https://www.dandwiki.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&user=205.250.76.241&feedformat=atomD&D Wiki - User contributions [en]2024-03-28T19:48:39ZUser contributionsMediaWiki 1.35.8https://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=X-Gene_(3.5e_Template)&diff=425915X-Gene (3.5e Template)2009-11-25T01:00:04Z<p>205.250.76.241: /* X-Gene */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{author<br />
|author_name= Stephen Bollard<br />
|date_created= June 15, 2009<br />
|status= Finished<br />
}}<br />
<br />
== X-Gene ==<br />
<br />
Sometimes, mortals are born with an extra, mutated gene called the "X-gene." Other times, it can simply form after an indivdual experiences certain events in his life. Their abiltiy to heal almost any injury within minutes or even seconds, resist the passage of time and their mental and physical superiority over most ordinary members of their species and other benefits of their condition often makes them legendary figures among their kind. However, they are just as likely to be ostracized, envied and feared for their abilities, especially in primitive or particularly insular societies, and in such cases, those with the X-gene tend to live reclusively. Primitive cultures may even see those gifted with the X-gene to be minor gods or spirits, while others may revile them as demons or bad omens.<br />
<br />
<br />
=== Creating an X-gene Creature ===<br />
<br />
The X-gene can be an acquired or inherited template. It is not always present at birth, and in other cases may form after a near-death experience, an intense, traumatic incident or simply through age. The X-gene is very rare and can only humans, elves, and half-elves are born with it. An X-gene creature loses all benefits of this template if its type changes to aberration (usually in the case of elans skum), construct (except half-golems), dragon, elemental, fey, ooze, plant or undead. An individual with the X-gene uses all the base creature's statistics unless otherwise noted.<br />
<br />
<br />
==== Special Qualities ====<br />
<br />
* '''Heightened Senses (Ex)''': Those blessed with the X-gene are unnaturally aware of their surroundings; this heightened sense gives them the uncanny dodge ability.<br />
<br />
<br />
* '''Ageless (Ex)''': An X-gene creature does not take any penalties from aging and does not die of old age, nor can they be magically aged. Any penalties from aging accrued before the acquisition of this template are instead treated like a special form of ability damage. Once per month, the creature can attempt a DC 25 Fortitude save. If it succeeds, one ability point lost to aging is restored at the end of the next month. If it fails, it cannot be restored by any means short of divine intervention. For example, if a character with the X-gene loses 6 point of Strength prior to the activation of the gene, then regains three but fails his fourth save, he cannot regain any more. One can still increase ability scores through levelling-up or items such as a ''Tome of Gainful Exercise'', provided that it has not already reached the limit of +5 for permanent enhancement bonuses to ability scores in the case of using tomes or similar items. An X-gene creature cannot regain more than one ability point per month using the original, natural method.<br />
<br />
<br />
* '''X-gene Immune System (Ex)''': Due to the constant regeneration of the cells in its body, an X-gene creature is immune to poison, disease, fatigue and ability damage. Anything that would normally cause exhaustion instead causes fatigue and anything that would normally drain an ability score instead causes ability damage. X-grene creatures have no need to eat, sleep or breathe, but can do so if they wish.<br />
<br />
<br />
* '''Darkvision (Ex)''': The X-gene forces the body to new limits, causing it to evolve and surpass its kin. The X-gene grants [[darkvision]] with a range of 120 feet. If the base creature already has darkvision (such as a drow), the range doubles.<br />
<br />
<br />
* '''Regeneration (Ex)''': The X-gene causes the creature's body to heal at an accelerated rate, giving it [[regeneration]] 2. All lethal damage inflicted is treated as non-lethal damage, but acid still deals lethal damage. If a limb or body part (including the head) is somehow lost, it will grow back in 2d6 minutes unless the part was removed with acid. Any limb or body part may be immediately reattached as a free action by holding it to the stump (obviously, one cannot reattach its own head under normal circumstances).<br />
<br />
<br />
==== Abilities ====<br />
<br />
The X-gene enhances every physical and mental trait of the creature, making it surpass most of its kin. The X-gene creature gains +2 to all of its ability scores.<br />
<br />
<br />
==== Level Adjustment ====<br />
<br />
+3<br />
<br />
<br />
----<br />
{{3.5e Creature Templates Breadcrumb}}<br />
[[Category:DnD]]<br />
[[Category:3.5e]]<br />
[[Category:User]]<br />
[[Category:Template]]<br />
[[Category:Type]]<br />
[[Category:Subtype]]<br />
