an additional +1. However, if they put a rank in a non-class skill they get a 1:2 ration, it takes 2 ranks go give a +1 in a certain skill. So, you can use any skill you like even if it is not a class skill they are just harder to get better at. Does this answer you question? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 13:02, 28 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::I understand that. What I meant was on the character sheets, the skills that have a black square next to them can be used untrained meaning that they can be used automatically without any ranks. What I'm asking is if the skills that don't have squares next to them can have rank added to them after you gain a level, or do you need to have someone teach you these skills so that you can invest points? In other words does someone have to train you to use the trained only skills? {{Unsigned|65.164.48.132|20:09, 28 January 2007 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
:::For the most part, that's the DM's call. There's nothing in the rules that says you have to have a tutor to put ranks in any skill. So unless your DM says otherwise, you can put ranks into any skill in which you haven't already invested skill points. &mdash;[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] 19:16, 28 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::Hm... I play that one ''cannot'' use those skills. Just my version... --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 19:22, 28 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::::The majority implementation of this is that when you gain a level, you can put ranks into anything by following the skill rules. DM's may alter mechanism this to fit their campaign. --[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 08:05, 10 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
==Anti-Vandal IP to be blocked...==<br />
<br />
66.56.255.79 has been vandalizing. A block is in order... --[[User:EldritchNumen|EldritchNumen]] 03:21, 10 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:Done, thanks for telling me about that. The IP is blocked for 2 weeks. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 11:52, 10 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== D20 PrC with descriptions==<br />
<br />
So, I tried updating [[User D20M Prestige Classes with Descriptions]], but the format of the template automatically converts the link to the page as (DnD Prestige Class) rather than (D20 Modern Prestige Class). We need to make a new dpl thingy header that doesn't do that. I don't know who to contact... so you seemed like a good bet! :) Sorry for my lack of knowledge in this code... <>[[User:EldritchNumen|EldritchNumen]] 01:32, 13 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:NM! I figured out how to do it myself. I created a new dplc template called D20M_PrC_Description, which is just like the DnD one, except for D20M instead. I'll also make some for D20M base and advanced classes. <>[[User:EldritchNumen|EldritchNumen]] 01:45, 13 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::It looks good, your getting the hang of it. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 22:57, 13 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Minor formatting ==<br />
<br />
Regarding your recent formatting changes:<br />
#If you haven't already, you might want to fix the relevant (new class) templates.<br />
#You might want to confirm with Sledged about the Balance template. I believe he said it no longer takes multiple fields.<br />
#There's considerable inconsistency among the various templates about what belongs in the "Back to" footer.<br />
#Is there something wrong with including Paragon Classes (or other subcategories) in the "Back to" chain? I find it useful.<br />
--[[User:Cuthalion|Cúthalion]] 09:51, 13 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:The "Back to" footer is kind of up in the air right now since a new version is being proposed on Sledged's user talk page. The reason I got rid of the Paragon Classes in the "Back to" footer was because none of the other classes link to anything farther than DnD Classes. Also, I will looks at the Balance template. Finally, what do you mean by #1? I am a little confused... --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 23:02, 13 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:: #1: I don't think the new class templates are formatted the way you like. --[[User:Cuthalion|Cúthalion]] 13:23, 14 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::I know, I know... I am just too lazy to fix them. Would you like to? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 16:42, 15 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::I'd be happy to. But isn't that a sysop job? How do I do it? --[[User:Cuthalion|Cúthalion]] 20:04, 15 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Page Content Removal ==<br />
<br />
Is that you or Blue Dragon (IP 127.0.0.1) removing the content from the following pages: [[Anti-Paladin (DnD Class)]], [[Armor Construction Guide (DnD Other)]], [[DnD Races]], [[:Category:Skilled]], [[The Tripper (DnD Character Optimization)]]. &mdash;[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 15:30, 13 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:Someone from where I am, but not me. It will not happen again. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 23:02, 13 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
==Request for assistance==<br />
This is Kamin, I'm wondering if you could help me write up stuff like Deities. Although I'm interested in Dungeons and Dragons worlds and the RPG, I have never been able to get the skill set done right. --[[User:Kamin|Kamin]] 17:24, 15 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:What skill set with Deities? I am a little confused. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 17:24, 25 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== i'm on the phone with you right now. ==<br />
<br />
and you are really cute. =)<br />
teehee.'<br />
<br />
- lauren.<br />
<br />
<br />
p.s. <br />
you just said this message was going to be dumb.<br />
well you suck!!<br />
=P<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
i'm going to punch you in the FACE!!!<br />
<br />
<3 {{Unsigned|24.2.109.51|22:26, 15 February 2007 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
== RE: Welcome to D&D Wiki ==<br />
<br />
Hi Green Dragon. Uh, to your questions, I don't know Wiki Format, I can spend about 30 minutes on contributions a day. But I have school so I might not. --[[User:Kamin|Kamin]] 09:55, 16 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:It's fine, just help as much as you can. If you don't know how to help (don't know what needs to be done) I can give you pointers. Do you want me to do that? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 10:27, 16 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::Sure. Pointers would be nice. [[User:Kamin|Kamin]] 16:54, 16 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::Well... If you want to practice your formatting skills add a couple items with [[D&D Wiki:Items to be added]]. That should help you to learn D&D Wiki's formating style better. Also, sorry for taking so long to answer however I have been sick and in Southern Utah recently. Sorry. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 13:49, 21 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Greetings from the Netbook of Feats ==<br />
<br />
Hi there,<br />
<br />
I just wanted to say thanks very much for including the Netbook of Feats in the D&D Wiki. Looks like a great project you have going here and I'm proud to have our work included.<br />
<br />
I'm really impressed with the way you have kept the credits for the feats the way you have. Way beyond what is required by the OGL but very much appreciated.<br />
<br />
If there is anything I can do to help you out with updates or data just let me know.<br />
<br />
Good gaming, <br />
<br />
Sigfried Trent {{Unsigned|206.57.60.147|16:41, 22 February 2007 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
:Hello as well. It is my honor to have the NBoF feats included in D&D Wiki's feats. I have been waiting for this moment to come for quite some time, and I am honestly amazed at how well you are accepting this. I have always known that these feats are okay to have on D&D Wiki with the OGL, however I did not want tensions between the NBoF and D&D Wiki to come about. I really respect the NBoF and I think it does a much better job than D&D Wiki at rating and assessing feats power, playability, and uniqueness. Their are a couple problems with the NBoF feats on D&D Wiki. One of these is that they have not all been added, many of the "Special" or "Different" type feats have not been added to D&D Wiki's feat tables. Another problem is that ''none'' of the new version 12.3 feats have been added. Also, most prerequisites have not been added from the feats page to the corresponding tables. Their is still a lot of work to be done, and I am sorry that it has not been done. However, I have a proposition to make you, and I expect you will not like it. Their are many feats (albeit some that are rather shoddy) that are not part of the NBoF. D&D Wiki would be willing to "give" these to the NBoF so they can become part of the NBoF ''if'' they were to be reviewed, rated, ''and fixed'' by the NBoF while still licensed under the GNU FDL. The problem with these feats is that some have strange prerequisites, are not well made, are confusing, etc and will require a lot of work. So, if you are so willing, D&D Wiki would "give" you these feats if you promise to fix them so they are playable. Does this sound possible? Also, if you just want to help in fully integrating all the feats to D&D Wiki, and not adopting new feats into the NBoF, that is fine. I can help you so you understand how to help D&D Wiki with the NBoF. Would you like to do that and not the adopting, both, none? Whatever is fine just please let me know. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 16:25, 22 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::I hope I am formating this correctly... I will have to take a look at the GNU FDL specifics and see how it works. I try to take care that I use the OGL licence and d20 licence correctly and I have some concerns about mixing them together in our publication. As far as fixing up feats go.. that is pretty much what we do on a regular basis. Asside from the feats that come from the SRD, we work with the original authors of the feats to clean them up and improve them before we publish them. For feats from other d20 sources we tend to make the changes ourselves (since generaly the authors can't be contacted directly). Unfortunately in some ways competing Open Source licenses tend to preclude one another (feats in one could not referecne those in another). I'll give it a look though.<br />
<br />
::Anyhow.. NBOF is free so we are other people using the feats for whatever purpose is pretty much what we hope happens with them. The main goal was to make everyday gamers work accessable and professional enough that it would be used by D&D players around the world. {{Unsigned|206.57.60.147|18:47, 23 February 2007 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
:::You almost formatted it correctly, good job for a second try however. Anyway, please tell me if you think you would be willing to implement these feats into the NBoF with the [[D&D Wiki:Copyrights|GNU FDL]] still in place. Thanks for taking the time to look at this, and I hope it is possible from for the NBoF. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 12:30, 24 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== DnD Wiki Template Question ==<br />
<br />
Hi,<br />
Is the infobox template on Wikipedia is available here?<br />
Thnx<br />
[[User:Pwsnafu|Pwsnafu]] 15:44, 22 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:No, I am sorry it is not. You can add it if you so wish. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 16:26, 22 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== RE: Divine Evoker ==<br />
<br />
dont worry, i just dont have alot of time on a computer. The class is finished now. {{Unsigned|Alabastor|08:21, 23 February 2007 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
:It's fine, as long as you got it done. Thanks for adding it. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 12:25, 24 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== WikiWorld ==<br />
<br />
Is anyone interested in collaborating to work on Wiki World? --[[User:Kamin|Kamin]] 18:04, 24 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:I would contact [[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]]. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 09:53, 25 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Question on Policy ==<br />
<br />
Hey. I just nominated myself for adminship ([[Requests for Adminship/EldritchNumen]]). What is the policy on advertising? I know, above all, that I should not do any myself. Should it be put on the main page in news? I'm curious because I'm afraid that few people will notice it in recent changes and there will be no voting or discussion... I defer whatever decisions are to be made (if any) to you. I just want to make sure that people know I applied so they can discuss the merit of accepting or rejecting me. Thanks! &mdash;[[User:EldritchNumen|EldritchNumen]] 16:33, 25 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:News is the place, I will add it. Thanks for bringing this up before doing it yourself. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 17:23, 25 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Still alive ==<br />
<br />
Alive if you wanted to know. --[[User:Pz.Az.04Maus|Pz.Az.04Maus]] 02:34, 26 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:Thats good. If you want to help out with something let me know, seeing that I have not seen you make edits in a while. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 09:31, 26 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Proposed Color Scheme Page ==<br />
<br />
Hey. I made the page for the [[Proposed Color Scheme]]. All that needs to be done is a link to this page (Proposed Color Scheme) needs to be added to the News on the main page. The caption could be "DnD Wiki is undergoing a search for a new color scheme. Vote [[Proposed Color Scheme|here]] and tell us what you think!". Feel free to change the proposed color page as it seems best to you. &mdash;[[User:EldritchNumen|EldritchNumen]] 01:06, 1 March 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Wikify? ==<br />
