http://www.dandwiki.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&user=64.228.202.181&feedformat=atomD&D Wiki - User contributions [en]2013-05-25T00:36:49ZUser contributionsMediaWiki 1.19.6http://www.dandwiki.com/wiki/Talk:Requests_for_Adminship/Great_Wyrm_Black_DragonTalk:Requests for Adminship/Great Wyrm Black Dragon2007-12-08T02:51:16Z<p>64.228.202.181: </p>
<hr />
<div>As the vandal in question, Black Dragon himself has reverted the changes I made to his page to it's current version, and added onto it. '''unsigned'''<br />
<br />
:I added this to the talk page, as it seems a more appropriate place. Since you're clearly looking at my edits, let me just suggest that you take a similar course to mine, and instead of vandalizing, post a comment at the bottom of the voting page. The comments section is free for unregistered users to use, so go ahead and post there if you have something to say. Just please keep it clean. --[[User:Daniel Draco|Daniel Draco]] 19:31, 7 December 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::But that's no fun. :| Besides, I got to see some legendary vandal busting action, worthy of another Barnstar or so. I already voiced my complaints against this joke of a human as everyone is probably aware, and drew quite a bit of attention to his profile, which is far more offensive than me, on the premise that he's serious and I'm just a troll with fast internet and a slippery connection. If my opinion's worth anything, don't let him on the team. --g0tt<br />
<br />
:::Well, then create an account and become a registered wiki user, then you can cast your vote officially, which might actually work towards him not becoming an admin, if that's what you want. --[[User:Daniel Draco|Daniel Draco]] 19:44, 7 December 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::Looks like others have caught the smell and have also picked up on this, with the inclusion of a rather condemning piece of evidence against him. Registering at this point would be moot, since anyone that actually supports him will obviously be out of their minds. --g0tt</div>64.228.202.181http://www.dandwiki.com/wiki/Talk:Requests_for_Adminship/Great_Wyrm_Black_DragonTalk:Requests for Adminship/Great Wyrm Black Dragon2007-12-08T02:40:35Z<p>64.228.202.181: </p>
<hr />
<div>As the vandal in question, Black Dragon himself has reverted the changes I made to his page to it's current version, and added onto it. '''unsigned'''<br />
<br />
:I added this to the talk page, as it seems a more appropriate place. Since you're clearly looking at my edits, let me just suggest that you take a similar course to mine, and instead of vandalizing, post a comment at the bottom of the voting page. The comments section is free for unregistered users to use, so go ahead and post there if you have something to say. Just please keep it clean. --[[User:Daniel Draco|Daniel Draco]] 19:31, 7 December 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
::But that's no fun. :| Besides, I got to see some legendary vandal busting action, worthy of another Barnstar or so. I already voiced my complaints against this joke of a human as everyone is probably aware, and drew quite a bit of attention to his profile, which is far more offensive than me, on the premise that he's serious and I'm just a troll with fast internet and a slippery connection. If my opinion's worth anything, don't let him on the team. --g0tt</div>64.228.202.181http://www.dandwiki.com/wiki/Requests_for_Adminship/Great_Wyrm_Black_DragonRequests for Adminship/Great Wyrm Black Dragon2007-12-08T02:29:26Z<p>64.228.202.181: </p>
<hr />
<div>===[[Requests for Adminship/Great Wyrm Black Dragon|Great Wyrm Black Dragon]]===<br />
'''[{{fullurl:Requests for Adminship/Great Wyrm Black Dragon|action=edit}} Voice your opinion]'''<br />
'''(0/0/0) Ending 6:00 (PM), 14 December 2007 (MDT)'''<br />
<br />
I am nominating myself because I understand fully the devotion and commitment needed for wikis. I was formerly and admin for Wikipedia. One day while banning spammers on the Dungeons & Dragons wikipage, I noticed that dandwiki.com was a new external link I had never known. I have always love D&D and since wikipedia was becoming corrupt, I renounced my adminship and decided that I would like to help out dandwiki.com<br />
<br />
:Candidates Prelude <br />
<br />
;Questions for the candidate<br />
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve D&D Wiki in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:<br />
:'''1.''' What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please read the page about [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators administrators] and the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_reading_list administrators' reading list] on Wikipedia before answering.<br />