[[Category:LA3]]<br />
[[Category:Alignment]]</div>205.250.76.241https://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Talk:3.5e_Homebrew&diff=425527Talk:3.5e Homebrew2009-11-22T03:47:33Z<p>205.250.76.241: /* Spell Points? */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{Archives<br />
|label1=Archive 1 (Discussions 1 &ndash; 30)<br />
|label2=Archive 2 (Discussions 31 &ndash; 60)<br />
}}<br />
<br />
== Namespace? ==<br />
<br />
Should we make a nampespace (which would remove the identifiers) for all homebrew items on D&D Wiki? Thoughts on this idea? Also, any good ideas for the name of the namespace? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 15:06, 28 February 2008 (MST)<br />
<br />
:I keep toggling on this idea whenever I think about it. Does MediaWiki support nested namespaces? Then we could have "3e:" for all 3.x material, the 3e SRD would have the namespace "3e:SRD:", the UA would have the "3e:UA:" namespace, and the user-submitted section could be "3e:User:" or just "3e:". And if you did a search within the "3e" namespace, it would search all the pages with the "3e" parent namespace. —[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 15:11, 28 February 2008 (MST)<br />
<br />
::I also keep thinking about this as well, and I have not been able to come up with a perfect solution, although yours would be the ideal one if MediaWiki supported nested namespaces, which I do not think it does... How about one step not as advanced as yours; 3.5e (maybe User: tagged on the end? What are your thoughts on this?) and 3.5eSRD? Also, speaking of namespaces, do you have any good idea for the publications? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 13:33, 29 February 2008 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::We could simulate nested namespaces. Does MediaWiki allow a colon as part of the namespace? Then we could still have "3.5e:SRD:" and "3.5:". They just wouldn't have any association with each other&mdash;which is how it is now. If colons aren't allowed, we could just use a hyphen instead "3.5e:" and "3.5-SRD:". No ideas I feel strongly enough for publication namespace. —[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 15:13, 29 February 2008 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::We can do that. What are your thoughts on adding a mock identifier (not <tt>(DnD Class)</tt> but rather <tt>(Class)</tt>)? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 20:50, 13 March 2008 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:::::I was going to bring this up soon! Interesting ''':)'''. Maybe we need to think about the purposes of categories, identifiers, and namespaces. I don't know when and where to use each. What is best practice? --[[User:Aarnott|Aarnott]] 20:57, 13 March 2008 (MDT)<br />
<br />
::::::One thing about the nested namespace idea is that MediaWiki might identify "3.5e:SRD:Some Page" as the page "SRD:Some Page" in the "3.5e" namespace instead of "Some Page" in the "3.5e:SRD" namespace. We should find out before hand whether or not MediaWiki is "greedy" with identifying namespaces.<br />
::::::Identifiers exist to make a distinction between a term's two or more separate connotations, such as the feat [[SRD:Psionic Fist (Feat)|Psionic Fist]] and the prestige class [[SRD:Psionic Fist (Prestige Class)|psionic fist]]. Category vs namespace I have a harder time pinning down when one should be used over the other. Should probably research it on Wikipedia or Wikimedia Meta-Wiki. —[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 21:28, 13 March 2008 (MDT)<br />
<br />
== Okay, where does this go? ==<br />
<br />
I know some, for want of a better word, articles are. They've been stated repeatedly to be open-game content by the writers, and encompass mechanics, flavor, rule tweaks, base classes, and PrCs. Where should they go, or do we make a section for articles like them? {{unsigned|Genowhirl}}<br />
:They probably go in [[3.5e Other|Other]]. {{User:OptimizationFanatic/Signature}} 17:52, 12 May 2008 (MDT)<br />
<br />
== Search Problems ==<br />
<br />
The search function doesn't work. When I type in even the most basic word, it says that it cannot find any page related to it, and I've tried words as simple as "magic." [[User:Noname|Noname]] 21:32, 18 May 2008 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:Below the search results (none), there is a Google search box. Use that for now. --[[User:Axaj|Axaj]] 08:26, 18 September 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
== Names? ==<br />
<br />
Should we make a link to help people think of names, such as names for towns, NPCs, etc.?<br />
It could be organized into towns, worlds, continents, and characters. The geographical places could be organized by climate and overall alignment, for example, an evil desert town. The character names could be done by race, class, and alignment.<br />
<br />
[[User:68.55.33.112|68.55.33.112]] 08:11, 15 June 2008 (MDT)<br />
<br />
==Templates?==<br />
<br />