<br />
Well, I haven't been on here in a while, and I was looking through the site today, and saw that both articles I've posted need to be 'Wikified'. Problem is, I really don't have a clue what that means. Could you possibly explain so I can fix that problem? [[User:Maverick Wolf|Maverick Wolf]] 10:04, 1 March 2007 (EST)</div>Maverick Wolfhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Green_Dragon&diff=82694User talk:Green Dragon2007-03-01T15:02:30Z<p>Maverick Wolf: Wikify?</p>
<hr />
<div>{{Messages of Interest|messages=<br />
{{MoI-Row<br />
|page=User talk:Sledged<br />
|section= NPCs Based on the Admins of The D&D Wiki<br />
|notifier=Sledged<br />
|date_time=14:56, 23 December 2006 (MST)<br />
}}<br />
{{MoI-Row<br />
|page=Darkfire Guild Wizard (DnD Prestige Class)<br />
|section=adding it too homebrew with descriptions.<br />
|notifier=Calidore Chase<br />
|date_time=15:04, 10 January 2007<br />
}}<br />
{{MoI-Row<br />
|page=Talk:Improved Natural Attack (SRD Feat)<br />
|section=Charting the changes?<br />
|notifier=Calidore Chase<br />
|date_time=10:27, 19 January 2007<br />
}}<br />
{{MoI-Row<br />
|page=Talk:Plating Canister (DnD Equipment)<br />
|section=Understanding<br />
|notifier=Cypresslyshra<br />
|date_time= 18:44 22.1.07<br />
}}<br />
{{MoI-Row<br />
|page=User talk:Sledged<br />
|section=New Materials<br />
|notifier=Sledged<br />
|date_time=[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] 13:16, 26 January 2007 (MST)<br />
}}<br />
{{MoI-Row<br />
|page=Talk:Alcoholic (DnD Flaw)<br />
|section=<br />
|notifier=Cypresslyshra<br />
|date_time= 20:57, 31 January 2007 (MST)<br />
}}<br />
{{MoI-Row<br />
|page=Talk:Brawler (DnD Class)<br />
|section=Fix 'Create New Base Class' template<br />
|notifier=Sledged<br />
|date_time=10:51, 10 February 2007 (MST)<br />
}}<br />
{{MoI-Row<br />
|page=SRD Talk:Trap Sense (Epic Feat)<br />
|notifier=Sledged<br />
|date_time=12:05, 27 February 2007 (MST)<br />
}}<br />
{{MoI-Row<br />
|page=Talk:Main Page<br />
|section=Proposed Color Scheme #3.1<br />
|notifier=EldritchNumen<br />
|date_time=15:16, 28 February 2007 (MST)<br />
}}<br />
<br />
}}<br />
<br />
{{Archives<br />
|label1= Archive 1 (Discussions 1 &ndash; 30)<br />
|label2= Archive 2 (Discussions 31 &ndash; 60)<br />
|label3= Archive 3 (Discussions 61 &ndash; 90)<br />
}}<br />
<br />
== New Message of Interest Template ==<br />
<br />
What do you think of the new template? If you remove the nested Template:MoI-Row the table gets hidden like so:<br />
{{Messages of Interest|messages=<br />
<br />
}}<br />
So it only shows up if there are messages. &mdash;[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] 11:29, 15 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
:It is amazing. Great idea, and I have already implemented it at a couple of locations. Thanks for this idea. Also, please see [[Template talk:Messages of Interest#How to use]] for something I said about it... Anyway, great idea, much better than the current system. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 02:25, 16 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Wikimedia Donations ==<br />
<br />
I see Wikimedia is doing their year end donation drive. How would you feel in regards to something on the front page directing users to their donation site? --[[User:Xenophon|Xenophon]] 06:33, 18 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
:Hm... I don't really know... I'm not affiliated/related to the site, etc. I don't really see why I should... Maybe D&D Wiki's own [[D&D Wiki:Site support|fundrasing campaign]] (jk - Also that is the page that Blue Dragon has edited the most (I think he wants a free server from Donations that would help Tundra (the current server) running D&D Wiki ''':)''' ))... What would you recommend? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 16:07, 18 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
::I understand that we are a smaller user base and definitely don't have the pool of resources to draw from that Wikimedia does. It does seem reasonable that if anyone has just a bit of money to donate they should allocate that money to the more needy source. Wikimedia provides the core of this site. Any way you look at it we all owe something back. I'm not saying we should all pour money into or else we're stealing. That's the beauty of the GPL is that anyone, even those lacking ANY funds, can use it. It might just be my opinion, but I feel that by virtue of you using MediaWiki associates you in a way with Wikimedia. In writing this another thought came to mind in regards to having our own drive locally. We can solicit donations, pay for some server costs and then pass up something as D&D Wiki to Wikimedia. I feel that contributing as a group speaks more about us than if the same amount was contributed individually. MediaWiki is what the web was meant to be. It gives the voice to the people, creating a cable public access station as if it had the resources of the entire world. I apologize for the length of this. This is really a culmination of my thoughts, finally consolidated. I really am much more cynical than I seem idealist. I find this whole thing fascinating and exciting but at the same time I worry for its future, not just monetarily. Yes, I am being an evangelist but it is for something once in my life I totally understand and feel some real passion about... Besides D&D. --[[User:Xenophon|Xenophon]] 15:42, 19 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::I agree with you. I like the idea of having out own drive, then donating half to MediaWiki. Thanks for the idea, and I will get Blue Dragon to work on it soon. Thanks so much for this idea, and possibly Blue Dragon can get another server for this site, and this site can say "Thank you" to MediaWiki... --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 15:47, 19 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::We did not get the donation drive out in time for help with the wikimedia drive, but still, if we more than enough to buy more RAM we will give the rest to wikimedia. So, [[HardwarePurchase1|donate]] if you would like (I know you may have been put off my [[Talk:Main Page]], but please don't listen to that; Blue Dragon just got carried away... Please forgive and forget, don't let Blue Dragon give you problems...) --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 10:54, 29 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Feedback + FR Wiki ==<br />
<br />
I recently came across this wiki by accident but I wanted to say it is excellent, if underpopulated, and I think its relative lack of promotion or awareness is to blame. I am an editor at [http://forgottenrealms.wikia.com Forgotten Realms wiki] and although our wikis do not necessarily cross paths (FR-wiki is a glorified reference to FR source material), there are opportunities to interact, so I thought I would link to D&D Wiki articles where they exist, instead of other places, and even contribute here where necessary. [[User:Fw190a8|Fw190a8]] 19:58, 18 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
:A couple things. First off, my wiki is not underpopulated (compare [http://www.dandwiki.com/wiki/Special:Statistics this] to [http://forgottenrealms.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Statistics this])... Anyway, not trying to get off to a bad start (I have just had a problem with a different "merger" a while back). So, what exactly are you proposing? So we understand each others wikis better, I have started with a comparison. First off, I like that your<small>(?)</small> Wiki has been around for a while, I will say quite a bit longer than mine (Yours founded on 11 October 2005, mine on February 4th 2006). Also, the edits to your wiki are still coming, even though it is not very popular (only 3,657 page views since October 11 2005, whereas mine has 616,691 page views since February 4th 2006). Also, you have quite the user-base, whereas since D&D Wiki is so new it is lacking that (D&D Wiki has under 200 users, you have a very large amount (e.g. Green Dragon is already taken)). I would say our wikis are about the same (not content wise, but statistically speaking...). So, again, what exactly would you like to happen? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 23:49, 18 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
:: ''':)''' We may have a small user-base, but we are proud, noble, dedicated folk... ''':)''' --[[User:EldritchNumen|EldritchNumen]] 04:05, 19 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::Agreed. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 14:55, 19 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
== New Archives Template ==<br />
<br />
What do you think of the new [[Template:Archives|archives template]] using the [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:LoopFunctions loop functions extension] [[User:Blue Dragon|Blue Dragon]] installed? There's a demo of it in my [[User talk:Sledged|talk page]].<br />
<br />
The first paramter ''n'' specifies how many archive pages there are. The rest of the parameters (''label1'', ''label2'', ''label3'', etc...) specify the link text. &mdash;[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] 13:40, 19 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
:I think I might be getting carried away... &mdash;[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] 13:41, 19 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
::I like it... Would you mind implementing it where archives are? I am asking you because I have yet to take the time to fully understand it... --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 14:52, 19 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
== New SRD Landing Page is Up==<br />
<br />
I plopped the new SRD landing page in this morning. Thanks a zillion. The new page looks great. --[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 07:46, 20 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
:Agreed, it is much better than the old SRD page. Good job, and thanks for doing that. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 15:40, 20 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
==RE:Welcome to D&D Wiki==<br />
<br />
'''Green Dragon wrote:'''<br />
<br />
''Hello LoneLobo, and welcome to D&D Wiki! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like D&D Wiki and decide to stay. I am the owner of the site, and if you have a question feel free to ask me, however when contacting anyone on D&D Wiki through talk pages please sign your name using four tildes ([[User:LoneLobo|LoneLobo]] 00:29, 21 December 2006 (MST)); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Also, if you want to help D&D Wiki but just don't know how drop me a note and I'll see what I can do. However, when dropping me a note please tell me how much time you would like to spend working, how well you know the Wiki Format, and how well you know D&D. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a D&D Wikian! If you need help ask me on my talk page, or just right here. Again, welcome! --Green Dragon 23:31, 20 December 2006 (MST)''<br />
<br />
:Green Dragon, Thank you for your warm welcome. The D&D Wiki is a great resource, you should definintely be proud of the accomplishment. I only found the site yesterday, and I still haven't been able to look through most of the great content. I know the Wiki format fairly well, but on other Wikis, I've never created articles from scratch, though I have editted many. D&D has been my passion for nearly ten years, and in the past few years I've mostly DM'd campaigns, with the exception of RPGA events, although I have been working on becoming GM certified with the RPGA. I hope I'll be able to contribute positively to the D&D Wiki, though it seems a lot of information has already been covered. I'm really interested in your Wikiworld Campaign Setting project, and as soon as I finish reading all of the source material, I think I've got a pretty decent idea to help the project along; though I'd like to get an idea for how many people are already actively using the project's campaign setting in games they're running. Again, thank you for your welcome. [[User:LoneLobo|LoneLobo]] 00:29, 21 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
::No problem, my pleasure. Anyway, your contributions to the wikiworld have been very good so far. I dont think you are changing the idea of it, it only looks better than before. About the "Uses": I am sure quite a bit of people are using it, however no one has said such a thing. People never say if they use things from this site, but I know people are because D&D Wiki just keeps gettimg more and more visitors.... Glad you like the site so much and Merry Christmas. I look forward to your contributions. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 08:39, 21 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Thanks for the Help ==<br />
<br />
Well it's almost Christmas again and social matters tend to take control for a few days and I just wanted to say '''Thank you for the warm welcome and the help!'''<br />
DandDwiki is definitely the greatest source for game material I have found and I already know I'll use a lot of it in the coming year.<br />
So the only thing that's left is to say: '''Merry Christmas and a happy new year!, Keep up the good work!''' --[[User:Ymir|Ymir]] 01:28, 21 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
:Merry Christmas to you as well, and I wish you a happy new year. Thanks for putting up all you things so far, and updating the feats. Your CS is beginging to look very good. '''Merry Christmas''' as well. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 08:39, 21 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Help Please! ==<br />
<br />
I noticed how the NPC page got changed around and got reorganized. Nice job on it. I was planning on contributing some new NPC's tonight but I am having trouble editing in order to put in new entries. Little help please? --[[User:rowsdower44|rowsdower44]] 18:18, 23 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