::'''A:''' I plan on banning people for spamming. I also plan on making bots to keep dandwiki up to date and faster <br />
<br />
:'''2.''' Of your articles or contributions to D&D Wiki, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?<br />
::'''A:''' Not as of yet because I am a farely new member<br />
<br />
:'''3.''' Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?<br />
::'''A:''' I have never had any conflict on dandwiki!<br />
<br />
;General comments<br />
<br />
----<br />
<br />
<!-- IMPORTANT: Only registered D&D Wikians may comment in the "support", "oppose" or "neutral" sections. Non-registered users or editors who are not logged in are welcome to participate in the "comments" and "questions" sections. --><br />
<br />
'''Discussion''' <br />
<br />
<br />
'''Support'''<br />
<br />
'''Oppose'''<br />
* '''Oppose''' Considering the potentially offensive things on his user page, I oppose Great Wyrm Black Dragon becoming an admin. I believe that admins should be, as has been said elsewhere, "the face" of the wiki. I personally do not feel comfortable being part of a wiki with an admin who posts such offensive things, and I'm certain I'm not the only one who feels that way. However, considering the vandalism attacks that occurred moments ago, if I'm told that those posts were part of the vandalism, I'll retract this vote. --[[User:Daniel Draco|Daniel Draco]] 19:09, 7 December 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
As the vandal in question, Black Dragon himself has reverted the changes I made to his page to it's current version, and added onto it. You can easily check the history log to see himself add his offensive information before any vandalism began/<br />
<br />
'''Neutral'''</div>64.228.202.181http://www.dandwiki.com/wiki/Requests_for_Adminship/Great_Wyrm_Black_DragonRequests for Adminship/Great Wyrm Black Dragon2007-12-08T02:24:38Z<p>64.228.202.181: /* Great Wyrm Black Dragon */</p>
<hr />
<div>===[[Requests for Adminship/Great Wyrm Black Dragon|Great Wyrm Black Dragon]]===<br />
'''[{{fullurl:Requests for Adminship/Great Wyrm Black Dragon|action=edit}} Voice your opinion]'''<br />
'''(0/0/0) Ending 6:00 (PM), 14 December 2007 (MDT)'''<br />
<br />
I am nominating myself because I understand fully the devotion and commitment needed for wikis. I was formerly and admin for Wikipedia. One day while banning spammers on the Dungeons & Dragons wikipage, I noticed that dandwiki.com was a new external link I had never known. I have always love D&D and since wikipedia was becoming corrupt, I renounced my adminship and decided that I would like to help out dandwiki.com<br />
<br />
:Candidates Prelude <br />
<br />
;Questions for the candidate<br />
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve D&D Wiki in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:<br />
:'''1.''' What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please read the page about [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators administrators] and the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_reading_list administrators' reading list] on Wikipedia before answering.<br />
::'''A:''' I plan on banning people for spamming. I also plan on making bots to keep dandwiki up to date and faster <br />
<br />
:'''2.''' Of your articles or contributions to D&D Wiki, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?<br />
::'''A:''' Not as of yet because I am a farely new member<br />
<br />
:'''3.''' Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?<br />
::'''A:''' I have never had any conflict on dandwiki!<br />
<br />
;General comments<br />
<br />
----<br />
<br />
<!-- IMPORTANT: Only registered D&D Wikians may comment in the "support", "oppose" or "neutral" sections. Non-registered users or editors who are not logged in are welcome to participate in the "comments" and "questions" sections. --><br />
<br />
'''Discussion''' <br />
<br />
<br />
'''Support'''<br />
<br />
'''Oppose'''<br />
* '''Oppose''' Considering the potentially offensive things on his user page, I oppose Great Wyrm Black Dragon becoming an admin. I believe that admins should be, as has been said elsewhere, "the face" of the wiki. I personally do not feel comfortable being part of a wiki with an admin who posts such offensive things, and I'm certain I'm not the only one who feels that way. However, considering the vandalism attacks that occurred moments ago, if I'm told that those posts were part of the vandalism, I'll retract this vote. --[[User:Daniel Draco|Daniel Draco]] 19:09, 7 December 2007 (MST)<br />
<br />
As the vandal in question, Black Dragon himself has reverted the changes I made to his page to it's current version, and added onto it.<br />
<br />
'''Neutral'''</div>64.228.202.181