Where would I place a template? In the Races section? — [[User:OptimizationFanatic|OptimizationFanatic]] <small>([[User talk:OptimizationFanatic|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/OptimizationFanatic|contrib]])</small> 12:50, 17 August 2008 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:Templates are totally under the [[DnD Creatures]] heading and then onto [[3.5e Creature Templates]]. Though, yeah I often want to look for them amongst the [[3.5e Races]]. Perhaps a link to templates on that page would be handy. (I'd do it, but I'm not sure on the policy of editing those pages, plus, I checked the formatting there, and it frightens me). --[[User:Ganteka|Ganteka]] 13:19, 17 August 2008 (MDT)<br />
<br />
::Thanks. — [[User:OptimizationFanatic|OptimizationFanatic]] <small>([[User talk:OptimizationFanatic|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/OptimizationFanatic|contrib]])</small> 17:56, 3 September 2008 (MDT)<br />
<br />
== Add A New Page ==<br />
<br />
[[User:Valentine the Rogue|Valentine]] and I want to add the [[Special:AddPage]] link to this page. What is the protocol for doing so? Also, the drop down menu on [[Special:AddPage]], how can we get the coding for that somehow? --[[User:Ganteka|Ganteka]] 17:09, 2 April 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:I am not completely sure, however I think that the dropdown menu is only their because of SMW. The question is: Do we want to consider preloads or forms standard? I feel that preloads grant a lot more freedom of editing, make it so people learn wiki-code, etc, but also leave a large margin of error. Thinking about it more (I know I said otherwise on [[Discussion:Flaw Addition Page is Bad]]) I feel that preloads are a better option. If we could figure out a way to make it so we could have a dropdown selection for preloads (and not just forms) then I agree - this would make a great addition to this page. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 18:49, 4 April 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
== DPL? ==<br />
<br />
Why in the name of all that is holy is this page made with DPL? It has things added to it so infrequently, and it is so small, that it is totally pointless. Also, as TK has pointed out with a practical demonstration, it allows easy vandalism of this page, just by adding a category to another page. --[[User:Daniel Draco|Daniel Draco]] 22:13, 24 June 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:I see no reason to keep it as DPL -- I don't really think this matter requires consensus... Someone can just revert it if there is a strong disagreement. Getting started on the change now. --[[User:Aarnott|Aarnott]] 08:18, 25 June 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
::Done. --[[User:Aarnott|Aarnott]] 08:35, 25 June 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
== Page Name ==<br />
<br />
This page is just titled Dungeons and Dragons, and the corresponding fourth edition page is titled '4e Homebrew.' Should we change this page to "3.5e Homebrew" and perhaps have the "Dungeons and Dragons" page be an actual page about D&D in general, ala wikipedia? Or perhaps a disambiguation page that links to each edition's SRD/Homebrew? &nbsp;<small><span style="border: 1px solid black; -moz-border-radius:10px">[[User:Hooper|'''<span style="background-color:White; color:Black; -moz-border-radius-topleft:10px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft:10px"> Hooper </span>''']][[User talk:Hooper|<span style="background-color:Black; color:white; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft:10px; -moz-border-radius-topleft:10px">&nbsp;&nbsp;talk&nbsp;&nbsp;</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Hooper|<span style="background-color:black; color:white">&nbsp;&nbsp;contribs&nbsp;&nbsp;</span>]][[Special:Emailuser/Hooper|<span style="background-color:black; color:white; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:10px; -moz-border-radius-topright:10px">&nbsp;&nbsp;email&nbsp;&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 08:33, 6 September 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:Ya, or do you think something like "3.5e User Submitted Content" would be better? Of course we have to wait for the double redirects. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 22:18, 6 September 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
::Nah, just "3.5e Homebrew" would be fine, no need to break established convention. But yes, such a huge change should probably wait for now. Also, what's been going on with the site? It was down for most of the day, and now it keeps coming up and going down again... --[[User:TheWarforgedArtificer|TheWarforgedArtificer]] 22:22, 6 September 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:::User Submitted Content is more correct though. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 22:42, 6 September 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