:Adding NPC's is '''easier''' than before. Go to [[Add a New DnD NPC]] and follow the discussion. The new CR's are all dynamic (using DPL's) so just make sure your new NPC is part of [[:Category:DnD]], [[:Category:User]], [[:Category:NPC]], and Category:CR----your CR here---. This will make your NPC show on the correct CR page ''when you have saved your NPC''. I hope you like this method, and I am glad it looks better. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 17:35, 23 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Google Custom Search ==<br />
<br />
I don't know if this problem is exclusive to me, but I now have a little bar under my Navigation box that says "Google Custom Search", which would not be a problem, save for the fact that the 'Search' button extends into whatever text I am reading. Along the same lines, the search and Toolbox sections have been shunted to the bottom, and shrunk down to 5pt font. Am I simply the owner of a F***ed up machine? {{Unsigned|Cypresslyshra|17:21, 23 December 2006 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
:Not at all... [[User:Blue Dragon|Blue Dragon]] wanted to add Google search to D&D Wiki, then stopped adding it for the day telling me "It wont show up on anyones computer!" So, I believed him, seeing that it never showed up on my PC. Now, however, it appears that it ''has'' shown up on other computers... Thanks for bringing this up to me and I will tell Blue Dragon about this problem later (I cannot contact him for a bit). Sorry for this problem, and it will be fixed later. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 17:40, 23 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
::Don't worry yourself too much with it, it's just a touch of a nusance more than a crippling error.--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 17:48, 23 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::That makes me feel better... I thought this was a major problem, one that made it so it was very hard to see what is happening on a certain page. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 17:50, 23 December 2006 (MST)<br />
<br />
== MSRD ==<br />
<br />
Yes, I am posting the MSRD. It's my "wife's away" project. This time, I get to apply all my lessons learned from the SRD. My plan is to post the basic conversions then let others organize it from there. Whether someone else actually picks that up may or may not happens. (I keep telling myself that I will stop fiddling with it. Yeah, right. But it will be secondary unless the MSRD keeps impressing me. Dang they did a good design job on that game.) <br />
<br />
Merry new year. --[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 04:35, 1 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:Thanks, Merry New Year to you as well, even though it is a little late. Anyway, I have to agree D20M is like the better version of D&D, all the problems are worked out (makes one wonder what 4e will be like...). Also, the MSRD is looking very good, and it shows that you have already done this ''':)'''. Anyway, I hope you finish this before your wife gets back and makes you quit adding the MSRD (quit? Well...). It's looking good. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 23:12, 2 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::The wife is VERY supportive of my wiki work. Having done all that organizing and work on the SRD, putting this thing in was a breeze. It's also far smaller than the SRD. The merging of materials is going quite quickly. I also have ideas for possible improvements. I should be able to mine Wikipedia for images of modern equipment. --[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 09:29, 10 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::I like the images that you have added so far, they are relevant and good. Also, thanks so much for adding the MSRD, it was needed for quite some tim. Also, another barnstar is coming your way when your done ''':)'''. Thanks. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 14:45, 10 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== the poladar dude ==<br />
<br />
hey thanks a bunch for ur help i could really use it because i really want to make a cool race people can use in D &D but i know almost nothing about D & D so i just want to no if there are turns in D & D cause if their are then my rush ability will work great Rush: ability for any poladar to travel 30 feet instead of 22 for 3 turns (can use twice a day) {{Unsigned|66.214.70.113|00:06, 3 January 2007 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
:First off, please post this on the [[Poladar (DnD Race)|Poladar]] discussion ([[Talk:Poladar (DnD Race)|here]]), then we can look at it and evaluate it. Thanks for your understanding, but user-pages are not the place to post information that is intended only for a certain race. Also, FYI, you should get a user-account as then the creations will be under your name forever and I can post messages on your user-talk alerting you of changes that may interest you. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 23:10, 2 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== SVG Files ==<br />
<br />
Is it possible to upload SVG files, and have wiki automatically convert it on the fly to png? If so how do I do this, when I tried to upload an SVG it said it was not a recommended format, I did not see a way to force it to go. I noticed in the uploaded files area you have a couple that are .svg.png.<br />
<br />
Anyway, thanks for the greet, I will try to contribute a little bit when I can. --[[User:StarStrike|StarStrike]] 23:22, 2 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:You cannot have it automatically change it to a .png. Just override the message and upload it anyway, making sure to convert the file to .png beforehand. I hope this is not to much of an inconvenience, and if it is that much of an inconvenience I can have [[user:Blue Dragon]] program an extension that does what you are asking for. Would you like an extension added that does this, or would you prefer to just change the file format outside of D&D Wiki? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 23:45, 2 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::That is fine, I can convert it beforehand, I thought it might of been a bit easier for other users to edit an SVG as opposed to a PNG or other similar format. --[[User:StarStrike|StarStrike]] 07:12, 3 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::Even though that may be true, it is very hard to get around some of the limitations to MediaWiki. Sorry that it is not possible to convert files on the site. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 14:35, 3 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Wikifiying old spells ==<br />
<br />
I still have in my possession an old ADnD spell book, which I occasionally look at for reference. It would be plagurism to post them as my own, but some of them are really good wizard spells. Where would they go? --[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 17:51, 3 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:Sadly, you cannot post them on D&D Wiki, as they are not released under the OGL (Open Gaming License). For something to be allowed to be distributed that was made by a company it has be released under the OGL. The only reason the SRD is allowed to be here is because the SRD is released under the OGL. Old spells are not allowed just like classes from WotC 3.5e books are not allowed. Sorry, but laws are laws and I don't want D&D Wiki violating copyright problems. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 18:20, 3 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::Quite alright, that's why I asked first.--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 18:24, 3 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::BTW, thanks for asking first... It's bad when a user (this has happened before) just posts copyrighted material... Thanks for asking. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 18:26, 3 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::<nowiki>*</nowiki>Whistles innocently* --[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 18:30, 3 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::::Was that really you? I could not place my finger on who did it before, I just remember it happened.... Oh well, no worries. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 18:31, 3 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::::Just the Grue was mine. And I think I asked for that one to be removed.--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 18:33, 3 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::::::Oh, so the class that was posted on D&D Wiki from the PHB II was not you... I know about the Grue, but that was not really that bad. Spending the time to directly copy a class from the PHB II, then having it deleted right after it is posted on D&D Wiki is bad. I felt bad for the IP that did that, but copyrights are copyrights... The Grue was not bad. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 18:37, 3 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::You post an article about how to convert old spells. My question is could you get away with posting only the parts of the spell have to be changed to fit d20, like an update booklet. It wouldn't be the whole spell, so a reader would still have to have the reference source on hand for it to be usable. &mdash;[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] 10:25, 4 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
==The Illandians==<br />
I have a tribe of humans, who played a great role in previous campaigns. I was wondering if there was a place to put information on the tribe and their village? {{Unsigned|Cypresslyshra|22:08, 4 January 2007 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
:The best place would be [[DnD Campaign Settings]], if you modify it a bit. You would have to more describe their location, and not just the tribe, to make it fit as a Campaign Setting. However, this would be the best place. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 22:24, 4 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::I shall do that then. --[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 22:25, 4 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::Good. I look forward to seeing these "Illandians"... --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 22:29, 4 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::Done. [[The Illandian Desert (DnD Campaign Setting)]]--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 11:10, 5 January 2007 (MST)<br />
::::Amendum: I just found the information on specific tribemen, I'll be adding those shortly<br />
<br />
:::::Okay. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 15:59, 5 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
==SRD Spells==<br />
I was dregging through the spell section, and found it was less than useful if you were looking spells for a specific level.<br />
<br />
I would be willing to orgainize the spells into level catagories, if I could find out how to do so.--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 12:51, 5 January 2007 (MST)<br />
Amdendum: Scratch that, just found the Class-level list. Delete this message.<br />
<br />
:Glad you found it. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 14:47, 5 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::Spells by level is a true categorization nightmare, especially as they shift about levels by class.--[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 09:15, 10 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::Agreed, that is why I am not sure of a good way to categorize spells with dlpc's and have them work with the SRD's categories. Spells are a very hard dilemma. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 14:48, 10 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::Well, this may be the stupidest thing I ever offer to do, but if you guys want, I could give you a hand with organizing them. I know we already have class-level-spell lists, but perhaps we should just place those at the top, so that people can find them easily?--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 22:27, 10 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::::Go for it. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 21:13, 20 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::::Problem. Finally got around to it, but found that the page that I'm attempting to add the links to the Class Spell lists was protected by the OGL. Curiouser and curiouserer--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 21:08, 29 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::::::I am a little confused, could you please re-explain it? What page are you trying to add spells to again? If the page is SRD no DnD spells should be added. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 21:56, 29 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::::::The question I originally had was if I could place the links to Class Spells at the begining of the SRD spell page, so that there would be links to Bard, Ranger, Druid, Wizard, and Cleric spell list at the top. We already have the lists, but they're all mixed in.--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 22:01, 29 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::::::::Thats not possible because of the OGL and how the SRD works. Sorry. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 22:06, 29 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::::::::Ok, as long as that's clear. I was wondering.--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 22:12, 29 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::::::::::No problem... I wish their was not such a large gap between the SRD and the DnD material as well. Oh well, nothing I can do about it. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 22:14, 29 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Ghost monk ==<br />
I'm probably bringing this to the wrong person, but I was wondering if you could possibly give me a hand.<br />
<br />
I entered in an old prestige class, the ghost monk, from old documentation. I'm fairly certain I got them right, but I'm worried that some of the things that make the class workable in the past make it overpowered now. --[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 22:43, 10 January 2007 (MST)<br />
Amendum: If this is in the wrong place, feel free to delete it from your talk page.<br />
<br />
:What are you asking exactly...? I am a little confused... --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 22:53, 10 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::I was asking if you would rate the balance, but right now it seems I need some caffine. My mind is fuzzing out.--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 22:57, 10 January 2007 (MST)<br />
::Amendum: Sorry bout the confusion, I wasn't entirely cognizant.<br />
<br />
:::Can do. I will also ask a couple other people to rate it as well so the rating is more correct. This is no problem. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 23:08, 10 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::: I'm just not usually entirely happy with asking people to do work, but thank you Sooo much.--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 23:11, 10 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::::No problem, I don't mind helping people on D&D Wiki at all. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 23:22, 10 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== copyright ==<br />
<br />
hello, I'm back again and just read your message about the pictures in my CS, and indeed most where from the art galleries from WotC, so to make sure you and DanDwiki are not getting into trouble I immediately removed all images (except the cosmology, I made that in paint myself) sorry if I caused any inconvenience. [[User:Ymir|Ymir]] 02:18, 11 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:Shouldn't be much of a problem now that you deleted certain ones. Thanks for taking the initiative. Also, was the one with a buffalo a copyright violation? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 20:24, 11 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::no it was a private picture made by a relative, but in the interest of not putting this site in problems I still removed it, I'm working on a few private pictures to describe the planes in my cosmology. --[[User:Ymir|Ymir]] 02:39, 15 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::Okay. I deleted all the pictures, however if you want a non-copyright one to be on just tell me and I will un-delete it. Thanks. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 09:13, 15 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== (another) Question ==<br />
<br />
Hello i'm just getting back into my campaign setting and was wondering something...<br />
Some of my deity's from [[The Test of Time (DnD Campaign Setting)]] have been inserted into the general DnD Deity's and I was wondering how to do that, since the layout turns out ok and more people can use my creations.<br />
Now I tried a few times but it always comes up different then when someone else did it and I would like to keep 1 format for my campaign.<br />
any help is welcomed!<br />
<br />
{{Unsigned|Ymir|09:35, 16 January 2007 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
:Just add the appropriate category (DnD, User, Deity) and it will show up. Its all in the categories. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 15:40, 16 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== dlpc or Balance Template ==<br />
<br />
I was just looking at the Homebrew Prestige Class with Description page and noticed that the table was much larger and seemed to simply not to be reading the classes correctly. So, I went and tried to see what I could do to fix it (if anything) - I think that the table is having a problem reading the names from the [Balance Template|Template:PrC Balance], as the names that are outside the table had all had that template applied to them as opposed to the dlpc template. I don't know for sure, but I could understand if it would work if we got all of them to use it, so I thought I'd check and see which is supposed to be used. [[User:Passer|Passer]] 04:06, 20 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:Honestly, the DLPC does ''not'' work via templates. Soon all the PrC's will be converted back to the DPLC's, and the Balance Template will not include the DLPC. For right now make your PrC using both, it might work... --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 21:12, 20 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
==(Character) Flaws==<br />
<br />
Since I'm not sure if it's technically part of the rules anymore, if I wanted to include charater flaws(Agrophobia, Hypocondria), where would I put them?--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 18:26, 23 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:[[DnD Other]] I would say, unless they are specific to a certain section than put them under that section. However, for common fears (Agrophobia, Hypocondria, etc) [[DnD Other]] is the place. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 22:07, 23 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::Okay, I'll do that--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 22:23, 23 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::Watch out though, if its a feat it really should go under [[DnD Feats]] (looking at [[Talk:Plating Canister (DnD Equipment)]]), etc. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 22:26, 23 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::That's the thing. It's sort of an Anti-feat, like adding negitive one to the equation. Not certain how well it would fit into the Feats section.--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 22:30, 23 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::::I would say make a new section called "Anti-Feats" or "Negative Feats" and add your feats to that new section you would have just created. Does this sound like it would work, or would it confuse people...? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 22:39, 23 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::::I'd include a little primer at the begining of the page, to aleviate the confusion? I'd be happy to do the work on filling it in it, if we started that up. I'd have to make a note, they don't all give you feats. The OCD flaw, for example, allows the character to automatically pass all spot checks, but they need to make a will save (DC 18) every turn that they don't examine the enviroment, taking a -2 on all rolls if they fail.--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 22:47, 23 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::::::Okay, here is what you need to do to fit this into D&D Wiki perfectly. Make it a variant rule. And, on the variant rule page briefly explain what this is than give a link to all the things on D&D Wiki that follow this variant rule. On all the pages that follow this variant rule give them a little disclaimer saying something like "This is related to ______________ variant rule, and will work with normal D&D Rules easily, see _______________ for how to implement this into your campaign." Next add all the feats to the list on your variant rule page ''and'' on [[DnD Feats]] in a good spot (Possibly your own little section, general, or variant, etc). This should work. If I did not makse sense basically just make the item, link it like normal and add a little disclamer linking to your variant rule which would also have a list of all the items that work with this variant. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 22:57, 23 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::::::I shall do that then. Now to go finish the Forgotten Panthion...(Kekeke)--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 23:00, 23 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::::::::*Phew* so it made sense... --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 23:07, 23 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::::::::[[Character Flaws (DnD Variant Rule)]] Thar it be. I'm leaning towards a section dedicated just to flaws, to see if anyone else has some good ones. Besides, I think I have enough for a section.--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 15:57, 24 January 2007 (MST)<br />
:::::::::::Amendum: I just realized I pretty much posted that entire section straight from Documentation, so I'm not sure how up to date it is. I declare Meh.--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 21:28, 24 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::::::::::I would just say update it as you go along, make sure it is all 3.5e material when done... --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 23:11, 24 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::::::::::::I've been half-way watching this discussion (I haven't read every part of it), but if you're using the character flaws variant from [http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=products/dndacc/881560000 Unearthed Arcana], it should be noted that that book contains a lot of OGC. I think it might be a good idea if someone were transcribe the OGC rules from it. I've been thinking about putting it on my TODO list, but I have no idea when I might get my hands on a copy or have to the time to completely port it. &mdash;[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 10:47, 2 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::::::::::::No, this isn't the flaw system from unearthed Arcana. This is a system that my own DM invented, sort of as a trade off system. He wanted to use it because he had descided that characters were getting too perfect.--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 20:45, 2 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::::::::::::::Tuning in late ... It looks to me like your DM independently invented a system much like the UA system, although his is a bit more elaborate (e.g. severity levels, prerequisites). My recommendation:<br />
::::::::::::::::*Include UA and homebrew together in one place, making sure UA flaws are licensed as OGL.<br />
::::::::::::::::*Move flaws to their own section, parallel with feats, skills, etc.<br />
::::::::::::::::*Start a new conversation thread so I don't wear out my : key. ;)<br />
:::::::::::::::--[[User:Cuthalion|Cúthalion]] 10:00, 13 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::Having never read the UA flaws, I wouldn't know how to intigrate them in, but if someone wants to add the UA flaws, they would need to make their own section, since I assume they operate under a different ruleset than [[Character Flaws (DnD Variant Rule)]]--[[User:Cypresslyshra|Cypresslyshra]] 11:40, 13 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::I'm pretty sure [http://www.d20srd.org/srd/variant/buildingCharacters/characterFlaws.htm UA] uses a subset of the rules you use. I'd be happy to confirm and make the changes if you like (and if no one else objects). --[[User:Cuthalion|Cúthalion]] 11:46, 13 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::If they use the same rules I think it would be very nice to integrate them together. Do they use the same rules? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 22:59, 13 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== skills ==<br />
<br />
This is just a general question I need an answer to. Do you have to be trained by someone in skills that do not allow you to use them untrained? Like say I'm a paladin and want to learn knowledge (religion) which is a skill I cannot use without at least a rank of 1. Could I just invest skill points into this or do I have to have someone with knowledge in religion teach me or say read from a book? {{Unsigned|65.164.48.63|11:44, 28 January 2007 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
:A brief overview: there are two kinds of skills, Class Skills and non-class Skills. Every level a character gets a certain amount of skill ranks equal to their classes "Skills/Level" + their Int bonus. So, if they get 2 skills per level from their class, and have an int bonus of +3 they get 5 ranks. These ranks can be put in ''either'' their class skills or non-class skills. When a character puts a rank in a class skills they get a 1:1 ratio, one ranks in the skill gives them an additional +1. However, if they put a rank in a non-class skill they get a 1:2 ration, it takes 2 ranks go give a +1 in a certain skill. So, you can use any skill you like even if it is not a class skill they are just harder to get better at. Does this answer you question? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 13:02, 28 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::I understand that. What I meant was on the character sheets, the skills that have a black square next to them can be used untrained meaning that they can be used automatically without any ranks. What I'm asking is if the skills that don't have squares next to them can have rank added to them after you gain a level, or do you need to have someone teach you these skills so that you can invest points? In other words does someone have to train you to use the trained only skills? {{Unsigned|65.164.48.132|20:09, 28 January 2007 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
:::For the most part, that's the DM's call. There's nothing in the rules that says you have to have a tutor to put ranks in any skill. So unless your DM says otherwise, you can put ranks into any skill in which you haven't already invested skill points. &mdash;[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] 19:16, 28 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::Hm... I play that one ''cannot'' use those skills. Just my version... --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 19:22, 28 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::::The majority implementation of this is that when you gain a level, you can put ranks into anything by following the skill rules. DM's may alter mechanism this to fit their campaign. --[[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]] 08:05, 10 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
==Anti-Vandal IP to be blocked...==<br />
<br />
66.56.255.79 has been vandalizing. A block is in order... --[[User:EldritchNumen|EldritchNumen]] 03:21, 10 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:Done, thanks for telling me about that. The IP is blocked for 2 weeks. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 11:52, 10 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== D20 PrC with descriptions==<br />
<br />