::::I say stick with "3.5 Homebrew" - most people know what you mean. Any input that would make you think otherwise? -- [[User:Xidoraven|xido]] 15:16, 7 September 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:::::Either way you think GD. I agree that Homebrew is specific, but also User Submitted may be more accurate - as some of the stuff - especially those articles found in the "Other" category may not qualify as "homebrew" as they may not be game-specific. If done I can clear out the double redirects using WhatLinksHere pretty easily, if someone just makes sure to MOI me so I don't miss it. &nbsp;<small><span style="border: 1px solid black; -moz-border-radius:10px">[[User:Hooper|'''<span style="background-color:White; color:Black; -moz-border-radius-topleft:10px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft:10px"> Hooper </span>''']][[User talk:Hooper|<span style="background-color:Black; color:white; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft:10px; -moz-border-radius-topleft:10px">&nbsp;&nbsp;talk&nbsp;&nbsp;</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Hooper|<span style="background-color:black; color:white">&nbsp;&nbsp;contribs&nbsp;&nbsp;</span>]][[Special:Emailuser/Hooper|<span style="background-color:black; color:white; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:10px; -moz-border-radius-topright:10px">&nbsp;&nbsp;email&nbsp;&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 15:20, 7 September 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
::::::Alright. When one has time please feel free to fix some breadcrumbs, links, preloads, etc. It's going to look very messy for a bit. If one has time please help. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 23:40, 7 September 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
== Spell Points? ==<br />
<br />
Okay, I remember there being a page around here somewhere for a variant spellcasting option that used spell points in a similar way that psionics does. However, I can't seem to find this article back no matter what I do.<br />
<br />
Also, I think th search feature on this site is broken, because out of all the times I've used it, it may have gone to the exact page I was looking for twice. Maybe. {{Unsigned|205.250.76.241|19:25, 20 November 2009 (MDT)}}<br />
<br />
:If looking for exact names please keep in mind that pages have an identifying tag present (e.g. "''(3.5e Class)''") which, when trying to pop up with a certain page, should be searched for as well. Additionally keep in mind that pages are sorted; so a certain unpopular page you are looking for may not show up first in the list as such. Although search works fine &mdash; it is not down. Also I have no idea what you are talking about with spell points &mdash; sorry. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 20:22, 20 November 2009 (MST)<br />
<br />
OK, I guess i din't explain that too well. What I meant was that most wikis have redicrect pages for situations like this. For example, when you type in zimmy on wikipedia it takes you to the Bob Dylan page.<br />
<br />
::In 3.5e [[UA:Spell Points|spell points]] are in [[Unearthed Arcana]]. --[[User:Name Violation|Name Violation]] 22:15, 20 November 2009 (MST)</div>205.250.76.241https://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Talk:3.5e_Homebrew&diff=425435Talk:3.5e Homebrew2009-11-21T02:25:16Z<p>205.250.76.241: New section: Spell points?</p>
<hr />
<div>{{Archives<br />
|label1=Archive 1 (Discussions 1 &ndash; 30)<br />
|label2=Archive 2 (Discussions 31 &ndash; 60)<br />
}}<br />
<br />
== Namespace? ==<br />
<br />
Should we make a nampespace (which would remove the identifiers) for all homebrew items on D&D Wiki? Thoughts on this idea? Also, any good ideas for the name of the namespace? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 15:06, 28 February 2008 (MST)<br />
<br />
:I keep toggling on this idea whenever I think about it. Does MediaWiki support nested namespaces? Then we could have "3e:" for all 3.x material, the 3e SRD would have the namespace "3e:SRD:", the UA would have the "3e:UA:" namespace, and the user-submitted section could be "3e:User:" or just "3e:". And if you did a search within the "3e" namespace, it would search all the pages with the "3e" parent namespace. —[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 15:11, 28 February 2008 (MST)<br />
<br />
::I also keep thinking about this as well, and I have not been able to come up with a perfect solution, although yours would be the ideal one if MediaWiki supported nested namespaces, which I do not think it does... How about one step not as advanced as yours; 3.5e (maybe User: tagged on the end? What are your thoughts on this?) and 3.5eSRD? Also, speaking of namespaces, do you have any good idea for the publications? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 13:33, 29 February 2008 (MST)<br />
<br />
:::We could simulate nested namespaces. Does MediaWiki allow a colon as part of the namespace? Then we could still have "3.5e:SRD:" and "3.5:". They just wouldn't have any association with each other&mdash;which is how it is now. If colons aren't allowed, we could just use a hyphen instead "3.5e:" and "3.5-SRD:". No ideas I feel strongly enough for publication namespace. —[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 15:13, 29 February 2008 (MST)<br />