So, I tried updating [[User D20M Prestige Classes with Descriptions]], but the format of the template automatically converts the link to the page as (DnD Prestige Class) rather than (D20 Modern Prestige Class). We need to make a new dpl thingy header that doesn't do that. I don't know who to contact... so you seemed like a good bet! :) Sorry for my lack of knowledge in this code... <>[[User:EldritchNumen|EldritchNumen]] 01:32, 13 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:NM! I figured out how to do it myself. I created a new dplc template called D20M_PrC_Description, which is just like the DnD one, except for D20M instead. I'll also make some for D20M base and advanced classes. <>[[User:EldritchNumen|EldritchNumen]] 01:45, 13 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::It looks good, your getting the hang of it. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 22:57, 13 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Minor formatting ==<br />
<br />
Regarding your recent formatting changes:<br />
#If you haven't already, you might want to fix the relevant (new class) templates.<br />
#You might want to confirm with Sledged about the Balance template. I believe he said it no longer takes multiple fields.<br />
#There's considerable inconsistency among the various templates about what belongs in the "Back to" footer.<br />
#Is there something wrong with including Paragon Classes (or other subcategories) in the "Back to" chain? I find it useful.<br />
--[[User:Cuthalion|Cúthalion]] 09:51, 13 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:The "Back to" footer is kind of up in the air right now since a new version is being proposed on Sledged's user talk page. The reason I got rid of the Paragon Classes in the "Back to" footer was because none of the other classes link to anything farther than DnD Classes. Also, I will looks at the Balance template. Finally, what do you mean by #1? I am a little confused... --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 23:02, 13 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:: #1: I don't think the new class templates are formatted the way you like. --[[User:Cuthalion|Cúthalion]] 13:23, 14 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::I know, I know... I am just too lazy to fix them. Would you like to? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 16:42, 15 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::I'd be happy to. But isn't that a sysop job? How do I do it? --[[User:Cuthalion|Cúthalion]] 20:04, 15 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Page Content Removal ==<br />
<br />
Is that you or Blue Dragon (IP 127.0.0.1) removing the content from the following pages: [[Anti-Paladin (DnD Class)]], [[Armor Construction Guide (DnD Other)]], [[DnD Races]], [[:Category:Skilled]], [[The Tripper (DnD Character Optimization)]]. &mdash;[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 15:30, 13 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:Someone from where I am, but not me. It will not happen again. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 23:02, 13 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
==Request for assistance==<br />
This is Kamin, I'm wondering if you could help me write up stuff like Deities. Although I'm interested in Dungeons and Dragons worlds and the RPG, I have never been able to get the skill set done right. --[[User:Kamin|Kamin]] 17:24, 15 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:What skill set with Deities? I am a little confused. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 17:24, 25 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== i'm on the phone with you right now. ==<br />
<br />
and you are really cute. =)<br />
teehee.'<br />
<br />
- lauren.<br />
<br />
<br />
p.s. <br />
you just said this message was going to be dumb.<br />
well you suck!!<br />
=P<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
i'm going to punch you in the FACE!!!<br />
<br />
<3 {{Unsigned|24.2.109.51|22:26, 15 February 2007 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
== RE: Welcome to D&D Wiki ==<br />
<br />
Hi Green Dragon. Uh, to your questions, I don't know Wiki Format, I can spend about 30 minutes on contributions a day. But I have school so I might not. --[[User:Kamin|Kamin]] 09:55, 16 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:It's fine, just help as much as you can. If you don't know how to help (don't know what needs to be done) I can give you pointers. Do you want me to do that? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 10:27, 16 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::Sure. Pointers would be nice. [[User:Kamin|Kamin]] 16:54, 16 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::Well... If you want to practice your formatting skills add a couple items with [[D&D Wiki:Items to be added]]. That should help you to learn D&D Wiki's formating style better. Also, sorry for taking so long to answer however I have been sick and in Southern Utah recently. Sorry. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 13:49, 21 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Greetings from the Netbook of Feats ==<br />
<br />
Hi there,<br />
<br />
I just wanted to say thanks very much for including the Netbook of Feats in the D&D Wiki. Looks like a great project you have going here and I'm proud to have our work included.<br />
<br />
I'm really impressed with the way you have kept the credits for the feats the way you have. Way beyond what is required by the OGL but very much appreciated.<br />
<br />
If there is anything I can do to help you out with updates or data just let me know.<br />
<br />
Good gaming, <br />
<br />
Sigfried Trent {{Unsigned|206.57.60.147|16:41, 22 February 2007 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
:Hello as well. It is my honor to have the NBoF feats included in D&D Wiki's feats. I have been waiting for this moment to come for quite some time, and I am honestly amazed at how well you are accepting this. I have always known that these feats are okay to have on D&D Wiki with the OGL, however I did not want tensions between the NBoF and D&D Wiki to come about. I really respect the NBoF and I think it does a much better job than D&D Wiki at rating and assessing feats power, playability, and uniqueness. Their are a couple problems with the NBoF feats on D&D Wiki. One of these is that they have not all been added, many of the "Special" or "Different" type feats have not been added to D&D Wiki's feat tables. Another problem is that ''none'' of the new version 12.3 feats have been added. Also, most prerequisites have not been added from the feats page to the corresponding tables. Their is still a lot of work to be done, and I am sorry that it has not been done. However, I have a proposition to make you, and I expect you will not like it. Their are many feats (albeit some that are rather shoddy) that are not part of the NBoF. D&D Wiki would be willing to "give" these to the NBoF so they can become part of the NBoF ''if'' they were to be reviewed, rated, ''and fixed'' by the NBoF while still licensed under the GNU FDL. The problem with these feats is that some have strange prerequisites, are not well made, are confusing, etc and will require a lot of work. So, if you are so willing, D&D Wiki would "give" you these feats if you promise to fix them so they are playable. Does this sound possible? Also, if you just want to help in fully integrating all the feats to D&D Wiki, and not adopting new feats into the NBoF, that is fine. I can help you so you understand how to help D&D Wiki with the NBoF. Would you like to do that and not the adopting, both, none? Whatever is fine just please let me know. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 16:25, 22 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::I hope I am formating this correctly... I will have to take a look at the GNU FDL specifics and see how it works. I try to take care that I use the OGL licence and d20 licence correctly and I have some concerns about mixing them together in our publication. As far as fixing up feats go.. that is pretty much what we do on a regular basis. Asside from the feats that come from the SRD, we work with the original authors of the feats to clean them up and improve them before we publish them. For feats from other d20 sources we tend to make the changes ourselves (since generaly the authors can't be contacted directly). Unfortunately in some ways competing Open Source licenses tend to preclude one another (feats in one could not referecne those in another). I'll give it a look though.<br />
<br />
::Anyhow.. NBOF is free so we are other people using the feats for whatever purpose is pretty much what we hope happens with them. The main goal was to make everyday gamers work accessable and professional enough that it would be used by D&D players around the world. {{Unsigned|206.57.60.147|18:47, 23 February 2007 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
:::You almost formatted it correctly, good job for a second try however. Anyway, please tell me if you think you would be willing to implement these feats into the NBoF with the [[D&D Wiki:Copyrights|GNU FDL]] still in place. Thanks for taking the time to look at this, and I hope it is possible from for the NBoF. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 12:30, 24 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== DnD Wiki Template Question ==<br />
<br />
Hi,<br />
Is the infobox template on Wikipedia is available here?<br />
Thnx<br />
[[User:Pwsnafu|Pwsnafu]] 15:44, 22 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:No, I am sorry it is not. You can add it if you so wish. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 16:26, 22 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== RE: Divine Evoker ==<br />
<br />
dont worry, i just dont have alot of time on a computer. The class is finished now. {{Unsigned|Alabastor|08:21, 23 February 2007 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
:It's fine, as long as you got it done. Thanks for adding it. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 12:25, 24 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== WikiWorld ==<br />
<br />
Is anyone interested in collaborating to work on Wiki World? --[[User:Kamin|Kamin]] 18:04, 24 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:I would contact [[User:Dmilewski|Dmilewski]]. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 09:53, 25 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Question on Policy ==<br />
<br />
Hey. I just nominated myself for adminship ([[Requests for Adminship/EldritchNumen]]). What is the policy on advertising? I know, above all, that I should not do any myself. Should it be put on the main page in news? I'm curious because I'm afraid that few people will notice it in recent changes and there will be no voting or discussion... I defer whatever decisions are to be made (if any) to you. I just want to make sure that people know I applied so they can discuss the merit of accepting or rejecting me. Thanks! &mdash;[[User:EldritchNumen|EldritchNumen]] 16:33, 25 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:News is the place, I will add it. Thanks for bringing this up before doing it yourself. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 17:23, 25 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Still alive ==<br />
<br />
Alive if you wanted to know. --[[User:Pz.Az.04Maus|Pz.Az.04Maus]] 02:34, 26 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
:Thats good. If you want to help out with something let me know, seeing that I have not seen you make edits in a while. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 09:31, 26 February 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Proposed Color Scheme Page ==<br />
<br />
Hey. I made the page for the [[Proposed Color Scheme]]. All that needs to be done is a link to this page (Proposed Color Scheme) needs to be added to the News on the main page. The caption could be "DnD Wiki is undergoing a search for a new color scheme. Vote [[Proposed Color Scheme|here]] and tell us what you think!". Feel free to change the proposed color page as it seems best to you. &mdash;[[User:EldritchNumen|EldritchNumen]] 01:06, 1 March 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
== Wikify? ==<br />
<br />
Well, I haven't been on here in a while, and I was looking through the site today, and saw that both articles I've posted need to be 'Wikified'. Problem is, I really don't have a clue what that means. Could you possibly explain so I can fix that problem?</div>Maverick Wolfhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Talk:Spellfire_Warrior_(3.5e_Class)&diff=82693Talk:Spellfire Warrior (3.5e Class)2007-03-01T15:00:31Z<p>Maverick Wolf: </p>
<hr />
<div>This is just a Rip-off of the Spellfire Channeler PrC in Magic of Faerun which if I rember correctly is not OGL.<br />
<br />
-The Class Ninja<br />
<br />
===Not Quite===<br />
This class is actually a combination of the Spellfire Channeler and the Spellfire Heirophant, with additional abilities of my own making. While said classes are not OGL, they're abilities can be used in other OGL things. Using their abilities in another class does not in any way give someone the necessary stats to play one. And I find the term 'rip-off' rather offensive really. Most custom classes use abilities from other classes that have already been published. It's entirely normal. I felt the PrCs presented for Spellfire were utterly lacking and decided I wanted a Spellfire-based core class. I didn't rip-off anything.<br />
<br />
- Maverick Wolf<br />
<br />
== My sentiments exactly. ==<br />
<br />
When I make varient classes, I tend to just see what the base class that I'm building off of is, and then build straight from there and edit it as I go along. Its simpler for me to think of my classes as "builds" rather than classes, at least untill I'm finished with them.<br />
<br />
The Spellfire Warrior is cool, but he's not my style. He seems more of a retributive character, and very reactive. "You get hit with blah." "Ha, I send it back for blah damage.". Not really my idea of a go-to character, but thats just my opinion.<br />
<br />
(Forgot to log in before I changed the page, sorry for any confusion, although I doubt there was any)<br />
<br />
''Lord_Canius''<br />
<br />
== Hit dice??? ==<br />
<br />
Maybe I'm just missing it, yet I can't see which HD he uses.<br />
<br />
Some more fighter feat instead of spellfire focused one could improve the idea of "warrior" his name conveys...<br />
<br />
--Third Eye-- {{Unsigned|84.221.198.36|14:08, 28 January 2007 (MST)}}<br />
<br />
:I cannot find it either, would HD would you recommend for this class? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 13:11, 28 January 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
The Hit Dice can be found under the Class Abilities section, which apparently got a little clumped together and has now been separated. It uses a d8. --[[User:Maverick Wolf|Maverick Wolf]] 09:57, 1 March 2007 (EST)</div>Maverick Wolfhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Spellfire_Warrior_(3.5e_Class)&diff=82690Spellfire Warrior (3.5e Class)2007-03-01T14:51:59Z<p>Maverick Wolf: /* Game Rule Information */</p>
<hr />
<div><dplc>Spellfire Warrior (DnD Class)|{{Base Class Description|Spellfire Warrior|NR|Moderate Spellcasting|A magic user of another sort, Spellfire Warriors are people who take the raw energy of magic and control it. These people do not use magic in the normal sense of the word. Instead, they employ it in its raw form, as pure energy. Spellfire Warriors wield spellfire, an ability that should not be taken lightly.}}</dplc><br />
{{Wikify|February 2007}}<br />
{{Balance|Not-Rated|Spellfire_Warrior|DnD_Class}}<br />
<br />
==Spellfire Warrior (D&D Class)==<br />
<br />
''Thamior almost allowed himself to panic. Eight Red Wizards surrounded him, all at a distance. His bow was engulfed in flames and lay 10 feet away. The power usually stored in his body had been emptied, used to destroy the rangers whose tracking and archery skills had landed him in the position he was in, and whose bodies were now scattered next to the few remaining wizards. It had been five long minutes, and it appeared that the wizards had no spells left, so Thamior decided to move and try to make a break for it. Eight rays of icy blue and white launched at him simultaneously. Luckily, the wizards were far enough away to give Thamior plenty of warning. He didn’t try to dodge. Instead, he took in the power, feeling it surge through his body.<br />
<br />
''Then he smiled. The Red Wizards did not. Yellow and white fire leapt from Thamior’s fingers and eight high-pitched screams echoed through the canyon. The fire stopped as the screams did. Thamior used the remaining power within his body to restore some of his strength. Then he laughed as he walked past the corpses. “The most humiliating defeats are those caused by your own devices,” he told one of the corpses. "I hope they're not laughing too hard where you are."''''<br />
<br />
The Weave is the essence of magic, the very thing that allows magic to exist. Some access the Weave through power gained through knowledge or some innate talent, shaping it to their needs. Others access it through knowledge granted by the gods, not knowing how they actually perform their spells, only knowing that their god has granted them the ability to do so.<br />
<br />
There are people of another sort, people who take the raw energy of the Weave and control it. They feel no need to shape it, though some have learned how. These people do not use magic in the normal sense of the word. Instead, they employ it in its raw form, as pure energy, nothing more, nothing less, a combination of the power of magic and the power of a god. These people wield spellfire, an ability that should not be taken lightly.<br />
<br />
Many of the people choose to pursue other paths, leaving their spellfire abilities weakened and never learning to shape it in any way. Though they may eventually learn much of what a spellfire warrior does, none of them will ever be his equal. A spellfire warrior focuses almost exclusively on his spellfire abilities, though he also teaches himself combat techniques, knowing spellfire will not always be available, so that he may defend himself when he cannot use his innate talent.<br />
<br />
'''Adventure:''' A spellfire warrior may adventure for any number of reasons. He may be adventuring for the sole purpose of bettering his own abilities, or to take down those that would wish to destroy him (such as the Cult of the Dragon). A good spellfire warrior may adventure to protect those weaker than himself, while an evil one may be out simply to destroy them.<br />
<br />
'''Characteristics:''' A spellfire warrior’s main ability is, of course, his spellfire, followed closely by his combat abilities. Though not as strong as other warriors, he can often handle more damage than others, giving him some strength where he might otherwise be weak.<br />
<br />
As he gains experience, a spellfire warrior’s talent grows. He eventually learns to shape it, and even to pull some of the very essence of the Weave into himself to recharge. His combat abilities don’t improve much, but are often augmented by his spellfire in one way or another.<br />
<br />
'''Alignment:''' Spellfire warriors are as varied as any other group and as such have no preferred alignment. Equal numbers of good and evil spellfire warriors exist within the world, and even those on the same axis of good and evil may differ greatly in their stands on chaos and law.<br />
<br />
'''Religion:''' Many spellfire warriors worship Mystra, for she is the essence of the Weave, and without her they would be nothing. Others worship their racial deities, but willingly acknowledge Mystra’s effect on their lives, and at least do more than pay her lip service.<br />
<br />
'''Backgrounds:''' Spellfire warriors come from all sorts of backgrounds, from poor servant boys to kings. No common background theme can be found among them.<br />
<br />
'''Races:''' Like their backgrounds, spellfire warriors have no race that is more common than another race, being found equally among the more civilized races. Though they are not quite as common among uncivilized races, they are nonetheless far from rare.<br />
<br />
'''Other Classes:''' Spellfire warriors have no special feelings towards other classes, except perhaps those who are spellfire channelers, who they pity. They acknowledge that all classes have their own inner strengths and as such should no be belittled.<br />
<br />
'''Role:''' Spellfire warriors serve best as backup fighters and healers. Though they excel in neither of these roles, they are decent in both, and can prove to be of great assistance. They are meant to be part of the background, as their abilities tend to make them glaring targets, which is why a decent amount of their “training” focuses on defense.<br />
<br />
===Game Rule Information===<br />
<br />
Spellfire Warriors have the following game statistics:<br />
<br />
'''Abilities:''' Constitution is extremely important, as it grants the ability to store more spellfire energy levels safely and also grants them more hit points. Charisma is also important, as it fuels a <br />
number of the spellfire warrior’s abilities. Strength and Dexterity often prove important, as it increases their combat prowess.<br />
<br />
'''Alignment:''' Any<br />
<br />
'''Hit Die:''' d8<br />
<br />
===Class Skills===<br />
<br />
The spellfire warrior’s class skills (and the key ability for each skill) are: Balance (Dex), Climb (Str), Concentration (Con), Craft (Int), Disguise (Cha), Escape Artist (Dex), Hide (Dex), Jump (Str), Knowledge (arcana) (Int), Move Silently (Dex), Profession (Wis), Ride (Dex), Spellcraft (Int), Survival (Wis), Swim (Str), Tumble (Dex), and Use Magic Device (Cha). See Chapter 4: Skills of the Player’s Handbook version 3.5 for skill descriptions.<br />
<br />
'''Skill Points at First Level:''' (4 + Intelligence modifier) x4<br />
<br />
'''Skill Points at Each Additional Level:''' 4 + Intelligence modifier<br />
<br />
===Class Features===<br />
All of the following are class features of the spellfire warrior:<br />
<br />
'''Weapon and Armor Proficiency:''' Spellfire warriors are proficient with all simple weapons and martial weapons. Spellfire warriors are proficient in light armor and with shields, but not tower shields.<br />
<br />
'''Spellfire Wielder:''' A spellfire warrior automatically gains the Spellfire Wielder feat from Magic of Faerun at first level. Remember that allowance of this feat is specifically left to the DM, so you can’t take this class if the feat isn’t allowed.<br />
<br />
'''Force of Personality (Ex):''' Much like a sorcerer, some of a spellfire warrior’s strength comes from his own personality, in its own way. Saves against the spellfire warrior’s blasts of spellfire do not have the set Reflex save DC of 20. Instead, the DC is equal to 10 + the spellfire wielder’s Charisma bonus (minimum 1) + ½ the spellfire wielder’s class levels (minimum 1) in the attack.<br />
<br />
'''Rapid Fire Burst(Ex):''' When using spellfire blasts, a spellfire warrior may strike with a rapid fire burst at the expense of accuracy. When doing so, she may make one extra attack in a round at her highest base attack bonus, but this attack takes a –2 penalty, as does each other attack made that round. The resulting modified base attack bonuses are the same as found under the Flurry of Blows Attack Bonus column on Table: The Monk. This penalty applies for 1 round, so it also affects attacks of opportunity the spellfire wielder might make before her next action. When a spellfire warrior reaches 5th level, the penalty lessens to –1, and at 9th level it disappears. A spellfire warrior must use a full attack action to strike with a rapid fire burst.<br />
<br />
When a spellfire warrior reaches 11th level, her rapid fire burst ability improves. In addition to the standard single extra attack she gets from rapid fire burst, she gets a second extra attack at her full base attack bonus.<br />
<br />
This ability may be used to strike multiple targets, but no two targets may be more than 15 feet apart.<br />
<br />
'''Improved Wielder:''' A spellfire warrior may use up to 2x his Constitution score in spellfire energy levels per round, but not more than his Constitution score per blast.<br />
<br />
'''Endurance:''' The spellfire warrior gains the Endurance feat. The bonus to Constitution checks also applies to Constitution checks for storing spellfire energy levels above normal (see Spellfire Battery, below).<br />
<br />
'''Elemental Control:''' A spellfire warrior gains the Elemental Control feat free at 3rd level.<br />
<br />
'''Spellfire Battery (Ex):''' The spellfire warrior’s capacity for storing spellfire energy levels is multiplied by the listed value. However, storing spellfire energy levels in excess of the spellfire warrior’s Constitution score is dangerous, with different effects depending upon the number of levels stored.<br />
Constitution +1 to Constitution x2: The spellfire warrior’s eyes glow brightly, and any creature, magic item, or spell effect that touches the spellfire warrior causes 1 spellfire energy level to be discharged as a harmless burst of light. Once per day, the spellfire warrior must make a Constitution check (DC 10) or take 1d6 points of damage as one of his spellfire energy levels backfires.<br />
Constitution x2 +1 to Constitution x3: As above, plus the spellfire warrior’s skin glows (shedding light as a candle), a touch attack releases 1d4 spellfire energy levels as light, and the spellfire warrior must make the backfire Constitution check every hour.<br />
Constitution x3 +1 to Constitution x4: As above, except the spellfire warrior sheds light equal to a torch, feels a burning sensation within his body (treat as if distracted by nondamaging spell, DC 20 to concentrate), and must make the backfire Constitution check every minute. A touch releases 1d6 spellfire energy levels as a flare spell (DC 10 + number of spellfire energy levels expended) against the spellfire warrior and all creatures within 5 feet of him.<br />
Constitution x4 +1 to Constitution x5: As above, except the spellfire warrior radiates a palpable (but nondamaging) heat to a radius of 20 feet, is in pain (treat as if distracted by nondamaging spell, DC 25 to concentrate), and must make the backfire Constitution check every round. A touch releases 2d6 spellfire energy levels as a flare spell (DC 10 + number of spellfire energy levels expended). The spellfire warrior must make a Will save (DC 25) every round or be forced to expend a maximum-strength blast of energy at a random target within 30 feet in preference to any other action. He may attempt another Will save (DC 20) to choose the target.<br />
Regardless of the number of spellfire energy levels stored, a spellfire warrior can voluntarily expend only a number of spellfire energy levels per round equal to his Constitution score. (Involuntary expenditure, such as that noted above, isn’t limited in this way.)<br />
<br />
'''Improved Healing (Su):''' Beginning at 5th level, the spellfire warrior restores 1d4+1 hit points per spellfire energy level expended when using his ability to heal by touch (rather than the normal 2 points per spellfire energy level).<br />
<br />
'''''Drain Charged Item (Sp):''''' As a standard action, a spellfire warrior can drain a single charge from a touched charged item (including single use items such as potions and scrolls), converting the energy into a single stored spellfire energy level. A full drained item has no magical properties (a potion becomes water, a scroll becomes blank paper). Only one feature of a multiple-use item (such as a scroll with several spells) can be drained per round. A creature gets to make a Will save (DC10 + Charisma modifier + ½ class level) to prevent one of its held or carried items from being drained.<br />
<br />
'''Weapon of Energy (Su):''' Beginning at 8th level, a spellfire warrior may channel his spellfire through his fists or his weapon. By expending one or more spellfire energy levels as a free action, his fists or weapon becomes surrounded by spellfire energy. Any attack he makes deals an additional 1d6 points of elemental damage. The type of elemental damage is chosen at the time of charging the weapon, and may be changed each round as a free action. The aura of spellfire lasts for a number of rounds equal to the number of spellfire energy levels spent.<br />
<br />
'''Weapon Focus:''' At 9th level, the spellfire warrior gains the Weapon Focus (spellfire) feat. If he has already taken this, he instead gains Greater Weapon Focus (spellfire).<br />
<br />
'''Recharge (Ex):''' At 11th level, the spellfire warrior has become attuned to the flow of magic and can draw upon the Weave itself for energy, rather than relying solely upon absorbing other magic. Each day (after a full night's rest) he regains a number of spellfire energy levels equal to 2 x his class level. This cannot raise his stored spellfire energy above his Constitution score, so if he already has a number of stored energy levels equal to or greater than his Constitution, he does not gain any additional energy levels.<br />