<br />
::::We can do that. What are your thoughts on adding a mock identifier (not <tt>(DnD Class)</tt> but rather <tt>(Class)</tt>)? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 20:50, 13 March 2008 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:::::I was going to bring this up soon! Interesting ''':)'''. Maybe we need to think about the purposes of categories, identifiers, and namespaces. I don't know when and where to use each. What is best practice? --[[User:Aarnott|Aarnott]] 20:57, 13 March 2008 (MDT)<br />
<br />
::::::One thing about the nested namespace idea is that MediaWiki might identify "3.5e:SRD:Some Page" as the page "SRD:Some Page" in the "3.5e" namespace instead of "Some Page" in the "3.5e:SRD" namespace. We should find out before hand whether or not MediaWiki is "greedy" with identifying namespaces.<br />
::::::Identifiers exist to make a distinction between a term's two or more separate connotations, such as the feat [[SRD:Psionic Fist (Feat)|Psionic Fist]] and the prestige class [[SRD:Psionic Fist (Prestige Class)|psionic fist]]. Category vs namespace I have a harder time pinning down when one should be used over the other. Should probably research it on Wikipedia or Wikimedia Meta-Wiki. —[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 21:28, 13 March 2008 (MDT)<br />
<br />
== Okay, where does this go? ==<br />
<br />
I know some, for want of a better word, articles are. They've been stated repeatedly to be open-game content by the writers, and encompass mechanics, flavor, rule tweaks, base classes, and PrCs. Where should they go, or do we make a section for articles like them? {{unsigned|Genowhirl}}<br />
:They probably go in [[3.5e Other|Other]]. {{User:OptimizationFanatic/Signature}} 17:52, 12 May 2008 (MDT)<br />
<br />
== Search Problems ==<br />
<br />
The search function doesn't work. When I type in even the most basic word, it says that it cannot find any page related to it, and I've tried words as simple as "magic." [[User:Noname|Noname]] 21:32, 18 May 2008 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:Below the search results (none), there is a Google search box. Use that for now. --[[User:Axaj|Axaj]] 08:26, 18 September 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
== Names? ==<br />
<br />
Should we make a link to help people think of names, such as names for towns, NPCs, etc.?<br />
It could be organized into towns, worlds, continents, and characters. The geographical places could be organized by climate and overall alignment, for example, an evil desert town. The character names could be done by race, class, and alignment.<br />
<br />
[[User:68.55.33.112|68.55.33.112]] 08:11, 15 June 2008 (MDT)<br />
<br />
==Templates?==<br />
<br />
Where would I place a template? In the Races section? — [[User:OptimizationFanatic|OptimizationFanatic]] <small>([[User talk:OptimizationFanatic|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/OptimizationFanatic|contrib]])</small> 12:50, 17 August 2008 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:Templates are totally under the [[DnD Creatures]] heading and then onto [[3.5e Creature Templates]]. Though, yeah I often want to look for them amongst the [[3.5e Races]]. Perhaps a link to templates on that page would be handy. (I'd do it, but I'm not sure on the policy of editing those pages, plus, I checked the formatting there, and it frightens me). --[[User:Ganteka|Ganteka]] 13:19, 17 August 2008 (MDT)<br />
<br />
::Thanks. — [[User:OptimizationFanatic|OptimizationFanatic]] <small>([[User talk:OptimizationFanatic|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/OptimizationFanatic|contrib]])</small> 17:56, 3 September 2008 (MDT)<br />
<br />
== Add A New Page ==<br />
<br />
[[User:Valentine the Rogue|Valentine]] and I want to add the [[Special:AddPage]] link to this page. What is the protocol for doing so? Also, the drop down menu on [[Special:AddPage]], how can we get the coding for that somehow? --[[User:Ganteka|Ganteka]] 17:09, 2 April 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:I am not completely sure, however I think that the dropdown menu is only their because of SMW. The question is: Do we want to consider preloads or forms standard? I feel that preloads grant a lot more freedom of editing, make it so people learn wiki-code, etc, but also leave a large margin of error. Thinking about it more (I know I said otherwise on [[Discussion:Flaw Addition Page is Bad]]) I feel that preloads are a better option. If we could figure out a way to make it so we could have a dropdown selection for preloads (and not just forms) then I agree - this would make a great addition to this page. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 18:49, 4 April 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
== DPL? ==<br />
<br />