<br />
'''''Drain Permanent Item (Sp):''''' The spellfire warrior can drain power from permanent magic items by touch as a standard action. If the item is held or worn, the spellfire warrior must make a melee touch attack to touch it, which provokes an attack of opportunity from the defender. The spellfire warrior must make a level check (d20 + class level) with a bonus to the check equal to ½ his Charisma bonus (if any) against a DC of 11+ the caster level of the item to drain it. A success means the item’s properties are suppressed (as if affected by dispel magic) for 24 hours and the spellfire warrior gains spellfire energy levels equal to half the item’s caster level.<br />
<br />
'''Ranged Healing (Su):''' The spellfire warrior gains the ability to release stored spellfire levels to heal at a range of up to 25 feet (plus 5 feet/4 levels). This requires a ranged touch attack. When used in this way, the spellfire warrior only heals 2 points of damage per spellfire energy level expended, until 17th level, when it increases to 1d4 +1.<br />
<br />
'''Flight (Su):''' The spellfire warrior can expend spellfire energy levels to fly as the spell. Each spellfire energy level expended allows the spellfire warrior to fly for 1 minute. The flying spellfire warrior leaves a visible trail of light that fades after 1 round.<br />
<br />
'''''Greater Charged Item Drain (Sp):''''' A spellfire warrior of 14th level or higher can drain a number of charges from a touched charged item (including single-use items such as potions or scrolls), converting the energy into stored spellfire energy levels. The limit to the number of charges she can drain is equal to his Charisma bonus (minimum 1), but he can’t drain more charges than the item has remaining (each spell on a scroll counts as one charge). A fully drained item has no magical properties (a potion becomes water, a scroll becomes blank paper). A creature gets to make a Will save (DC 10 + ½ class level + Charisma modifier) to prevent one of its held or carried items from being drained.<br />
<br />
'''Spellfire Reserve (Ex):''' At 16th level, the spellfire warrior learns how to store spellfire energy levels in deep reserve. These energy levels don’t count as part of the character’s normal storage capacity, but they also can’t be used to power spellfire effects without first calling them from reserve. Spellfire energy levels in reserve also don’t detect as magical (allowing a spellfire warrior to disguise his true nature). Placing any number of spellfire energy levels into reserve or calling any number of levels from reserve requires a full-round action that provokes an attack of opportunity. The spellfire warrior can store a number of energy levels in reserve equal to his class level plus his Constitution bonus (if any), but cannot store more than his Constitution score.<br />
<br />
'''Spellfire Burst (Su):''' At 17th level, the spellfire warrior can substitute a spellfire burst for a normal spellfire blast. The range remains the same, but instead of requiring a touch attack, the spellfire energy explodes in a 5-foot radius burst at the target point, dealing appropriate damage to all creatures in the area (Reflex half, DC 10 + ½ class level + Charisma modifier). This ability costs an additional two spellfire energy levels per blast and can be used in conjunction with other abilities.<br />
<br />
'''Crown of Fire:''' By expending 10 spellfire energy levels, a channeler can manifest the crown of fire, which appears as a halo around his head and provides light equal to a daylight spell. The crown of fire gives him damage reduction 10/magic and automatically melts all non-magical weapons that strike him (after they deal damage, if any). The crown of fire grants the spellfire warrior spell resistance 32 (as a spell resistance spell by a 20th level caster). Maintaining the crown of fire requires expending 10 spellfire energy levels each round, which can be done as a free action. The crown of fire does not interfere with the the spellfire warrior's actions, including using other spellfire abilities, such as calling up spellfire energy levels from reserve.<br />
<br />
'''''Greater Permanent Item Drain (Sp):''''' Beginning at 18th level[/color], a spellfire warrior can drain increased amounts of power from permanent magic items. This functions as the drain permanent item class ability, but the spellfire warrior instead gains a number of spellfire energy levels equal to the caster level of the item and is not required to make a caster level check. Held or carried items get a Will save to avoid being drained (DC 10 + ½ class level + Charisma modifier). An item with all its permanent abilities drained for the day is still a magic item (for purposes of saving throws against when damaged, etc.).<br />
<br />
'''Maelstrom of Fire (Su):''' The spellfire warrior can release spellfire energy in all directions as a 20-foot-radius spread, dealing 1d6 damage per spellfire energy level expended to all creatures in the area, including allies (Reflex half, DC 10 + ½ class level + Charisma modifier). Also, your spellfire bursts now effect a 10-foot radius burst.<br />
<br />
'''Overcharge (Ex):''' The spellfire warrior is capable of handling much larger amounts of spellfire energy. All limitations on his spellfire capacity are tripled, including the limit on how many spellfire energy levels he may expend per round. This applies to spellfire battery as follows: up to Constitution x3 – no problems; (Constitution x3 ) +1 to Constitution x4 – as Constitution +1 to Constitution x2, etc.<br />
<br />
'''''Haste:''''' A spellfire warrior of 20th level or higher may expend spellfire energy levels to gain the effects of the haste spell. To activate this effect, the spellfire warrior must expend 5 spellfire energy levels. Afterwards, he must spend two spellfire energy levels as a free action to maintain the effect. A spellfire warrior under this effect sparkles with light.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Table 1-1: The Spellfire Warrior<br />
<br />
Base Fort Ref Will<br />
Level Attack Bonus Save Save Save Special<br />
1 0 0 2 2 Force of Personality, Spellfire Wielder, Rapid Fire Burst, Improved Wielder<br />
2 1 0 3 3 Endurance<br />
3 2 1 3 3 Elemental Control<br />
4 3 1 4 4 Spellfire Battery 2<br />
5 3 1 4 4 Improved Healing<br />
6 4 2 5 5 Drain Charged Item<br />
7 5 2 5 5 Spellfire Battery 3<br />
8 6/1 2 6 6 Weapon of Energy<br />
9 6/1 3 6 6 Weapon Focus (spellfire)<br />
10 7/2 3 7 7 Spellfire Battery 4<br />
11 8/3 3 7 7 Drain Permanent Item, Recharge <br />
12 9/4 4 8 8 Ranged Healing (2) <br />
13 9/4 4 8 8 Spellfire Battery 5<br />
14 10/5 4 9 9 Flight, Greater Charged Item Drain<br />
15 11/6/1 5 9 9 Ranged Healing (1d4+1)<br />
16 12/7/2 5 10 10 Spellfire Reserve <br />
17 12/7/2 5 10 10 Spellfire Burst, Crown of Fire<br />
18 13/8/3 6 11 11 Greater Permanent Item Drain<br />
19 14/9/4 6 11 11 Maelstrom of Fire, Overcharge<br />
20 15/10/5 6 12 12 Haste<br />
<br />
==NOTES==<br />
Please leave notes to discussion forum. Any updates, however, will be noted here. Thank you, [[Maverick_Wolf]].<br />
<br />
<br />
----<br />
Back to [[Dungeons and Dragons]]->[[DnD Classes]]<br />
[[Category:DnD]]<br />
[[Category:User]]<br />
[[Category:Class]]<br />
[[Category:Base Class]]<br />
[[Category:Moderate Spellcasting]]</div>Maverick Wolfhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=3.5e_Classes&diff=22503.5e Classes2006-02-16T03:33:08Z<p>Maverick Wolf: </p>
<hr />
<div>If you are putting something on this site, and it is not your idea, please get permission from the author.<br />
<br />
* [[Archer (D&D Class)]]<br />
* [[Feral Warrior (D&D Class)]]<br />
* [[Knight (D&D Class)]]<br />
* [[Spellfire Warrior (D&D Class)]]<br />
* [[Windblade (D&D Class)]]<br />
* [[Undead Paragon (D&D Class)]]<br />
<br />
''This list is organized alphabetically''<br />
== Add a new Class ==<br />
<br />
* [[Add something to the list of]] Classes ''(Click the link)''</div>Maverick Wolfhttps://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Spellfire_Warrior_(3.5e_Class)&diff=2249Spellfire Warrior (3.5e Class)2006-02-16T03:32:10Z<p>Maverick Wolf: /* Spellfire Warrior (D&D Class) */</p>
<hr />
<div>==Spellfire Warrior (D&D Class)==<br />
<br />
''Thamior almost allowed himself to panic. Eight Red Wizards surrounded him, all at a distance. His bow was engulfed in flames and lay 10 feet away. The power usually stored in his body had been emptied, used to destroy the rangers whose tracking and archery skills had landed him in the position he was in, and whose bodies were now scattered next to the few remaining wizards. It had been five long minutes, and it appeared that the wizards had no spells left, so Thamior decided to move and try to make a break for it. Eight rays of icy blue and white launched at him simultaneously. Luckily, the wizards were far enough away to give Thamior plenty of warning. He didn’t try to dodge. Instead, he took in the power, feeling it surge through his body.<br />
<br />
Then he smiled. The Red Wizards did not. Yellow and white fire leapt from Thamior’s fingers and eight high-pitched screams echoed through the canyon. The fire stopped as the screams did. Thamior used the remaining power within his body to restore some of his strength. Then he laughed as he walked past the corpses. “The most humiliating defeats are those caused by your own devices,” he told one of the corpses. "I hope they're not laughing too hard where you are."''<br />
<br />
The Weave is the essence of magic, the very thing that allows magic to exist. Some access the Weave through power gained through knowledge or some innate talent, shaping it to their needs. Others access it through knowledge granted by the gods, not knowing how they actually perform their spells, only knowing that their god has granted them the ability to do so.<br />
<br />
There are people of another sort, people who take the raw energy of the Weave and control it. They feel no need to shape it, though some have learned how. These people do not use magic in the normal sense of the word. Instead, they employ it in its raw form, as pure energy, nothing more, nothing less, a combination of the power of magic and the power of a god. These people wield spellfire, an ability that should not be taken lightly.<br />
<br />
Many of the people choose to pursue other paths, leaving their spellfire abilities weakened and never learning to shape it in any way. Though they may eventually learn much of what a spellfire warrior does, none of them will ever be his equal. A spellfire warrior focuses almost exclusively on his spellfire abilities, though he also teaches himself combat techniques, knowing spellfire will not always be available, so that he may defend himself when he cannot use his innate talent.<br />
<br />
'''Adventure:''' A spellfire warrior may adventure for any number of reasons. He may be adventuring for the sole purpose of bettering his own abilities, or to take down those that would wish to destroy him (such as the Cult of the Dragon). A good spellfire warrior may adventure to protect those weaker than himself, while an evil one may be out simply to destroy them.<br />
<br />
'''Characteristics:''' A spellfire warrior’s main ability is, of course, his spellfire, followed closely by his combat abilities. Though not as strong as other warriors, he can often handle more damage than others, giving him some strength where he might otherwise be weak.<br />
<br />
As he gains experience, a spellfire warrior’s talent grows. He eventually learns to shape it, and even to pull some of the very essence of the Weave into himself to recharge. His combat abilities don’t improve much, but are often augmented by his spellfire in one way or another.<br />
<br />
'''Alignment:''' Spellfire warriors are as varied as any other group and as such have no preferred alignment. Equal numbers of good and evil spellfire warriors exist within the world, and even those on the same axis of good and evil may differ greatly in their stands on chaos and law.<br />
<br />
'''Religion:''' Many spellfire warriors worship Mystra, for she is the essence of the Weave, and without her they would be nothing. Others worship their racial deities, but willingly acknowledge Mystra’s effect on their lives, and at least do more than pay her lip service.<br />
<br />
'''Backgrounds:''' Spellfire warriors come from all sorts of backgrounds, from poor servant boys to kings. No common background theme can be found among them.<br />
<br />
'''Races:''' Like their backgrounds, spellfire warriors have no race that is more common than another race, being found equally among the more civilized races. Though they are not quite as common among uncivilized races, they are nonetheless far from rare.<br />
<br />
'''Other Classes:''' Spellfire warriors have no special feelings towards other classes, except perhaps those who are spellfire channelers, who they pity. They acknowledge that all classes have their own inner strengths and as such should no be belittled.<br />
<br />
'''Role:''' Spellfire warriors serve best as backup fighters and healers. Though they excel in neither of these roles, they are decent in both, and can prove to be of great assistance. They are meant to be part of the background, as their abilities tend to make them glaring targets, which is why a decent amount of their “training” focuses on defense.<br />
<br />
===Game Rule Information===<br />
<br />
Spellfire Warriors have the following game statistics:<br />
'''Abilities:''' Constitution is extremely important, as it grants the ability to store more spellfire energy levels safely and also grants them more hit points. Charisma is also important, as it fuels a number of the spellfire warrior’s abilities. Strength and Dexterity often prove important, as it increases their combat prowess.<br />
'''Alignment:''' Any<br />
'''Hit Die:''' d8<br />
<br />
===Class Skills===<br />
<br />
The spellfire warrior’s class skills (and the key ability for each skill) are: Balance (Dex), Climb (Str), Concentration (Con), Craft (Int), Disguise (Cha), Escape Artist (Dex), Hide (Dex), Jump (Str), Knowledge (arcana) (Int), Move Silently (Dex), Profession (Wis), Ride (Dex), Spellcraft (Int), Survival (Wis), Swim (Str), Tumble (Dex), and Use Magic Device (Cha). See Chapter 4: Skills of the Player’s Handbook version 3.5 for skill descriptions.<br />
<br />
'''Skill Points at First Level:''' (4 + Intelligence modifier) x4<br />
<br />
'''Skill Points at Each Additional Level:''' 4 + Intelligence modifier<br />
<br />
===Class Features===<br />
All of the following are class features of the spellfire warrior:<br />
<br />
'''Weapon and Armor Proficiency:''' Spellfire warriors are proficient with all simple weapons and martial weapons. Spellfire warriors are proficient in light armor and with shields, but not tower shields.<br />
<br />
'''Spellfire Wielder:''' A spellfire warrior automatically gains the Spellfire Wielder feat from Magic of Faerun at first level. Remember that allowance of this feat is specifically left to the DM, so you can’t take this class if the feat isn’t allowed.<br />
<br />
'''Force of Personality (Ex):''' Much like a sorcerer, some of a spellfire warrior’s strength comes from his own personality, in its own way. Saves against the spellfire warrior’s blasts of spellfire do not have the set Reflex save DC of 20. Instead, the DC is equal to 10 + the spellfire wielder’s Charisma bonus (minimum 1) + ½ the spellfire wielder’s class levels (minimum 1) in the attack.<br />
<br />
'''Rapid Fire Burst(Ex):''' When using spellfire blasts, a spellfire warrior may strike with a rapid fire burst at the expense of accuracy. When doing so, she may make one extra attack in a round at her highest base attack bonus, but this attack takes a –2 penalty, as does each other attack made that round. The resulting modified base attack bonuses are the same as found under the Flurry of Blows Attack Bonus column on Table: The Monk. This penalty applies for 1 round, so it also affects attacks of opportunity the spellfire wielder might make before her next action. When a spellfire warrior reaches 5th level, the penalty lessens to –1, and at 9th level it disappears. A spellfire warrior must use a full attack action to strike with a rapid fire burst.<br />
<br />
When a spellfire warrior reaches 11th level, her rapid fire burst ability improves. In addition to the standard single extra attack she gets from rapid fire burst, she gets a second extra attack at her full base attack bonus.<br />
<br />
This ability may be used to strike multiple targets, but no two targets may be more than 15 feet apart.<br />
<br />
'''Improved Wielder:''' A spellfire warrior may use up to 2x his Constitution score in spellfire energy levels per round, but not more than his Constitution score per blast.<br />
<br />
'''Endurance:''' The spellfire warrior gains the Endurance feat. The bonus to Constitution checks also applies to Constitution checks for storing spellfire energy levels above normal (see Spellfire Battery, below).<br />
<br />
'''Elemental Control:''' A spellfire warrior gains the Elemental Control feat free at 3rd level.<br />
<br />
'''Spellfire Battery (Ex):''' The spellfire warrior’s capacity for storing spellfire energy levels is multiplied by the listed value. However, storing spellfire energy levels in excess of the spellfire warrior’s Constitution score is dangerous, with different effects depending upon the number of levels stored.<br />
Constitution +1 to Constitution x2: The spellfire warrior’s eyes glow brightly, and any creature, magic item, or spell effect that touches the spellfire warrior causes 1 spellfire energy level to be discharged as a harmless burst of light. Once per day, the spellfire warrior must make a Constitution check (DC 10) or take 1d6 points of damage as one of his spellfire energy levels backfires.<br />
Constitution x2 +1 to Constitution x3: As above, plus the spellfire warrior’s skin glows (shedding light as a candle), a touch attack releases 1d4 spellfire energy levels as light, and the spellfire warrior must make the backfire Constitution check every hour.<br />
Constitution x3 +1 to Constitution x4: As above, except the spellfire warrior sheds light equal to a torch, feels a burning sensation within his body (treat as if distracted by nondamaging spell, DC 20 to concentrate), and must make the backfire Constitution check every minute. A touch releases 1d6 spellfire energy levels as a flare spell (DC 10 + number of spellfire energy levels expended) against the spellfire warrior and all creatures within 5 feet of him.<br />
Constitution x4 +1 to Constitution x5: As above, except the spellfire warrior radiates a palpable (but nondamaging) heat to a radius of 20 feet, is in pain (treat as if distracted by nondamaging spell, DC 25 to concentrate), and must make the backfire Constitution check every round. A touch releases 2d6 spellfire energy levels as a flare spell (DC 10 + number of spellfire energy levels expended). The spellfire warrior must make a Will save (DC 25) every round or be forced to expend a maximum-strength blast of energy at a random target within 30 feet in preference to any other action. He may attempt another Will save (DC 20) to choose the target.<br />
Regardless of the number of spellfire energy levels stored, a spellfire warrior can voluntarily expend only a number of spellfire energy levels per round equal to his Constitution score. (Involuntary expenditure, such as that noted above, isn’t limited in this way.)<br />
<br />
'''Improved Healing (Su):''' Beginning at 5th level, the spellfire warrior restores 1d4+1 hit points per spellfire energy level expended when using his ability to heal by touch (rather than the normal 2 points per spellfire energy level).<br />
<br />
'''''Drain Charged Item (Sp):''''' As a standard action, a spellfire warrior can drain a single charge from a touched charged item (including single use items such as potions and scrolls), converting the energy into a single stored spellfire energy level. A full drained item has no magical properties (a potion becomes water, a scroll becomes blank paper). Only one feature of a multiple-use item (such as a scroll with several spells) can be drained per round. A creature gets to make a Will save (DC10 + Charisma modifier + ½ class level) to prevent one of its held or carried items from being drained.<br />
<br />
'''Weapon of Energy (Su):''' Beginning at 8th level, a spellfire warrior may channel his spellfire through his fists or his weapon. By expending one or more spellfire energy levels as a free action, his fists or weapon becomes surrounded by spellfire energy. Any attack he makes deals an additional 1d6 points of elemental damage. The type of elemental damage is chosen at the time of charging the weapon, and may be changed each round as a free action. The aura of spellfire lasts for a number of rounds equal to the number of spellfire energy levels spent.<br />
<br />
'''Weapon Focus:''' At 9th level, the spellfire warrior gains the Weapon Focus (spellfire) feat. If he has already taken this, he instead gains Greater Weapon Focus (spellfire).<br />
<br />
'''Recharge (Ex):''' At 11th level, the spellfire warrior has become attuned to the flow of magic and can draw upon the Weave itself for energy, rather than relying solely upon absorbing other magic. Each day (after a full night's rest) he regains a number of spellfire energy levels equal to 2 x his class level. This cannot raise his stored spellfire energy above his Constitution score, so if he already has a number of stored energy levels equal to or greater than his Constitution, he does not gain any additional energy levels.<br />
<br />
'''''Drain Permanent Item (Sp):''''' The spellfire warrior can drain power from permanent magic items by touch as a standard action. If the item is held or worn, the spellfire warrior must make a melee touch attack to touch it, which provokes an attack of opportunity from the defender. The spellfire warrior must make a level check (d20 + class level) with a bonus to the check equal to ½ his Charisma bonus (if any) against a DC of 11+ the caster level of the item to drain it. A success means the item’s properties are suppressed (as if affected by dispel magic) for 24 hours and the spellfire warrior gains spellfire energy levels equal to half the item’s caster level.<br />
<br />
'''Ranged Healing (Su):''' The spellfire warrior gains the ability to release stored spellfire levels to heal at a range of up to 25 feet (plus 5 feet/4 levels). This requires a ranged touch attack. When used in this way, the spellfire warrior only heals 2 points of damage per spellfire energy level expended, until 17th level, when it increases to 1d4 +1.<br />
<br />
'''Flight (Su):''' The spellfire warrior can expend spellfire energy levels to fly as the spell. Each spellfire energy level expended allows the spellfire warrior to fly for 1 minute. The flying spellfire warrior leaves a visible trail of light that fades after 1 round.<br />
<br />
'''''Greater Charged Item Drain (Sp):''''' A spellfire warrior of 14th level or higher can drain a number of charges from a touched charged item (including single-use items such as potions or scrolls), converting the energy into stored spellfire energy levels. The limit to the number of charges she can drain is equal to his Charisma bonus (minimum 1), but he can’t drain more charges than the item has remaining (each spell on a scroll counts as one charge). A fully drained item has no magical properties (a potion becomes water, a scroll becomes blank paper). A creature gets to make a Will save (DC 10 + ½ class level + Charisma modifier) to prevent one of its held or carried items from being drained.<br />
<br />
'''Spellfire Reserve (Ex):''' At 16th level, the spellfire warrior learns how to store spellfire energy levels in deep reserve. These energy levels don’t count as part of the character’s normal storage capacity, but they also can’t be used to power spellfire effects without first calling them from reserve. Spellfire energy levels in reserve also don’t detect as magical (allowing a spellfire warrior to disguise his true nature). Placing any number of spellfire energy levels into reserve or calling any number of levels from reserve requires a full-round action that provokes an attack of opportunity. The spellfire warrior can store a number of energy levels in reserve equal to his class level plus his Constitution bonus (if any), but cannot store more than his Constitution score.<br />
<br />
'''Spellfire Burst (Su):''' At 17th level, the spellfire warrior can substitute a spellfire burst for a normal spellfire blast. The range remains the same, but instead of requiring a touch attack, the spellfire energy explodes in a 5-foot radius burst at the target point, dealing appropriate damage to all creatures in the area (Reflex half, DC 10 + ½ class level + Charisma modifier). This ability costs an additional two spellfire energy levels per blast and can be used in conjunction with other abilities.<br />
<br />
'''Crown of Fire:''' By expending 10 spellfire energy levels, a channeler can manifest the crown of fire, which appears as a halo around his head and provides light equal to a daylight spell. The crown of fire gives him damage reduction 10/magic and automatically melts all non-magical weapons that strike him (after they deal damage, if any). The crown of fire grants the spellfire warrior spell resistance 32 (as a spell resistance spell by a 20th level caster). Maintaining the crown of fire requires expending 10 spellfire energy levels each round, which can be done as a free action. The crown of fire does not interfere with the the spellfire warrior's actions, including using other spellfire abilities, such as calling up spellfire energy levels from reserve.<br />
<br />
'''''Greater Permanent Item Drain (Sp):''''' Beginning at 18th level[/color], a spellfire warrior can drain increased amounts of power from permanent magic items. This functions as the drain permanent item class ability, but the spellfire warrior instead gains a number of spellfire energy levels equal to the caster level of the item and is not required to make a caster level check. Held or carried items get a Will save to avoid being drained (DC 10 + ½ class level + Charisma modifier). An item with all its permanent abilities drained for the day is still a magic item (for purposes of saving throws against when damaged, etc.).<br />
<br />
'''Maelstrom of Fire (Su):''' The spellfire warrior can release spellfire energy in all directions as a 20-foot-radius spread, dealing 1d6 damage per spellfire energy level expended to all creatures in the area, including allies (Reflex half, DC 10 + ½ class level + Charisma modifier). Also, your spellfire bursts now effect a 10-foot radius burst.<br />
<br />
'''Overcharge (Ex):''' The spellfire warrior is capable of handling much larger amounts of spellfire energy. All limitations on his spellfire capacity are tripled, including the limit on how many spellfire energy levels he may expend per round. This applies to spellfire battery as follows: up to Constitution x3 – no problems; (Constitution x3 ) +1 to Constitution x4 – as Constitution +1 to Constitution x2, etc.<br />
<br />
'''''Haste:''''' A spellfire warrior of 20th level or higher may expend spellfire energy levels to gain the effects of the haste spell. To activate this effect, the spellfire warrior must expend 5 spellfire energy levels. Afterwards, he must spend two spellfire energy levels as a free action to maintain the effect. A spellfire warrior under this effect sparkles with light.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Table 1-1: The Spellfire Warrior<br />
<br />
Base Fort Ref Will<br />
Level Attack Bonus Save Save Save Special<br />
1 0 0 2 2 Force of Personality, Spellfire Wielder, Rapid Fire Burst, Improved Wielder<br />
2 1 0 3 3 Endurance<br />
3 2 1 3 3 Elemental Control<br />
4 3 1 4 4 Spellfire Battery 2<br />
5 3 1 4 4 Improved Healing<br />
6 4 2 5 5 Drain Charged Item<br />
7 5 2 5 5 Spellfire Battery 3<br />
8 6/1 2 6 6 Weapon of Energy<br />
9 6/1 3 6 6 Weapon Focus (spellfire)<br />
10 7/2 3 7 7 Spellfire Battery 4<br />
11 8/3 3 7 7 Drain Permanent Item, Recharge <br />
12 9/4 4 8 8 Ranged Healing (2) <br />
13 9/4 4 8 8 Spellfire Battery 5<br />
14 10/5 4 9 9 Flight, Greater Charged Item Drain<br />
15 11/6/1 5 9 9 Ranged Healing (1d4+1)<br />
16 12/7/2 5 10 10 Spellfire Reserve <br />
17 12/7/2 5 10 10 Spellfire Burst, Crown of Fire<br />
18 13/8/3 6 11 11 Greater Permanent Item Drain<br />
19 14/9/4 6 11 11 Maelstrom of Fire, Overcharge<br />
20 15/10/5 6 12 12 Haste<br />
<br />
<br />
==NOTES==<br />
Please leave notes to discussion forum. Any updates, however, will be noted here. Thank you, Maverick_Wolf.</div>Maverick Wolf