Why in the name of all that is holy is this page made with DPL? It has things added to it so infrequently, and it is so small, that it is totally pointless. Also, as TK has pointed out with a practical demonstration, it allows easy vandalism of this page, just by adding a category to another page. --[[User:Daniel Draco|Daniel Draco]] 22:13, 24 June 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:I see no reason to keep it as DPL -- I don't really think this matter requires consensus... Someone can just revert it if there is a strong disagreement. Getting started on the change now. --[[User:Aarnott|Aarnott]] 08:18, 25 June 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
::Done. --[[User:Aarnott|Aarnott]] 08:35, 25 June 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
== Page Name ==<br />
<br />
This page is just titled Dungeons and Dragons, and the corresponding fourth edition page is titled '4e Homebrew.' Should we change this page to "3.5e Homebrew" and perhaps have the "Dungeons and Dragons" page be an actual page about D&D in general, ala wikipedia? Or perhaps a disambiguation page that links to each edition's SRD/Homebrew? &nbsp;<small><span style="border: 1px solid black; -moz-border-radius:10px">[[User:Hooper|'''<span style="background-color:White; color:Black; -moz-border-radius-topleft:10px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft:10px"> Hooper </span>''']][[User talk:Hooper|<span style="background-color:Black; color:white; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft:10px; -moz-border-radius-topleft:10px">&nbsp;&nbsp;talk&nbsp;&nbsp;</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Hooper|<span style="background-color:black; color:white">&nbsp;&nbsp;contribs&nbsp;&nbsp;</span>]][[Special:Emailuser/Hooper|<span style="background-color:black; color:white; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:10px; -moz-border-radius-topright:10px">&nbsp;&nbsp;email&nbsp;&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 08:33, 6 September 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:Ya, or do you think something like "3.5e User Submitted Content" would be better? Of course we have to wait for the double redirects. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 22:18, 6 September 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
::Nah, just "3.5e Homebrew" would be fine, no need to break established convention. But yes, such a huge change should probably wait for now. Also, what's been going on with the site? It was down for most of the day, and now it keeps coming up and going down again... --[[User:TheWarforgedArtificer|TheWarforgedArtificer]] 22:22, 6 September 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:::User Submitted Content is more correct though. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 22:42, 6 September 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
::::I say stick with "3.5 Homebrew" - most people know what you mean. Any input that would make you think otherwise? -- [[User:Xidoraven|xido]] 15:16, 7 September 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
:::::Either way you think GD. I agree that Homebrew is specific, but also User Submitted may be more accurate - as some of the stuff - especially those articles found in the "Other" category may not qualify as "homebrew" as they may not be game-specific. If done I can clear out the double redirects using WhatLinksHere pretty easily, if someone just makes sure to MOI me so I don't miss it. &nbsp;<small><span style="border: 1px solid black; -moz-border-radius:10px">[[User:Hooper|'''<span style="background-color:White; color:Black; -moz-border-radius-topleft:10px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft:10px"> Hooper </span>''']][[User talk:Hooper|<span style="background-color:Black; color:white; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft:10px; -moz-border-radius-topleft:10px">&nbsp;&nbsp;talk&nbsp;&nbsp;</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Hooper|<span style="background-color:black; color:white">&nbsp;&nbsp;contribs&nbsp;&nbsp;</span>]][[Special:Emailuser/Hooper|<span style="background-color:black; color:white; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:10px; -moz-border-radius-topright:10px">&nbsp;&nbsp;email&nbsp;&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 15:20, 7 September 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
::::::Alright. When one has time please feel free to fix some breadcrumbs, links, preloads, etc. It's going to look very messy for a bit. If one has time please help. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 23:40, 7 September 2009 (MDT)<br />
<br />
== Spell points? ==<br />
<br />
Okay, I remember there being a page around here somewhere for a variant spellcasting option that used spell points in a similar way that psionics does. However, I can't seem to find this article back no matter what I do.<br />
<br />
Also, I think th search feature on this site is broken, because out of all the times I've used it, it may have gone to the exact page I was looking for twice. Maybe.</div>205.250.76.241